- Published:
Vergleichende Ultrastrukturuntersuchungen der Eu- und Paraspermien von 13Protodrilus-Arten (Polychaeta, Annelida) und ihre taxonomische und phylogenetische Bedeutung
Comparative ultrastructural investigation of the eu- and paraspermatozoa of 13Protodrilus species (Polychaeta, Annelida) and its taxonomical and phylogenetical implications
Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen volume 43, pages 113–156 (1989)
Abstract
The morphology of the slender, filiform spermatozoa of 13Protodrilus species of 22 different populations is investigated by light and transmission electron microscopy. All species have two types of spermatoza: fertile euspermatozoa, and paraspermatozoa, which are probably infertile and may comprise up to 20% of the total number of mature gametes. This is the first record of sperm dimorphism in polychaetes. The general construction pattern of the euspermatozoa is very complex. It shows a longish tapering acrosomal vesicle with an internal acrosomal rod, a rod-like conical nucleus, and a midpiece with numerous very complex supporting elements and two thin mitochondrial derivatives. Further, it has a ‘peribasal body’ surrounding the basal body of the axoneme, an anulus region with an ‘anchoring apparatus’ and an anulus cuff. Posteriorly, the tail region proper contains in some species 2 to 9 supporting rods. In several species the euspermatozoon shows very distinct and species-specific alternations of this ‘general pattern’ relating to e.g. size of sperm elements, structure of acrosome and nucleus, presence or absence of axial rod, and number, shape and size of supporting elements in midpiece and tail. In a number of species some sections of the euspermatozoon overlap with each other more or less strongly. The paraspermatozoon has a comparatively simple construction pattern and possesses no supporting structures in midpiece and tail region. The midpiece is very short and, in some species, entirely surrounded by its two thin and elongate mitochondrial derivatives. An axial rod is often missing or reduced; different sperm sections never overlap each other. In contrast to the euspermatozoa, the paraspermatozoa of the different species have a very similar ultrastructure. Their possible function in spermatophore transfer and histolytical opening of the female epidermis is discussed. A comparison of the different forms of euspermatozoa inProtodrilus elucidates possible plesiomorphous and apomorphous sperm traits. Very likely, the hypothetical plesiomorphous type of spermatozoa inProtodrilus has a very similar morphology to that of the paraspermatozoa, which for this reason are considered to be a sort of persisting representatives of the ancientProtodrilus sperm type. InProtodrilus, the different traits of the euspermatozoa represent excellent taxonomic characters for distinguishing species (e.g. ‘sibling species’). They can also be used well for phylogenetics within the genus, whereas the relations ofProtodrilus to other polychaete groups cannot be clarified solely on the basis of sperm characters, since in all groups the sperm structure is primarily an adaptation to a specific mode of reproduction. Generally, the value of sperm characters in phylogenetic considerations at higher taxonomic levels seems to be very limited due to the surprisingly wide range of different sperm structures within a single genus as is demonstrated in the present paper.
Zitierte Literatur
Adiyodi, K. G. & Adiyodi, R. G., 1983. Reproductive biology of invertebrates. Wiley, New York,2, 1–692.
Afzelius, B., 1959. Electron microscopy of the sperm tail. — J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol.5, 269–281.
Afzelius, B., 1969. Ultrastructure of cilia and flagella. In: Handbook of molecular cytology. Ed. by A. Lima-de-Faria. North Holland Publ. Amsterdam, 1219–1242.
Afzelius, B., 1971. The spermatozoon of the nemertineMalacobdella grossa. — J. submicrosc. Cytol.3, 181–192.
Afzelius, 1979. Sperm structure in relation to phylogeny in lower metazoa. In: The spermatozoon. Ed. by D. W. Fawcett & I. M. Bedford. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Baltimore, 243–251.
Afzelius, 1983. The spermatozoon ofMyzostomum cirriferum (Annelida, Myzostomida). — J. Ultrastruct. Res.83, 58–68.
Afzelius, 1984. Spermiogenesis inMyzostomum cirreferum (Annelida, Myzostomida). — Vidensk. Meddr dansk naturh. Foren.145, 11–21.
Aiyar, R. G. & Alikunhi, K. H., 1944. On some archiannelids of the Madras coast. — Proc. natn Inst. Sci. India10, 113–140.
Atwood, D. G., 1975. Fine structure of an elongated dorso-ventrally compressed echinoderm (Holothuroidea) spermatozoon. — J. Morph.145, 189–208.
Baccetti, B., 1970. Comparative spermatology. Acad. Press, New York, 573 pp.
Baccetti, B., 1979. The evaluation of the acrosomal complex. In: The spermatozoon. Ed. by D. W. Fawcett & J. M. Bedford. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Baltimore, 305–329.
Baccetti, B. & Afzelius, B. A., 1976. The biology of the sperm cell. Ed. by A. Wolsky. Karger, Basel, 245 pp.
Baccetti, B., Pallini, V. & Burrini, A. G., 1976. The accessory fibers of the sperm tail. — J. Ultrastruct. Res.54, 261–275.
Block, E. M. & Goodnight, L. J., 1980. Spermatogenesis inLimnodrilus hoffmeisteri (Annelida, Tubificidae): A morphological study of the development of two sperm types. — Trans. Am. microsc. Soc.99, 367–384.
Braidotti, P., Ferraguti, M. & Fleming, T. P., 1980. Cell junctions between spermatozoa flagella within the spermatozeugmata ofTubifex tubifex (Annelida: Oligochaeta). — J. Ultrastruct. Res.73, 299–309.
Braidotti, P. & Ferraguti, M., 1982. Two sperm types in the spermatozeugma ofTubifex tubifex (Annelida: Oligochaeta). — J. Morph.171, 123–136.
Buckland-Nicks, J., Williams, D., Chia, F. S. & Fontaine, A., 1982. The fine structure of the polymorphic spermatozoa ofFusitriton oregonensis (Mollusca: Gastropoda), with notes on the cytochemistry of the internal secretions. — Cell Tiss. Res.227, 235–255.
Buckland-Nicks, J., Williams, D., Chia, F. S. & Fontaine, A., 1983. Studies on the polymorphic spermatozoa of a marine snail. 2. Genesis of the eupyrene sperm. — Gamete Res.7, 19–37.
Chia, F. S., Atwood, D. & Crawford, B., 1975. Comparative morphology of echinoderm sperm and possible phylogenetic implications. — Am. Zool.15, 533–565.
Eckelbarger, K. J. & Grassle, J.-P., 1987. Spermatogenesis, sperm storage and comparative sperm morphology in nine species ofCapitella, Capitomastus andCapitellides (Polychaeta: Capitellidae). — Mar. Biol.95, 415–429.
Ermack, T. H. & Eakin, R. M., 1976. Fine structure of the cerebral and pygidial ocelli inChone ecautata (Polychaeta, Sabellidae). — J. Ultrastruct. Res.54, 243–260.
Fallon, J. F. & Austin, C. R., 1967. Fine structure of gametes ofNereis limbata (Annelida) before and after interaction. — J. exp. Zool.166, 225–242.
Fawcett, D. W., 1970. A comparative view of sperm ultrastructure. — Biol. Reprod. (Suppl.),2, 90–127.
Fawcett, D. W., 1975. The mammalian spermatozoon. — Devl Biol.44, 394–436.
Fawcett, D. W. & Phillips, D. M., 1969. The fine structure and development of the neck region of the mammalian spermatozoon. — Anat. Rec.,165, 153–184.
Fawcett, D. W. & Phillips, D. M., 1970. Recent observations on the ultrastructure and development of the mammalian spermatozoon. In: Comparative spermatology. Ed. by Baccetti. Acad. Press. New York, 13–28.
Ferraguti, M., 1983. Clitellata. In: Reproductive biology of invertebrates. Ed. by K. G. Adiyodi & R. G. Adiyodi. Wiley, London,2, 343–376.
Franzén, A., 1956. On spermiogenesis, morphology of the spermatozoon, and biology of fertilization among invertebrates. — Zool. Bidr. Uppsala31, 355–482.
Franzén, A., 1975a. Sperm ultrastructure in some polychaeta. In: The functional anatomy of spermatozoa. Ed. by B. A. Afzelius. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 267–278.
Franzén, A., 1975b. Fine structure of spermiogenesis inFabricia sabella (Ehrenberg), Polychaeta, Fam. Sabellidae. — Zoon,3, 1–10.
Franzén, A., 1977a. Sperm structure with regard to fertilization biology and phylogenetics. — Verh. dt. zool. Ges.70, 123–138.
Franzén, A., 1977b. Ultrastructure of spermatids and spermatozoa in Archiannelida. — Zoon5, 97–105.
Franzén, A., 1982. Ultrastructure of spermatids and spermatozoa in three polychaetes with modified biology of reproduction:Autolytus sp.,Chitinopoma serrula, andCapitella capitata. — Int. J. Invert. Reprod.5, 185–200.
Franzén, A. & Sensenbaugh, T., 1984. Fine structure of spermiogenesis in the ArchiannellidNerilla antennata Schmidt.-Vidensk. Meddr dansk naturh. Foren.145, 23–36.
Franzén, A. & Rice, S. A., 1988. Spermatogenesis, male gametes and gamete interactions. — Microfauna mar.4, 309–333.
Healy, J. M., 1982. Ultrastructure of spermatozoa, euspermatozoa and eusperm-like spermatozoa ofObtortio cf. fulva (Prosobranchia: Cerithiacea). — Helgoländer Meeresunters.35, 489–500.
Healy, J. M., 1986a. Ultrastructure of paraspermatozoa of cerithacean gastropods (Prosobranchia: Mesogastropoda). — Helgoländer Meeresunters.40, 177–199.
Healy, J. M. 1986b. Euspermatozoa and paraspermatozoa of the relict cerithacean gastropodCampanile symbolium (Phaeophyceae, Ectocarpales). — Helgoländer Meeresunters.40, 201–218.
Healy, J. M. & Jamieson, B. G. M., 1981. An ultrastructural examination of developing and mature paraspermatozoa inPyrazus ebenius (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Potamididae). — Zoomorphology98, 101–119.
Hodgson, A. N. & Bernard, R. T. F., 1986. Observations on the ultrastructure of the spermatozoon of two mytilids from the south-west coast of England. — J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K.66, 385–390.
Jamieson, B. G. M., 1981. The ultrastructure of the Oligochaeta. Acad. Press, London, 462 pp.
Jamieson, B. G. M., 1983a. Spermatozoal ultrastructure: evolution and congruence with a holomorphological phylogeny of the Oligochaeta (Annelida). — Zool. Scr.12, 107–114.
Jamieson, B. G. M., 1983b. Spermiogenesis in the oligochaetoid polychaeteQuesta (Annelida, Questidae). —Zool. Scr. 12, 179–186.
Jamieson, B. G. M., 1983c. The ultrastructure of the spermatozoon, of the oligochaetoid polychaeteQuesta sp. (Questidae, Annelida) and its phylogenetic significance. — J. Ultrastruct. Res.84, 238–251.
Jamieson, B. G. M., 1984. A phenetic an cladistic study of spermatozoal ultrastructure in the Oligochaeta (Annelida). — Hydrobiologia115, 3–13.
Jamieson, B. G. M., 1988. Oligochaete ultrastructure: some comparisons with the Polychaeta. — Microfauna mar.4, 397–428.
Jamieson, B. G. M., Afzelius, B. A. & Franzén, A., 1985. Ultrastructure of the acentriolar, aflagellate spermatozoa and the eggs ofHistriobdella homari andStratiodrilus novaehollandiae (Histriobdelledae, Polychaeta). — J. submicrosc. Cytol.17, 363–380.
Jamieson, B. G. M., Erséus, C. & Ferraguti, M., 1987. Parsimony analysis of the phylogeny of some Oligochaeta (Annelida) using spermatozoal ultrastructure. — Cladistics3, 145–155.
Jouin, C., 1978–1979. Spermatozoide non flagellé et fécondation externe chezProtodriloides symbioticus (Giard) (Annélides, Polychaetes, Archiannélides). — Vie Milieu (Ser. AB)28–29, 473–487.
Kristensen, R. M. & Niilonen, T., 1982. Structural studies onDiurodrilus Remane (Diurodrilidae fam. n.), with description ofDiurodrilus westheidei sp. n. from the arctic interstitial meiobenthos, W. Greenland. — Zool. Scr.11, 1–12.
Nordheim, H. von, 1984. Life histories of subtidal interstitial polychaetes of the families Polygordiidae, Protodrilidae, Nerillidae, Dinophilidae and Diurodrilidae from Helgoland (North Sea) — Helgoländer Meeresunters.38, 1–20.
Nordheim, H. von, 1987. Anatomie, Ultrastruktur und Systematik der GattungProtodrilus (Annelida, Polychaeta). Diss., Univ. Osnabrück, 299 pp.
Nordheim, H. von, 1989. Six new species ofProtodrilus (Polychaeta, Annelida) from Europe and New Zealand together with a concise presentation of the genus. — Zool. Scr.18, (in press).
Olive, P. J. W., 1983. Annelida-Polychaeta. In: Reproductive biology of invertebrates. Ed. by K. G. Adiyodi & R. G. Adiyodi. Wiley, Chichester,2, 321–342.
Pfannenstiel, H.-D., Grünig, L. & Lücht, J., 1987. Gametogenesis and reproduction in nereid sibling species (Platynereis dumerilii, P. massiliensis). — Bull. biol. Soc. Wash.7, 272–279.
Pierantoni, U., 1908.Protodrilus. — Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel31, 1–226.
Popham, J. D., 1974. Comparative morphometrics of the acrosomes of the sperm of “externally” and “internally” fertilizing sperms of the shipworms (Teredinidae, Bivalvia, Mollusca). — Cell. Tiss. Res.,150, 291–297.
Rice, S. A., 1981. Spermatogenesis and sperm ultrastructure in three species ofPolydora andStreblospio benedicti (Polychaeta: Spionidae). — Zoomorphology97, 1–16.
Roosen-Runge, E. C., 1977. The process of spermatogenesis in animals. Cambridge Univ. Press, London, 214 pp.
Sato, M. & Osanai, K., 1986. Morphological identification of sperm receptors above egg microvilli in the polychaeteNeanthes japonica. — Devl Biol.113, 263–270.
Scharnofske, P., 1984. Anatomie, Ultrastruktur und Funktion der männlichen Geschlechtsorgane der Dinophilidae und Histriobdellidae (Annelida, Polychaeta). Diss., Univ. Göttingen, 171 pp.
Scharnofske, P., 1986. Ultrastructure of sperm morphology ofTrilobodrilus axi andT. heideri (Dinophilidae, Polychaeta). — Helgoländer Meeresunters.40, 419–430.
Tilney, L. G., 1975. Actin filaments in the acrosomal reaction ofLimulus sperm. Motions generated by alternations in the packing of the filaments. — J. Cell. Biol.64, 289–310.
Tilney, L. G., Clain, J. & Tilney, M. S., 1979. Membrane events in the acrosomal reaction ofLimulus sperm (membrane fusion, filament-membrane particle attachment, and the source and formation of new membrane surface). — J. Cell. Biol.81, 229–253.
Westheide, W., 1984a. Genesis and structure of the modified spermatozoon in the interstitial polychaeteHesionides arenaria. — Biol. Cell50, 53–66.
Westheide, W., 1984b. The concept of reproduction in polychaetes with small body size: adaptations in interstitial species. — Fortschr. Zool.29, 265–287.
Westheide, W., 1985. The systematic position of the Dinophilidae and the archiannelid problem. In: The origin and relationships of lower invertebrates. Ed. by S. Conway-Morris J. D. George, R. Gibson & H. M. Platt. Univ. Press, Oxford, 310–326.
Westheide, W. & Rieger, R., 1987. Systematics of the amphiatlanticMicrophthalmus-listensis-species-group (Polychaeta: Hesionidae): facts and concepts for reconstruction of phylogeny and speciation. — Z. zool. Syst. Evolutionsforsch.25, 12–39.
Wirth, U., 1984. Die Struktur der Metazoen-Spermien und ihre Bedeutung für die Phylogenetik. — Verh. naturwiss. Ver. Hamburg (N. F.)27, 295–362.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
von Nordheim, H. Vergleichende Ultrastrukturuntersuchungen der Eu- und Paraspermien von 13Protodrilus-Arten (Polychaeta, Annelida) und ihre taxonomische und phylogenetische Bedeutung. Helgolander Meeresunters 43, 113–156 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02367895
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02367895