Skip to main content
  • Published:

Erythrotrichopeltis, eine neue Gattung der Erythropeltidaceae (Bangiophyceae, Rhodophyta)

Erythrotrichopeltis, a new genus of the Erythropeltidaceae (Bangiophyceae, Rhodophyta)

Abstract

In culture experimentsErythropeltis discigera (Berth.) Schmitz andErythrotrichia discigera Berth. proved to be heteromorphous stages in the life history of the same entity, incorporated into the new genusErythrotrichopeltis. There is no obligate alternation of generations, the peltoid and the trichoid phase both propagate asexually by monospores. In addition, the trichoid phase releases spermatia in abundance, while carpogonia cannot be distinguished from vegetative cells. Thus far, the present statements are in full accordance with Berthold's observations, made at Naples more than 100 years ago, which have, however, recently been challenged. Moreover, the cultivation experiments made supplement Berthold's results as to the post fertilization process. A few days after the appearance of spermatia, peltoid plants are met with among the filamentous ones: they obviously originate from carpospores. The transition of the peltoid to the trichoid phase, at first observed accidentally in 3-month old moribund cultures, was reconstructed on more than one occasion by designed experiments. This study was started with discoid plants isolated from crude cultures of sublitoral algae from Helgoland (North Sea). NeitherErythrotrichia discigera Berth. norErythropeltis discigera (Berth.) Schmitz were ever found in the field around Helgoland. Recognized by Batters to be identical withBangia ciliaris Carmichael, the name of the typical representative of the new genus isErythrotrichopeltis ciliaris (Carm. ex Harv. in Hook.) nov. comb.

Zitierte literatur

  • Ardré, F., 1970. Contribution à l'étude des algues marines du Portugal. I — La flore. — Port. Acta biol. (B)10, 1–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baardseth, E., 1941. The marine algae of Tristan da Cunha. — Results Norw. scient. Exped. Tristan da Cunha9, 1–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batters, E. A. L., 1900. New or critical British marine algae. — J. Bot.38, 369–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthold, G., 1882. Die Bangiaceen des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte. — Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel8, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Børgesen, F., 1927. Marine algae from the Canary Islands. III. Rhodophyceae. — Biol. Meddr6, (6), 1–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, K. & Conway, E., 1980. Studies in the Bangiaceae: Reproductive Modes. — Botanica mar.23, 545–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dangeard, P., 1932. Sur quelquesErythrotrichia etErythrocladia de Banyuls et du Croisic. — Botaniste24, 143–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dangeard, P., 1968. Recherches sur quelques Bangiophycées (Protofloridées). — Botaniste51, 5–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dangeard, P., 1969. Observations nouvelles sur les Bangiophycées. — Botaniste52, 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P. S., 1973. Biology of the Rhodophyta. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh, 285 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P. S. & Murray, S. N., 1981. Life histories in the Erythropeltidaceae (Rhodophyta, Bangiophyceae). — Proc. int. Seaweed Symp.8, 93–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldmann, J., 1939. Les algues marines de la côte des Albères. IV. Rhodophycées. — Revue algol.11, 247–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, F. E., 1945. The structure and reproduction of the algae. Univ. Press, Cambridge,2, 1–939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., 1924. Floridées des France — Bangiales. — Revue algol.1, 278–292; 427–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, H. W., 1851. Phycologia Britannica. London,3, pl. 241–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heerebout, G. R., 1968. Studies on the Erythropeltidaceae (Rhodophyceae — Bangiophycidae). — Blumea16, 139–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, W. J., 1833. British Flora. London,2.

  • Howe, M. A., 1914. The marine algae of Peru. — Mem. Torrey bot. Club15, 1–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapraun, D. F., 1980. An illustrated guide to the benthic marine algae of coastal North Carolina. I. Rhodophyta. UNC Press, Chapel Hill, 206 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kylin, H., 1956. Die Gattungen der Rhodophyceen. Gleerup, Lund, 673 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Jolis, A., 1863. Liste des algues marines de Cherbourg. Paris, 168 pp.

  • Levring, T., 1960. Reports of the Lund University Chile expedition 1948–49. 39. Contributions to the marine algal flora of Chile. — Lunds Univ. Årsskr. (N. F., Avd. 2.)56 (10), 1–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, H. W. & Lissant, E. K., 1967. Developmental studies ofErythrocladia Rosenvinge in culture. — J. Phycol.3, 6–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oltmanns, F., 1922. Morphologie und Biologie der Algen. II. Phaeophyceae — Rhodophyceae. Fischer, Jena, 439 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papenfuss, G. F., 1951. Notes on South African marine algae. III. — Jl S. Afr. Bot.17, 167–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, F., 1896. Bangiaceae. In: Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Hrsg. von A. Engler & K. Prantl. Engelmann, Leipzig,1 (2), 307–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, W. R., 1945. Pacific marine algae of the Allan Hancock expeditions to the Galapagos Islands. — Allan Hancock Pacif. Exped.12, 1–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, W. R., 1957. Marine algae of the northeastern coast of North America. Univ. of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 509 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, W. R., 1960. Marine algae of the eastern tropical and subtropical coasts of the Americas. Univ. of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 870 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kornmann, P. Erythrotrichopeltis, eine neue Gattung der Erythropeltidaceae (Bangiophyceae, Rhodophyta). Helgolander Meeresunters 38, 207–224 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01997481

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01997481