Skip to main content
  • Published:

Four new dinoflagellates

Abstract

Fragilidium fissile is a new species of this rare genus. It somewhat resemblesF. subglobosum. It differs from the latter in having a slot and a pore in the first apical plate 1′ (the nomenclature of dinoflagellate plate designation follows the Kofoid system). Both species are also distinguishable by noticeable differences in Po, 1″″ and 1‴.Peridinium tyrrhenicum is a small species differing from all the other known species ofPeridinium in its shape, apical channel and several plates, especially some of the sulcal components.Alexandrium foedum somewhat resemblesA. balechii, but it differs from the latter in that its width is greater than its length, and in the characters of all the main sulcal plates. The above listed species were found in a sample from the Tyrrhenian Sea. The fourth species,Alexandrium andersoni, is a small dinoflagellate obtained in coastal waters off Cape Cod. It differs from all the other species of the minutum group in the very typical shapes of both the 6″ and the S. s.Pentapharsodinium daleii Indelicato and Loeblich is transferred toPeridinium.

Literature Cited

  • Balech, E., 1958. Two new genera of dinoflagellates from California. — Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole116, 195–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balech, E., 1985. The genusAlexandrium orGonyaulax of the tamarensis group. In: Toxic dinoflagellates. Ed. by D. M. Anderson, A. W. White & D. G. Baden. Elsevier, New York, 32–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balech, E., 1988. Una especie nueva del géneroFragilidium (Dinoflagellata) de la bahía de Chamela, Jalisco, México. — An. Inst. Biol. Univ. México (Ser. Zool.)58, 479–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balech, E. & Oliveira Soares, L., 1966. Dos dinoflagelados de la bahía de Guanabara y proximidades (Brasil). — Neotropica12 (39), 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, E. R. & Arnott, H. J., 1971. The ultrastructure of the theca of the marine dinoflagellateEnsiculifera loeblichii sp. nov. In: Contribution in phycology. Ed. by B. C. Parker & R. M. Brown. Allen. Lawrence, Kan., 121–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, B., 1977. New observations onPeridinium faeroense Paulsen (1905) classification of small Orthoperidinioid dinoflagellates. — Br. phycol. J.12, 241–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, J. D., 1982. Marine dinoflagellates of the British Isles. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 303 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indelicato, S. R. & Loeblich, A. R., 1986. A revision of the marine peridinioid genera (Pyrrhophyta) utilizing hypothecal-cingular plates relationships as a taxonomic guideline. — Jap. J. Phycol.34, 153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, O., 1905. On some Peridineae and planktonic diatoms. — Meddr Kommn Havunders. (Ser. Plankton)1 (3), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steidinger, K. A., 1971.Gonyaulax balechii sp. nov. (Dinophyceae) with a discussion of the generaGonyaulax andHeteraulacus. — Phycologia10, 183–187.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balech, E. Four new dinoflagellates. Helgolander Meeresunters 44, 387–396 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02365475

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02365475

Keywords