Skip to main content
  • Published:

Postembryonic development of the parasitic amphipodHyperia galba

Abstract

Hyperia galba Montagu is associated with gelatinous zooplankton as are many species of the Hyperiidea. The hosts preferred in the European seas are the large scyphomedusaeAurelia aurita, Chrysaora hysoscella, Rhizostoma pulmo, Cyanea capillata andCyanea lamarckii, which harbour the first developmental stages. The anamorphic development produces young that are incapable of swimming at the time of hatching. They are characterized by an embryonic abdomen without extremities and external segmentation; the eyes are not completely developed and the mouth is primitive lacking bristles, molar and incisor. The postembryonic development, described in detail, is subdivided into two phases: the pantochelis phase and the protopleon phase; the former comprises only one stage; the latter can be subdivided into four stages. In the course of postnatal development the larval organs are reduced and characters typical of the adult are gradually differentiated.H. galba plays an important role as obligatory endoparasite of scyphomedusae at least during the first stages of development; without a host this amphipod cannot survive, neither benthically nor in the plankton. The transition from life in the female's marsupium to endoparasitism in the jellyfish generally occurs during stage of the postembryonic development which is the first stage of the protopleon phase. The specific adaptations of its reproductive biology to a parasitic mode of life such as moult inhibition under starvation, development of larval organs and the behavioural patterns of the females as well as the young are described. Further, the influence of external factors such as temperature and food supply on the course of development is examined.

Literature Cited

  • Alvarado, R., 1955. El “cangrejito” de las medusas. — Boln R. Soc. esp. Hist. nat.,53, 219–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bate, C. & Westwood, J., 1868. A history of the British sessile-eyed Crustacea., II Van Voorst, Lond., 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovallius, C. 1889. Contribution to a monograph of the Amphipoda Hyperiidea, part I: 2. The families Cyllopodidae, Paraphronimidae, Thaumatopsidae, Mimonectidae, Hyperiidae, Phronimidae und Anchylomeridae. — K. svenska VetenskAkad. Handl.,22 (7), 129–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, R. P., 1977. Structural observations on the alimentary canal ofParanthessius anemoniae, a copepod associate of the snakelocks anemoneAnemonia sulcata. — J. Zool., Lond.182, 353–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, E. 1959a. The hyperiid amphipod,Hyperia galba, a true ectoparasite on jelly-fish. — Univ. Bergen Årb.28, 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, E., 1959b. The amphipod,Hyperia galba, an ectoparasite of the jelly-fish,Cyanea capillata. —Nature Lond.,183, 1749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittrich, B., 1983. Ökologische Untersuchungen an Kleincrustaceen im litoralen Benthos des Capo Caccia/Sardinien. Dipl. Arb. Univ. Bochum, 161 pp.

  • Dittrich, B., 1986. Beiträge zur Biologie und Ökologie vonHyperia galba (Montagu, 1813). Diss. Univ. Bochum, 202 pp.

  • Goormaghtigh, E. & Parmentier, M. 1973. Le crustacé amphipodeHyperia galba, “parasite” de la méduseRhizostoma octopus. — Naturalistes belg.54, 131–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosse, P. H., 1853. Naturalist's rambles on the Devonshire coast. London, 366–368.

  • Harbison, G. R., 1976. Development ofLycaea pulex Marion, 1874 andLycaea vincentii Stebbing, 1888 (Amphipoda, Hyperiidea). — Bull. mar. Sci.,26, 152–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollowday, E. D., 1947. On the commensal relationship between the amphipodHyperia galba (Mont.) and the scyphomedusaRhizostoma pulmo Agassiz,var. octopus Oken. — J. Quekett microsc. Club (Ser. 4)2, 187–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, J., 1963. Stages in the early development ofParathemisto gaudichaudii (Guér.) (Crustacea Amphipoda: Hyperiidea), the development of secondary sexual characters and of the ovary. —Trans. R. Soc. N. Z. (Zool.)3, 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laval, P., 1963. Sur la biologie et les larves deVibilia armata Bov. et deV. propinqua Stebb., Amphipodes Hypérides. — C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris257, 1389–1392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laval, P., 1965. Présence d' une période larvaire au début du développement de certains Hypérides parasites (Crustacés Amphipodes). — C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris260, 6195–6198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laval, P., 1968. Développement en élevage et systématique d'Hyperia schizogeneios Stebb. (Amphipode Hypéride). — Archs. Zool. exp. gén.109, 25–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laval, P., 1980. Hyperiid amphipods as crustacean parasitoids associated with gelatinous zooplankton. — Oceanogr. mar. Biol.18, 11–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauchline, J. & Ballantyne, A. R. S., 1975. The integumental organs of amphipods. — J. mar. biol. Ass. U. K.55, 345–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, P., 1967. On the relations betweenHyperia galba Montagu (Amphipoda, Hyperiidae) and its hostAurelia aurita in the Isefjord Area (Sjaelland, Denmark). — Vidensk. Meddr dansk naturh. Foren.130, 85–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller, H., 1978/1979. Significance of coelenterates in relation to other plankton organisms. —Meeresforsch.27, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirlot, J. M., 1932. Introduction á l' étude des Amphipodes Hypérides. — Annls Inst. océanogr., Monaco12, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, E., 1973. Svstematics and ecology of the Isefjord. — Ophelia11, 1–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanes, G., 1877. An account of some new species, varieties and monstrous forms of medusae, II. —J. Linn. Soc. (Zool.)13, 190–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, V., 1973. Entwicklungsgeschichte der Tiere. Thieme, Stuttgart, 414 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheader, M., 1973. North sea hyperiid amphipods. — Proc. Challenger Soc.4, 247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheader, M., 1977. Breeding and marsupial development in laboratory-maintainedParathemisto gaudichaudi (Amphipoda). — J. mar. biol. Ass. U. K.,57, 943–954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheader, M. & Chia, F., 1970. Development, fecundity and brooding behaviour of the amphipod,Marinogammarus obtusatus. — J. mar. biol. Ass. U. K.50, 1079–1099.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowsky, A., 1900. Die Amphipoden Helgolands. — Wiss. Meeresunters. (Abt. Helgoland)4, 143–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiel, M. E., 1976. Wirbellose Meerestiere als Parasiten, Kommensalen oder Symbionten in oder an Scyphomedusen. — Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters.28, 417–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vader, W., 1983. Associations between amphipods (Crustacea: Amphipoda) and sea anemones (Anthozoa, Actinaria). — Mem. Austr. Mus.18, 141–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westernhagen, H. von, 1976. Some aspects of the biology of the hyperiid amphipodHyperoche medusarum. — Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters.28, 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, M. G. & Bone, D. G., 1972. The interrelationship ofHyperia galba (Crustacea, Amphipoda) andDesmonema gaudichaudi (Scyphomedusae, Semaeostomae) from the Antarctic. — Br. Antarct. Surv. Bull.27, 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated to Prof. Dr. H. Mergner on the occasion of his 70th birthday.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dittrich, B. Postembryonic development of the parasitic amphipodHyperia galba . Helgolander Meeresunters 41, 217–232 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02364701

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02364701

Keywords