Skip to main content
  • Fisheries, Pollution And Algology
  • Published:

Diel feeding migrations in tropical reef fishes

Tägliche Futtersuchwanderungen bei tropischen Riffischen

Kurzfassung

Dämmerungszeiten wandern viele tropische Fische zwischen ihren Ruheplätzen auf dem Riff und ihren Futterplätzen. Diese Wanderungen, die sowohl von tag- als auch von nachtaktiven Fischen durchgeführt werden, sind bedingt durch den Licht-Dunkel-Wechsel, und für viele Arten können sogar Zeit und Weg der Wanderung vorhergesagt werden. Das Muster der tagesrhythmischen Wanderungsbewegungen wird vor allem durch das Ausmaß von Bedrohungen durch Raubfeinde beeinflußt. Bewegungen in ungeschützte Gebiete, die vom Riff wegführen, sind am Tage nicht vorteilhaft. Bei Einbruch der Dunkelheit sind diese offenen Gebiete hingegen ein Konzentrationspunkt der Wanderungen aus dem Riff, wobei sich auch der Zusammenhalt der Fischschwärme verringert. Da Schwarmverhalten und Schutzsuchen die beiden wichtigsten Verteidigungseinrichtungen gegenüber Räubern darstellen, bedeutet das Aufgeben dieser Verhaltensweisen zu Beginn der Dämmerung, daß während der Nacht kleinere Riffische weniger bedroht sind als während des Tages. Für wandernde Schwarmfische dürfte eine geringe Variabilität der Verhaltensweisen von adaptiver Bedeutung sein. Nur durch ein koordiniertes Schwarmverhalten ist es offensichtlich möglich, innerhalb bestimmter Grenzen auf die verschieden optischen Marken, welche die Wanderwege kennzeichnen, zu reagieren. Vermutlich spielen die topographischen Gegebenheiten unter Wasser eine entscheidende Rolle für die Orientierung der Riffische.

Summary

1. Many tropical reef fishes that feed during the day rest at night, whereas many that feed at night rest during the day. The feeding grounds of many are some distance from their resting grounds. Thus they migrate between these two locations during twilight as part of a general changeover between diurnal and nocturnal situations.

2. At least many of these migrations are predictable, both as to time and to the route taken. The distances traveled vary between species, ranging from just a few meters, to more than several kilometers.

3. The pattern of migrations is strongly influenced by the relative threat from predators at different periods of the diel cycle.

4. During the day, migrations of reef fishes are limited to intra-reef movements: short vertical movements by certain plankton feeders, and lateral excursions from one part of the reef to another by certain herbivores and plankton feeders. Movements into the open regions that lie adjacent to many reefs are not adaptive in daylight due largely to a danger from predators.

5. Despite constant threat from predators during the day, smaller reef fishes remain relatively secure during most of this period by staying close to shelter, or by schooling. However, these defenses are less effective during twilight, when the danger from predators intensifies. The diurnal migrators return to the shelter of their resting places prior to that part of evening twilight when danger is greatest, and the nocturnal migrators usually do not expose themselves for their nightly foraging until after the period of maximum danger has passed. During morning twilight the sequence is reversed.

6. The major mechanisms whereby smaller reef fishes reduce predation during the day — schooling and staying close to shelter — are less evident at night. Not only do reef fishes range freely at night into the open regions that are avoided in daylight, but their schools are more loosely defined, and many are active as solitary individuals or in small groups. The tendency for looser associations and ranging farther afield increases on darker nights.

7. Most predators that threaten reef fishes are visual feeders whose mode of attack loses effectiveness when light falls below a certain level. Although they operate to some extent under moonlight, they threaten small reef fishes less at night than during the day.

8. In addition to whatever other ways a shcool may be adaptive, by reducing variable behavior among its members the school is especially important to migrating species. Responses to the various cues that mark the migration routes may be refined to within acceptable limits for the population as a whole only by coordinated group action.

9. Submarine topographical features are important reference points for migrating reef fishes.

Literature cited

  • Bardach, J. E., 1958. On the movements of certain Bermuda reef fishes. Ecology39, 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breder, C. M., 1967. On the survival value of fish schools. Zoologica, N. Y.52, 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I., 1962. Freiwasserbeobachtungen zur Deutung Fische. Z. Tierpsychol.19, 165–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, A. R., 1968. Preliminary observations on coral reef plankton. Limnol. Oceanogr.13 293–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, E. S., 1965. Diurnal-nocturnal activity of some inshore fishes in the Gulf of California. Copeia1965, 291–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1966. Visual orientation and feeding in seals and sea lions. Nature, Lond.210, 326–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, 1968. Predatory behavior of some shore fishes in the Gulf of California. Res. Rep. U. S. Fish Wildl. Serv.73, 1–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1972. Activity of Hawaiian reef fishes during the evening and morning transitions between daylight and darkness. Fish. Bull. U. S.70, 715–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longley, W. H., 1927. Life on a coral reef. Natn. geogr. Mag.51, 61–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manteifel, B. P. &Radakov, D. V., 1961. The adaptive significance of schooling behavior in fishes. Russ. Rev. Biol.50, 338–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, J. E., 1948. Schooling behavior in fishes. Q. Rev. Biol.23, 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, J. E., 1961. Tagging reef fishes in the Virgin Islands. Proc. Caribb. Fish. Inst.14, 201–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1965. Grazing effect on sea grasses by herbivorous reef fishes in the West Indies. Ecology46, 255–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— &Brock, V. E., 1960. Observations on the biology of epinepheline and lutjanid fishes of the Society Islands, with emphasis on food habits. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc.89, 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springer, V. E. &McErlean A. J., 1962. A study of the behavior of some tagged south Florida coral reef fishes. Am. Midl. Nat.67, 286–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starck, W. A. &Davis, W. P., 1966. Night habits of fishes of Alligator Reef, Florida. Ichthyol. Aquar. J.38, 313–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steven, D. M., 1959. Studies on the shoaling behavior of fish. I. Responses of two species to changes of illumination and to olfactory stimuli. J. exp. Biol.36, 261–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thines, G. &Vandenbussche, E., 1966. The effects of alarm substance on the schooling behavior ofRasbora heteromorpha Dunker in day and night conditions. Anim. Behav.14, 296–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welty, J. C., 1934. Experiments in group behavior of fishes. Physiol. Zoöl.7, 85–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C., 1957. Homing behavior of California rocky shore fishes. Univ. Calif. Publs Zool.59, 249–284.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hobson, E.S. Diel feeding migrations in tropical reef fishes. Helgolander Wiss. Meeresunters 24, 361–370 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01609526

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01609526

Keywords