- Environmental Evaluation
- Published:
Methods for ecological monitoring: Biological interactions in a rocky subtidal community
Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen volume 33, pages 473–483 (1980)
Abstract
Whilst both abiotic and biotic factors affect communities, biological interactions are widely believed to be the most important factors structuring subtidal communities. Among the potential biological interactions a few “key ” species may regulate species fluctuations. A rocky subtidal community in the Oslofjord (Norway) has been investigated using stereophotography, field experiments and manipulations (settlement plates, scraping, cages). The purpose was to develop a method for biological monitoring of chronic pollution effects. Around 60 species were identified in the community. The most permanent occupants wereLithothamnion sp. (25–30% cover) andPomatoceros triqueter (ca. 20% cover). The most important fluctuation was induced by the rapid growth of the hydroidLaomedea longissima to a 100% cover in June and its rapid disappearance. Free space covered more than 30% except in the period with large hydroid occurrence. The most active settlement period was in summer and autumn. The most important predators observed wereCoryphella sp.,Asterias rubens andPasmmechinus miliaris.Coryphella grazed upon the hydroids andAsterias andPsammechinus foraged on settled organisms which resulted in an increase of free space. Predation and recruitment in that order are probably the two most important factors structuring the studied community. The “key ” species were therefore the three predators. A monitoring programme should concentrate on these predators and their influence on the success of recruitment and the abundance of hydroids and free space, since these species control the natural fluctuations in the studied community. The stereophotographic method combined with simple settlement-plate experiments seems suitable for such a monitoring programme.
Literature cited
Anger, K., 1978. Development of a subtidal epifaunal community at the island of Helgoland. — Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters.31, 457–470.
Dayton, P. K., 1971. Competition, disturbance, and community organisation: The provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community. — Ecol. Monogr.41, 351–389.
Dayton, P. K., 1972. Toward an understanding of community resilience and the potential effects of enrichment to the benthos at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Proceedings of the colloquium on conservation problems in Antarctica. Ed. by B. C. Parker. Allen Press, Lawrence, Ks, 81–95.
Karlson, R., 1978. Predation and space utilization patterns in a marine epifaunal community. — J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol.31, 225–239.
Kvalvågnæs, K., Green, N. & Rørslett, B., 1976. Stereofotografering. Et hjelpemiddel i akvatisk biologi. Norsk Institutt for Vannforskning, NIVA, Oslo, 89–95.
Lawrence, J. M., 1975. On the relationships between marine plants and sea urchins. — Oceanogr. mar. Biol.13, 213–286.
Lewis, J. R., 1964. The ecology of rocky shores. Engl. Univ. Press, London, 323 pp.
Lewis, J. R., 1976. Long-term ecological surveillance: Practical relaties in the rocky littoral. — Oceanogr. mar. Biol.14, 371–390.
Løyning, P., 1922. Nudibranchfaunaen i Drøbaksundet. — Skr. norske VidenskAkad. (Mat.-nat. Kl.)6, 1–103.
Lundälv, T., 1971. Quantitative studies on rocky-bottom biocoenoses by underwater photogrammetry: A methodical study. — Thalassia jugosl.7, 201–208.
Menge, B. A., 1976. Organization of the New England rocky intertidal community: Role of predation, competition, and environmental heterogeneity. — Ecol. Monogr.46, 355–393.
Paine, R. T., 1966. Food web complexity and species diversity. — Am. Nat.100, 65–75.
Paine, R. T., 1969. ThePisaster-Tegula interaction: Prey patches, predator food preference, and intertidal community structure. — Ecology50, 950–961.
Paine, R. T., 1976. Size-limited predation: An observational and experimental approach with theMytilus-Pisaster interaction. — Ecology57, 858–873.
Peterson, C. H., 1979. The importance of predation and competition in organizing the intertidal epifaunal communities of Barnegat Inlet, New Jersey. — Oecologia39, 1–24.
Sutherland, J. P. & Karlson, R. H., 1977. Development and stability of the fouling community at Beaufort, North Carolina. — Ecol. Monogr.47, 425–446.
Thompson, T. E. & Brown, G. H., 1976. British opistobranch molluscs. Acad. Press, London, 203 pp. (Synopses of the British fauna. Nr. 8)
Torlegård, A. K. I. & Lundälv, T. L., 1974. Underwater analytical system. — Photogramm. Engng40, 287–293.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Christie, H. Methods for ecological monitoring: Biological interactions in a rocky subtidal community. Helgolander Meeresunters 33, 473–483 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02414772
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02414772