Skip to main content
  • Published:

Distribution and development of some Manx epiphyte populations

Abstract

The success ofElachista fucicola as an epiphyte ofFucus vesiculosus is partly due to its ability to grow on most parts of the host thallus. Its ability to reach reproductive maturity quickly ensures its fitness, even on temporary structures such as receptacles. Epiphyte distribution may also vary with host morphology.Himanthalia elongata is a basiphyte for several tissue-specific epiphytes:Ectocarpus fasciculatus, Elachista scutulata, Herponema velutinum andMyriactula areschougii are exclusive, or almost so, to receptacles. On growing receptacles their specificity extends to conceptacles, which also provide refuges from grazing. Epiphyte abundance in summer is greatest at the upper and lower limits ofHimanthalia distribution, suggesting that basiphytes living under suboptimal conditions are more prone to infestation by epiphytes. 5–10% ofHimanthalia receptacles are thought to persist over winter and so to facilitate the transmission of epiphytes to the following year's crop of receptacles. The distribution ofEctocarpus fasciculatus onLaminaria digitata differs in pattern from that onHimanthalia. The twoEctocarpus populations also differ morphologically, but both have reproductive and developmental, characteristics that are in accord with the ecological cycles of their basiphytes. This characteristic is likely to be an important factor in determining the success of an epiphyte. Success may also be facilitated by epiphyte variability or by possession of a fixed but well-adapted phenotype. The very high incidence of brown algal epiphytes on growingHimanthalia receptacles does not reflect the composition of the surrounding algal vegetation. The possibility that some host-recognition mechanism operates cannot be discounted.

Literature Cited

  • Baker, J. R. J. & Evans, L. V. 1971. A myrionemoid variant ofEctocarpus fasciculatus Harv.—Br. phycol. J.,6, 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dangeard, P., 1931. Sur unEctocarpus parasite provoquant des tumeurs chez leLaminaria flexicaulis Ectocarpus deformans nov. sp.).—C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris,192, 59–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, M. W., 1987. Sexual reproduction: nuclear cycles and life-histories with particular reference to lower eukaryotes.—Biol. J. Linn. Soc.30, 181–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducker, S. C. & Knox, R. B., 1984. Epiphytism at the cellular level with special reference to algal epiphytes. In: Encyclopedia of plant physiology. N. S. Ed. by H.-F. Linskens & J. Heslop-Harrison, Springer, Berlin,17, 113–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ende, G. van den & Oorschot, R. V., 1963. Weitere Beobachtungen über den Epiphytenbewuchs vonHimanthalia elongata (L.) S. F. Gray.—Botanica mar.5, 111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, R. L., 1987. Seaweeds of the British Isles. Vol. 3: Fucophyceae (Phaeophyceae) Part I. British Museum (Natural History), London, 359 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, D. C., 1937. Observations onHimanthalia lorea (L.) Lyngb.—J. Linn. Soc. (Bot.)51, 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, W. H., 1871. Phycologia Britannica. Reeve, London,1.

  • Hutchinson, G. E., 1975. A treatise on limnology. III: Limnological botany. Wiley, London, 660 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaasund, E., 1965. Aspects of the marine algal vegetation of North Norway—Bot. Gothoburg.4, 1–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jephson, N. A. & Gray, P. W. G., 1977. Aspects of the ecology ofSargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt in the Solent region of the British Isles. I. The growth cycle and epiphytes. In: Biology of benthic organisms. Ed. by B. F. Keegan, P. O. Ceidigh & P. J. S. Boaden. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 367–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, M. & Parke, M. W., 1931. Manx algae. Liverpool Univ., Liverpool, 155 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, M. & Parke, M., 1950. A biological study ofFucus vesiculosus L. andF. serratus L.—J. mar. biol. Ass. U. K.29, 439–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornmann, P. & Sahling, P.-H., 1977. Meeresalgen von Helgoland. Benthische Grün-, Braun- und Rotalgen.—Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters.29, 1–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuckuck, P., 1956. Ectocarpaceen-Studien IV.Herponema, Kutzingiella nov. gen.,Farlowiella nov. gen.—Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters.5, 292–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, W., 1960. An underwater study of the epiphytes ofLaminaria hyperborea (Gunn.) Fosl.—Br. phycol. Bull.2, 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, B., 1952. Variation in chemical composition during the development ofHimanthalia elongata (L.) S. F. Gray—J. mar. biol. Ass. U. K.31, 29–34.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niell, F. X., 1977. Rocky intertidal benthic systems in temperate seas: A synthesis of their functional performances.—Helgoländer Meeresunters.,30, 315–333.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, T. A., Hiscock, K. & Kitching, J. A., 1977. The ecology of Lough Ine. XX. TheLaminaria forest at Carrigathorna.—J. Ecol.65, 919–941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, R., 1984. A study in ultra-ecology: microorganisms on the seagrassPosidonia oceanica (L.) Delile.—Mar. Ecol.5, 143–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth, R. J. & Montfrans, J. van, 1984. Epiphyte-seagrass relationships with an emphasis on the role of micrograzing: A review.—Aquat. Bot.18, 43–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, K. H. & Breen, C. M., 1983. An investigation of macrophyte, epiphyte and grazer interactions. In: Periphyton of freshwater ecosystems. Ed. by R. G. Wetzel. Junk, The Hague, 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rönnberg, O. & Ruokolanti, C., 1986. Seasonal variation of algal epiphytes and phenolic content ofFucus vesiculosus in a northern Baltic archipelago—Ann. bot. fenn.,23, 317–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, G., 1966. The genusEctocarpus in Britain. I. The attached form—J. mar. biol. Ass. U. K.46, 267–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, G., 1979. Heavy receptacles in estuarineFucus vesiculosus L.—Estuar. coast. mar. Sci.9, 659–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, G., 1983a. Formation of an ectocarpoid epiflora on blades ofLaminaria digitata—Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser.11, 181–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, G., 1983b. Parallel growth patterns in algal epiphytes andLaminaria blades.—Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser.13, 303–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, G., 1985. Recent evolutionary changes in the algae of the Baltic Sea—Br. phycol. J.20, 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, G. & Veltkamp, C. J., 1984. Epiphyte survival on skinshedding macrophytes.—Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser.18, 149–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieburth, J. M. & Conover, J. T., 1965.Sargassum tannin, an antibiotic which retards fouling.—Nature, Lond., 208, 52–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown, J., 1987. Plant population ecology. Longman, Harlow, 229 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southward, A. J., 1953. The ecology of some rocky shores in the south of the Isle of Man.—Proc. Trans. Lpool. biol. Soc.59, 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundene, O., 1964. The ecology ofLaminaria digitata in Norway in view of transplant experiments.—Nytt Mag. Bot.11, 83–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokida, J., 1960. Marine algae epiphyte on Laminariales plants.—Bull. Fac. Fish. Hokkaido Univ.11, 73–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel, R. G., 1983. Recommendations for future research on periphyton. In: Periphyton of fresh-water ecosystems. Ed. by R. G. Wetzel. Junk, The Hague, 339–346.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated to Dr. Dr. h. c. Peter Kornmann on the occasion of his eightieth birthday.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russell, G. Distribution and development of some Manx epiphyte populations. Helgolander Meeresunters 42, 477–492 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02365622

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02365622

Keywords