Skip to main content
  • Published:

Ultrastructure of the spermatozoa ofCorystes cassivelaunus (Corystidae),Platepistoma nanum (Cancridae) andCancer pagurus (Cancridae) supports recognition of the Corystoidea (Crustacea, Brachyura, Heterotremata)

Abstract

A combination of characters, not individually unique, possessed by the corystid,Corystes cassivelaunus, and the two cancrids,Platepistoma nanum andCancer pagurus, defines a corystoid-type of spermatozoon: the basally bulbous, anteriorly narrowing perforatorium, the extent of this almost to the plasma membrane through a widely perforate operculum, and the simple inner acrosome zone, lacking an acrosome ray zone. The sperm of the two cancrids are closely similar, that of the corystid differing, for instance, in the less pointed, and less tapered, form of the perforatorium. This relative uniformity of spermatozoal ultrastructure in the cancrid+corystid assemblage so far investigated supports inclusion of the two families in the superfamily Corystoidea by Guinot (1978). The combination of perforation of the operculum and absence of an acrosome ray zone (at least in a clearly recognizable form) are features of the Potamidae which possibly indicate that the latter family, modified for a freshwater existence, is related to the cancrid+corystid assemblage. Some elongation of the centrioles, apparent at least inCorystes, may be a further link with potamids in which they are greatly elongated. The coenospermial spermatophores of cancridoids are a notable difference from the cleistospermia of potamids; but the latter is probably an apomorphic modification for fertilization biology.

Literature Cited

  • Daddow, L., 1986. An abbreviated method of the double lead stain technique.—J. submicrosc. Cytol.18, 221–224.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davie, P., 1991. Crustacea Decapoda: the genusPlatepistoma Rathbun, 1906 (Cancridae) with the description of three new species.—Mém. Mus. natn. Hist. nat., Paris (Sér. A: Zool.)152, 493–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinot, D., 1978. Principes d'une classification évolutive des Crustacés Décapodes Brachyoures.— Bull. biol. Fr. Belg.112, 211–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinot, D., Jamieson, B. G. M. & Tudge, C. C., 1997. Spermatozoal ultrastructure and relationships of the freshwater crabsPotamon fluviatile andPotamon ibericum (Crustacea, Brachyura, Potamidae). —J. Zool., Lond.241(2) (in press).

  • Jamieson, B. G. M., 1989. The ultrastructure of the spermatozoa of four species of xanthid crabs (Crustacea, Brachyura, Xanthidae).—J. submicrosc. Cytol. Pathol.21, 579–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, B. G. M., 1991a. Sperm and phylogeny in the Brachyura (Crustacea). In: Comparative spermatology 20 years after. Ed. by B. Baccetti. Raven Press, New York, 967–972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, B. G. M., 1991b. Ultrastructure and phylogeny of crustacean spermatozoa.—Mem. Qld. Mus.31, 109–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, B. G. M., 1993. Ultrastructure of the spermatozoon ofPotamonautes perlatus sidneyi (Heterotremata, Brachyura, Crustacea).—S. Afr. J. Zool.28, 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, B. G. M., 1994. Phylogeny of the Brachyura with particular reference to the Podotremata: evidence from a review of spermatozoal ultrastructure.—Phil. Trans. R. Soc. (B)345, 373–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, B. G. M., Guinot, D. & Richer de Forges, B., 1995. Phylogeny of the Brachyura (Crustacea, Decapoda): evidence from spermatozoal ultrastructure.—Mém. Mus. natn. Hist. nat., Paris (Sér A: Zool.)166, 265–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langreth, S. G., 1965. Ultrastructural observations on the sperm of the crabCancer borealis.—J. Cell Biol.27, 56A-57A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langreth, S. G., 1969. Spermiogenesis inCancer crabs.—J. Cell Biol.43, 575–603.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pochon-Masson, J., 1968. L'ultrastructure des spermatozoïdes vésiculaires chez les crustacés décapodes avant et au cours de leur dévagination expérimentale. I. Brachyoures et Anomoures.— Annls Sci. nat. (Sér. Zool.)10, 1–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurr, A. R., 1969. A low viscosity epoxy-resin embedding medium for electron microscopy.—J. Ultrastruct. Res.26, 31–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Takeda, 1977. Two interesting crabs from Hawaii.—Pacif. Sci.31, 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tudge, C. C. & Justine, J.-L., 1994. The cytoskeletal proteins actin and tubulin in the spermatozoa of four decapod crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda).—Acta zool., Stockh.75, 277–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tudge, C. C., Grellier, P. & Justine, J.-L., 1994. Actin in the acrosome of the spermatozoa of the crab,Cancer pagurus L. (Decapoda, Crustacea).—Mol. Reprod. Dev.38, 178–186.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, G. F., 1977. The biology of crabs. Elek Science, London, 202 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jamieson, B.G.M., Guinot, D., Tudge, C.C. et al. Ultrastructure of the spermatozoa ofCorystes cassivelaunus (Corystidae),Platepistoma nanum (Cancridae) andCancer pagurus (Cancridae) supports recognition of the Corystoidea (Crustacea, Brachyura, Heterotremata). Helgoländer Meeresunters. 51, 83–93 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908756

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908756

Keywords