Skip to main content
  • Published:

Ultrastructure of spermatozoa and spermiogenesis inSpirula spirula (L.): systematic importance and comparison with other cephalopods

Abstract

Spermatozoa and spermiogenesis in the deep-water cephalopodSpirula sprirula (L.) are examined using transmission electron microscopy. Mature spermatozoa (taken from spermatophores) are elongate cells 115–120 μm long, composed of a conical acrosomal vesicle, cylindrical nucleus (6.8–7 μm long), flagellum and a loose mitochondrial sleeve — the latter concealing the proximal 6–8 μm of the flagellum. The acrosomal vesicle is 2.8 μm long with fibro-granular contents and an electron-lucent apical zone. Subacrosomal material, organized as closely packed granules, fills a basal invagination of the acrosomal vesicle. In early spermatids the flagellum is derived from a triplet substructure centriole positioned close to the developing nuclear invagination. As flagellum formation proceeds, the acrosomal vesicle (produced evidently through Golgi secretion) attaches to the condensing nucleus. Spermatids are connected by cytoplasmic bridges throughout their development, and exhibit a perinuclear sheath of microtubules from the onset of the fibrous stage of nuclear condensation (mid-, late spermatids). In mid-spermatids, mitochondria collect posterior to the nucleus and subsequently are packed into a cylindrical extension of the plasma membrane to form the periflagellar mitochondrial sleeve. These features of spermiogenesis and mature spermatozoa ofSpirula clearly associate the Spirulidae with the Sepiida, Teuthida and Sepiolida — particularly with the latter order. However, pending results of a thorough review of coleoid sperm morphology, the Spirulidae are here included in their own order — Spirulida (of Reitner & Engeser, 1982) — rather than in either the Sepiida or Sepiolida.

Literature Cited

  • Arnold, J. M. & Williams-Arnold, L. D., 1978. Spermiogenesis ofNautilus pompilius. I. General survey. — J. exp. Zool.205, 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandel, K., 1985. Cephalopod morphology and function. In: Mollusks. Ed. by T. W. Broadhead, Univ. Tennessee, Dept. Geol. Sci., Knoxville, 190–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandel, K. & Boletzky, S. von, 1979. A comparative study of the structure, development and morphological relationships of chambered cephalopod shells. — Veliger21, 313–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandel, K. & Leich, H., 1986. Jurassic Vampyromorpha (dibranchiate cephalopods). — N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Mh.3, 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, B. H. & Arnold, J. M., 1974. Nonkinetochore association of chromatin and microtubules: a preliminary note. — J. Cell Biol.62, 917–920.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boss, K. J., 1982. Mollusca. In: Synopsis and classification of living organisms. Ed. by S. P. Parker. McGraw-Hill, New York,2, 945–1166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunn, A. Fr. von, 1943. The biology ofSpirula spirula (L.). — Dana Rep.24, 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M. R., 1970. Growth and development ofSpirula spirula. — J. mar. biol. Ass. U. K.50, 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M. R., 1988. Evolution of Recent cephalopods—a brief review. In: The Mollusca. Ed. by M. R. Clarke & E. R. Trueman. Acad. Press, New York,12, 331–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M. R. & Trueman, E. R., 1988. Introduction. In: The Mollusca. Ed. by M. R. Clarke & E. R. Trueman. Acad. Press, New York,12, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denton, E. J. & Gilpin-Brown, J. B., 1971. Further observations on the buoyancy ofSpirula. — J. mar. biol. Ass. U. K.51, 363–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denton, E. J., Gilpin-Brown, J. B. & Howarth, J. V., 1967. On the buoyancy ofSpirula spirula. — J. mar. biol. Ass. U. K.47, 181–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, D. T., 1977. Evolution of the dibranchiate Cephalopoda. In: The biology of cephalopods. Ed. by M. Nixon & J. B. Messenger. Acad. Press, New York, 15–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeser, T. S., 1988. Fossil “octopods” — a critical review. In: The Mollusca. Ed. by M. R. Clarke & E. R. Trueman. Acad. Press, New York,12, 81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, W. G. & Thompson, K. A., 1976. Ultrastructure and functional morphology of spermatozoa ofRossia pacifica (Cephalopoda, Decapoda). — Can. J. Zool.54, 908–932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fioroni, P., 1981. Die Sonderstellung der Sepiolen, ein Vergleich der Ordnungen der rezenten Cephalopoden. — Zool. Jb. (Abt. Syst. Ökol. Geogr. Tiere)108, 178–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzén, A., 1955. Comparative morphological investigations into the spermiogenesis among Mollusca. — Zool. Bidr. Uppsala30, 399–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzén, A., 1967. Spermiogenesis and spermatozoa of the Cephalopoda. — Ark. Zool.19, 323–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galangau, M. V., 1969. Étude en microscope électronique de la gamétogenèse deMilax gagates Drap. (Gastéropodes, Pulmonés, Limicidae). Évolution des ultrastructures au cours de la spermatogénèse chez différents types de Mollusques. Thése Univ. de Montpellier, 152 pp.

  • Galangau, V. & Tuzet, O., 1968a. L'acrosome d'Octopus vulgaris Lmk. Observations au microscope électronique. — C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris (D)267, 1462–1467.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galangau, V. & Tuzet, O., 1968b. Les mitochondries pendant la spermatogenése d'Octopus vulgaris Lmk. Recherches au microscope électronique. — C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris, (D)267, 1735–1737.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, J. M., 1989. Spermatozoa of the deep-sea cephalopodVampyroteuthis infernalis Chun: ultrastructure and possible phylogenetic significance. — Phil. Trans R. Soc.323, 589–600.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, J. M., 1990. Ultrastructure of spermiogenesis inVampyroteuthis infernalis Chun, a relict cephalopod mollusc. — Helgoländer Meeresunters.44, 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeletzky, J. A., 1966. Comparative morphology, phylogeny and classification of fossil Coleoidea. —Paleont. Contr. Univ. Kans.7, 1–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longo, F. J. & Anderson, E., 1970. Structural and cytochemical features of the sperm of the cephalopodOctopus bimaculatus. — J. Ultrastruct. Res.32, 94–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, W. L., 1974. Spermiogenesis ofEledone cirrhosa Lamarck (Cephalopoda, Octopoda). —Proc. R. Soc. Lond. (B)186, 181–190.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, W. L., 1975. Spermiogenesis ofEusepia officinalis (L.),Loligo forbesi (Steenstrup) andAlloteuthis subulata (L.) (Cephalopoda, Decapoda). — Proc. R. Sóc. Lond. (B)191, 527–535.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mutvei, H., 1964. On the shells ofNautilus andSpirula with notes on the shell secretion in noncephalopod molluscs. — Ark. Zool.16, 221–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, G. E. & Linck, R. W., 1980. Membrane differentiations in spermatozoa of the squid,Loligo pealeii. — Gamete Res.3, 329–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitner, J. & Engeser, T., 1982. Phylogenetic trends in phragmocone-bearing coleoids (Belemnomorpha). — N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh.164, 156–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J. 1922. Live specimens ofSpirula. — Nature, Lond,110, 788–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichert, C., 1988. Main features of cephalopod evolution. In: The Mollusca. Ed. by M. R. Clarke & E. R. Trueman, Acad. Press, New York,12, 11–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, G. L., 1977. Classification of Recent Cephalopoda. Appendix II. In: The biology of cephalopods. Ed. by M. Nixon & J. M. Messenger. Acad. Press, New York, 575–579.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Healy, J.M. Ultrastructure of spermatozoa and spermiogenesis inSpirula spirula (L.): systematic importance and comparison with other cephalopods. Helgolander Meeresunters 44, 109–123 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02365434

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02365434

Keywords