- Published:
Skeletal morphology of two controversial Poecilosclerid genera (Porifera, Demospongiae):Discorhabdella andCrambe
Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen volume 50, pages 369–390 (1996)
Abstract
The generaDiscorhabdella andCrambe are characterized by bearing uncommon spicule types, i.e. pseudoastrose acanthostyles and sphaeroclones, respectively. They have traditionally been considered to be unrelated taxa, but the present reexamination made evident that an important amount of skeletal features are shared by both. Some of these morphological features, such as the ornamentation on the point of the ectosomal subtylostyles, are reported for the first time. The study also revealed that a tuberose nature of the tyles of the main choanosomal megascleres could be a common ancestral condition in both genera. The morphology of the multi-toothed anchorate chelae showed a gradual transition across the species, suggesting that the morphological diversity in chelae was generated in these genera through a “palmate-anchorate-arcuate” evolutionary sequence. However, the forward or backward direction of this sequence remained unclear from the available evidence. Important levels of skeletal variability were found to affect many of the skeletal characters, especially in the genusCrambe. In some cases, this variability transgressed the limits theoretically defining a species, making evident that the traditional procedure just based on comparison of the skeletons becomes unreliable when tackling the taxonomy of these genera. Most of the skeletal variability seemed to correspond to genetic polymorphisms, except in the case ofC. acuata. In this taxon, the skeletal variability could be a result of the existence of a cryptic species, originated by a misconceived synonymy betweenC. acuata andC. chelastra. Besides the skeletal variability, the obscure taxonomic meaning of many skeletal features favored the existence of conflicting taxonomic proposals for the suprageneric location of these genera, depending on the author’s criteria. This study made evident that any subsequent attempt of phylogenetic inference should be based on an unweighted analysis of the available skeletal information.
Literature Cited
Bibiloni, M. A., 1990. Fauna de esponjas de las Islas Baleares. Variación cualitativa y cuantitativa de la población de esponjas en un gradiente batimétrico. Comparación Baleares-Costa Catalana. Diss., Univ. Barcelona, 483 pp.
Boury-Esnault, N., 1971. Spongiaires de la zone rocheuse de Banyuls-sur-Mer. II. Systématique. —Vie Milieu22, 287–350.
Boury-Esnault, N., Pansini, M. & Uriz, M. J., 1992. A newDiscorhabdella (Porifera, Demospongiae), a new Tethyan relict of pre-Messinian biota? — J. nat. Hist.26, 1–27.
Burton, M., 1929. Descriptions of South African sponges. Part II: The “Lithistidae”, with a critical survey of the desma-forming sponges. — Rep. Fish. mar. biol. Surv. S. Afr.7, 1–12.
Dendy, A., 1924. Porifera. Part I: Non-Antarctic sponges. — Br. antarct. Terra Nova Exped. 1910–1913 (Zool.)6, (3), 269–392.
Hajdu, E., Soest, R. W. M. van & Hooper, J. N. A., 1994. Proposal for a phylogenetic subordinal classification of poecilosclerid sponges. In: Sponges in time and space. Ed. by R. W. M. van Soest, Th. M. G. van Kempen & J. C. Braekman, Balkema, Rotterdam, 123–139.
Hinde, G. J. & Holmes, W. M., 1892. On the sponge remains in the Lower Tertiary Strata near Oamaru, New Zealand. — J. Linn. Soc. (Zool.)24, 177–262.
Laubenfels, M. W. de, 1936. A discussion of the sponge fauna of the Dry Tortugas in particular and the West Indies in general, with material for a revision of the families and orders of the Porifera. —Pap. Tortugas Lab.30 (467), 1–225.
Laubenfels, M. W. de, 1955. Porifera. In: Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Part E. Ed. by R. C. Moore. Geol. Soc. Am., New York, 21–212.
Lendenfeld, R. von, 1903. Tetraxonia. — Das Tierreich19, 1–168.
Lévi, C., 1958. Résultats scientifiques des campagnes de la “Calypso”. Campagne 1951–1952 en Mer Rouge. Spongiaires de Mer Rouge. — Annls Inst. océanogr. Monaco34, 3–46.
Lévi, C., 1960. Les spongiaires à desmes astéroïdes. — Bull. Inst. océanogr. Monaco57, (1179), 1–8.
Lévi, C., 1961. Résultats scientifiques des campagnes de la “Calypso”. XIV. Campagne 1954 dans l’Océan Indien. 2. Les spongiaires de l’Île Aldabra. — Annls Inst. océanogr., Monaco39, 3–32.
Lévi, C., 1963. Spongiaires d’Africa du Sud (1) Poecilosclerides. — Trans. R. Soc. S. Africa37 (1), 1–71.
Lévi, C., 1973. Systématique de la classe des Demospongiaria (Démosponges). In: Traité de zoologie. T. 3, 1: Spongiaires: Anatomie, physiologie, systématique, écologie. Ed. by P. P. Grassé. Masson, Paris, 577–631.
Lévi, C., 1991. Lithistid sponges from the Norfolk Rise. Recent and Mesozoic genera. In: Fossil and Recent sponges. Ed. by J. Reitner & H. Keupp. Springer, New York, 72–82.
Maldonado, M. & Benito, J., 1991.Crambe tuberosa n. sp. (Demospongiae, Poecilosclerida): a new Mediterranean poecilosclerid with lithistid affinities. — Cah. Biol. mar.32, 323–332.
Maldonado, M., 1993. Demosponjas litorales de Alborán. Faunística y biogeografía. Diss., Univ. Barcelona, 499 pp.
Maldonado, M. & Uriz, M. J., 1995. Biotic affinities in a transitional zone between the Atlantic and the Mediterranean: an approach based on sponges. — J. Biogeography22, 89–110.
Moret, L., 1925. Contribution à l’étude des spongiaires silicieus du Crétacé supérieur français. —Mém. Soc. géol. Fr.5, 1–303.
Pulitzer-Finali, G., 1992. A collection of marine sponges from East Africa. — Annali Mus. civ. Stor. nat. Giacomo Doria89, 247–350.
Reid, R. E. H., 1970. Tetraxons and demosponge phylogeny. — Symp. zool. Soc. London25, 63–89.
Saether, O. A., 1979. Underlying synapomorphy and anagenetic analysis. — Zool. Scr.8, 305–312.
Saether, O. A., 1983. The canalized evolutionary potential inconsistencies in phylogenetic reasoning. — Syst. Zool.32, 343–359.
Sluys, R., 1989. Rampant parallelism: an appraisal of the use of nonuniversal derived character states in phylogenetic reconstruction. — Syst. Zool.38, 350–370.
Schmidt, O., 1868. Die Spongien der Küste von Algier. Mit Nachträgen zu den Spongien des Adriatischen Meeres. Engelmann, Leipzig, 44 pp.
Schmidt, O., 1879. Report on the Sponges. I. Spongien des Meerbusen von Mexico. Fischer, Jena, 32 pp.
Soest, R. W. M. van & Stentoft, N., 1988. Barbados deep-water sponges. — Stud. Fauna Curaçao Caribb. Isl.122, 1–175.
Templado, J., Guerra, A., Bedoya, J., Moreno, D., Remón, J. M., Maldonado, M. & Ramos, M. A., 1993. Fauna circalitoral del sur de la península ibérica. Resultados de la campaña oceanográfica “Fauna I”. C.S.I.C., Madrid, 133 pp.
Topsent, E., 1892. Contribution a l’étude des spongiaires de l’Atlantique Nord. — Résult. Camp. scient. Prince Albert I2, 1–165.
Topsent, E., 1925. Etude de spongiaires du golfe de Naples. — Archs Zool. exp. gén.63, 623–725.
Topsent, E., 1928. Spongiaires de l’Atlantique et de la Méditerranée, provenant des croissières du Prince Albert I de Monaco. — Résult. Camp. scient. Prince Albert I74, 1–376.
Uriz, M. J., 1988. Deep-water sponges from the continental shelf and slope of Namibia (South-West Africa): Classes Hexactinellida and Demospongia. — Monogr. Zool. mar.3, 9–157.
Uriz, M. J. & Maldonado, M., 1995. A reconsideration of the relationship between polyaxonid and monaxonid spicules in Demospongiae (Porifera): new data from the generaCrambe andDiscorhabdella. (Porifera) — Biol. J. Linn. Soc.55, 1–15.
Uriz, M. J., Rosell, D. & Martin, D., 1992. The sponge population of the Cabrera Archipelago (Balearic Islands): characteristics, distribution and abundance of the most representative species. — Mar. Ecol.13, 101–117.
Vacelet, J. & Boury-Esnault, N., 1982. Une nouvelle éponge du genreCrambe (Demospongiae, Poecilosclerida) de Méditerranée,C. tailliezi n. sp. — Trav. scient. Parc. natn. Port-Cros8, 107–113.
Vacelet, J., Vasseur, P. & Lévi, C., 1976. Spongiaires de la pente externe des récifs coralliens de Tuléar (Sud-Ouest de Madagascar). — Mém. Mus. natn. Hist. nat. Paris (Sér. A: Zool.)99, 1–116.
Vosmaer, G. C. J., 1880. The sponges of the Leyden Museum. I. The family of the Desmacidinae. —Not. Leyden Mus. II,18, 99–154.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maldonado, M., Uriz, M.J. Skeletal morphology of two controversial Poecilosclerid genera (Porifera, Demospongiae):Discorhabdella andCrambe . Helgolander Meeresunters 50, 369–390 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02367110
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02367110