Skip to main content
  • Benthic Ecosystems
  • Published:

Benthic community modification and recovery following intensive grazing byStrongylocentrotus droebachiensis

Abstract

IntensiveStrongylocentrotus droebachiensis grazing of a previously sampled one-hectare plot provided an opportunity for quantitatively investigating grazing impact on the benthic macrophyte community and community recovery. The changes induced by grazing are compared with changes in a similar plot located nearby which was not grazed. A total of 154 quantitative 0.25 m2 quadrats were collected in mid-summer, from the two sites, over a 4-year period. The results presented indicate thatS. droebachiensis populations in the Strait of Georgia undergo periodic, environmentally controlled, outbreaks and that these outbreaks are responsible for localized perturbation of the benthic macrophyte community. Short-term grazing, where the urchins do not remain in the area, result in a 60 percent reduction in most community parameters measured. The community requires 2 or 3 years to regain or exceed pre-grazing biomass levels while other parameters had not recovered after 3 years. An estimated 4–6 year period is required to achieve “ecological climax” (Fishelson, 1977) and “species enrichment” follows. The largest macrophyte in the Strait of Georgia, the kelpNereocystis luetkeana, is a successional species whose abundance is controlled, in part, by the successional status of the community.

Literature Cited

  • Breen, P. A. & Mann, K. H., 1976. Changing lobster abundance and the destruction of kelp beds. Mar. Biol.34, 137–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Columbia Research Council (ed.), 1948. Marine plants of economic importance in British Columbia coastal waters, Part II. Tech. Bull. Br. Columb. Res. Coun.10, 1–37.

  • Burrows, E. M., 1971. Assessment of pollution effects by the use of algae. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. (B)177, 295–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castric-Fey, A., 1974. Les peuplements sessiles du benthos rocheux de L'Archipel de Glenan (Sud Bretagne) ecologie descriptive et experimentale. Thèse, Univ. Paris, 333 pp.

  • Clifford, H. T. & Stephenson, W., 1975. An introduction to numerical classification. Acad. Press, New York, 229 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishelson, L., 1977. Stability and instability of marine ecosystems, illustrated by examples from the Red Sea. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters.30, 18–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foreman, R. E., & Lindstrom, S. C., 1973. Urchin survey report. Rep. Fish. Res. Bd Pacif. biol. Stn1973, 1–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, M. S., 1975. Algal succession in aMacrocystis pyrifera forest. Mar. Biol.32, 313–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelman, J. H., 1976. Factors regulating the reproductive cycles of some west coast invertebrates. Thesis, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, 128 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • — & Steele, D. H., 1971. Foods and predators of the green sea urchinStronglyocentrotus droebachiensis in Newfoundland waters. Mar. Biol.9, 315–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollister, H. J. & Sandnes, A. M., 1972. Sea surface temperatures and salinities at shore stations on the British Columbia coast 1914–1970. Environm. Can. pacif. mar. Sci. Rep.72-13, 1–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummon, W. D., 1974. SH' A similarity index based on shared species diversity, used to assess temporal and spatial relations among intertidal marine gastrotricha. Oecologia17, 203–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, N. S. & Kain, J. M., 1967. Subtidal algal colonization following the removal ofEchinus. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters.15, 460–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, K. H., 1972. Ecological energetics of the seaweed zone in a marine bay on the Atlantic Coast of Canada. I. Zonation and biomass of seaweeds. Mar. Biol.12, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1977. Destruction of kelp-beds by sea-urchins: A cyclical phenomenon or irreversible degradation? Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters.30, 455–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. J. & Mann, K. H., 1973. Ecological energetics of the seaweed zone in a marine bay on the Atlantic Coast of Canada. III. Energy transformations by sea urchins. Mar. Biol.18, 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, R. T. & Vadas, R. L., 1969. The effects of grazing by sea urchins,Stronglyocentrotus spp., on benthic algal populations. Limnol. Oceanogr.14, 710–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, J. H., 1973. Advances in the study of benthic marine algae since the time of E. M. Holmes. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.67, 47–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, W., 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana, 117 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, R. E., 1972. Studies on the development of the sea urchinStronglyocentrotus droebachiensis. I. Ecology and normal development. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole142, 132–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadas, R. L., 1968. The ecology ofAgarum and the kelp bed community. Ph. D thesis, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, 282 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foreman, R.E. Benthic community modification and recovery following intensive grazing byStrongylocentrotus droebachiensis . Helgolander Wiss. Meeresunters 30, 468–484 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02207855

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02207855

Keywords