Skip to main content
  • Published:

Zur Ultrastruktur der seitlichen Sinnesorgane am Augenhügel vonAnoplodactylus pygmaeus (Pycnogonida)

Ultrastructure of the lateral sense organs on the ocular tubercle ofAnoplodactylus pygmaeus (Pycnogonida)

Abstract

Former light microscopic studies on the lateral sense organs of sea spiders yielded divergent results. Consequently, different authors ascribed different functions to these organs. The present ultrastructural study shows that each lateral sense organ ofA. pygmaeus consists of approximately 15 sensory cells of two different types, approximately 20 sheath cells with numerous long microvilli, and an outer cuticular covering. Essentially the same elements are characteristic features of arthropod sensilla. There are, however, differences between the sense organs described in this paper and the sense organs of other arthropods. The inner dendritic segments of sensory cells S1 of theA. pygmaeus lateral sense organs are very short, the sensory cilia are invaginated, and the pericarya of the sensory cells contain electron lucent cytoplasmic regions with large granules (glycogen?). In addition, the lateral sense organs ofA. pygmaeus lack a marked receptor lymph cavity and junctions between the cells. The results of the present ultrastructural study clearly indicate that the lateral sense organs ofA. pygmaeus are not glands as was postulated for other sea spider species by earlier authors. Some investigators hypothesized that the lateral sense organs of other sea spider species were auditory organs or rudimentary eyes. The present results do not support such speculations. Some structural details of the sensory cells ofA. pygmaeus resemble those found in chemoreceptive or putative chemoreceptive organs of other arthropods. Accordingly, chemoreceptive or thermoreceptive functions should be taken into consideration for the lateral sense organs ofA. pygmaeus.

Zitierte literatur

  • Altner, H. & Prillinger, L., 1980. Ultrastructure of invertebrate chemo-, thermo-, and hygroreceptors and its functional significance. — Int. Rev. Cytol.67, 69–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altner, H. & Thies, G., 1978. The multifunctional sensory complex in the antennae ofAllacma fusca (Insecta). — Zoomorphologie91, 119–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dohrn, A., 1881. Die Pantopoden des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte. — Fauna Flora Golf Neapel3, 1–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eloffson, R., 1966. The nauplius eye and frontal organs of the non-Malacostraca (Crustacea). — Sarsia25, 1–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, D. & Everingham, J. W., 1972. Fine structure of crab olfactory cilia: Non-chemical fixation; environmental effects. In: Olfaction and taste. Ed. by D. Schneider, Wiss. Verl. Ges., Stuttgart, 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaill, F., 1980. Glycogen and degeneration in the pyloric gland ofDendrodoa grossularia (Ascidiaceae, Tunicata). — Cell Tiss. Res.208, 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Cr., 1981. A variation of the smooth septate junction in sea-spidersAmmothea clausi (Pycnogonida). — Tissue Cell13, 189–195.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanström, B., 1919. Zur Kenntnis des zentralen Nervensystems der Arachnoiden und Pantopoden nebst Schlußfolgerungen betreffs der Phylogenie der genannten Gruppen. Diss., Univ. Lund, 191 pp.

  • Haupt, J., 1973. Die Ultrastruktur des Pseudoculus vonAllopauropus (Pauropoda) und die Homologie der Schläfenorgane. — Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere76, 173–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimann, P., 1979. Fine structure of sensory tubes on the antennule ofConchoecia spinirostris (Ostracoda, Crustacea). — Cell Tiss. Res.202, 461–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfer, H. & Schlottke, E., 1935. IV Pantopoda. — Bronn's Kl. Ordn. Tierreichs5, 1–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P., 1905. Über den Bau der Hydrachnidenaugen. — Zool. Jb. (Anat. Ontogenie Tiere)21, 453–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laverack, M. S., 1974. The structure and function of chemoreceptor cells. In: Chemoreception in marine organisms. Ed. by P. T. Grant & A. M. Mackie. Acad. Press, New York, 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loman, J. C. C., 1907. Biologische Beobachtungen an einem Pantopoden. — Tijdschr. ned. dierk. Vereen.10, 255–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, A., 1977. Extra-ocular photoreceptors in cephalopods. — Symp. zool. Soc. Lond.38, 287–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K.-E. & Bückmann, D., 1963. Die Häutungen des PantopodenPycnogonum litorale (Ström.). — Zool. Anz. (Suppl.)26, 604–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, E. S., 1963. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. — J. Cell Biol.17, 208–212.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H.-W. & Brückmann, D., 1971. Beobachtungen zur Lebensweise vonPycnogonum litorale (Ström.) (Pantopoda). — Oecologia7, 242–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönrock, G.-U., 1981. Feinstruktur und Entwicklung der antennalen Sensillen beiPolydesmus coriaceus Porath 1871 (Diplopoda, Polydesmida). Diss., F. U. Berlin, 237 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolow, I., 1911. Über den Bau der Pantopodenaugen. — Z. wiss. Zool.98, 339–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J. H., 1978. Experiments on food preference and chemical sense in Pycnogonida. — J. Linn. Soc. Zool.63, 59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirén, E., 1918. Zur Morphologie und Phylogenie der Pantopoden. — Zool. Bidr., Upps.6, 41–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida, M., 1979. Extraocular photoreception. In: Handbook of sensory physiology. Ed. by H. Autrum. Springer,7, 6A, Berlin, 581–640.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richter, S. Zur Ultrastruktur der seitlichen Sinnesorgane am Augenhügel vonAnoplodactylus pygmaeus (Pycnogonida). Helgolander Meeresunters 35, 465–478 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01999135

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01999135