Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of characters of Lithothamnion muelleri and L. glaciale from Espiríto Santo state (Brazil) and with the same and related species from other areas

From: New records of rhodolith-forming species (Corallinales, Rhodophyta) from deep water in Espírito Santo State, Brazil

 

Lithothamnion muelleri

Lithothamnion corallioides

Lithothamnion glaciale

Brazila

Southern Australiab

British Islesc

Ria de Vigod

Ría de Arousae

British Islesf

British Islesc

Brazila

Branch diameter

1–3 mm

1–4 mm

Mainly <1 mm

ND

<1.5–1.7 mm

>1 mm

Variable

2–4 mm

Core cells (l) × (d) μm

(7–18) × (3–9)

(2–30) × (2–15)

Fusiform (5–35) × (5–10)

ND

Fusiform (5–10) × (5–10)

ND (8.5–12) × (4–8)

Elliptical (8–12) × (4–8)

Elliptical (10–20) × (7–11)

Core fusions

Localized

ND

Very extensive

Very extensive

Very extensive

ND

Localized

Localized

Groups of fused cells

Bead-like

ND

Star-like

ND

ND

ND

Bead-like

Bead-like

Peripheral cells (l) × (d) μm

(12–17) × (5–7)

ND

(10–30) × (5–12)

ND

ND

(7.5–26) × (15–50)

(7–26) × (3–8)

(12–21) × (7–13)

Tetra/bisporangia conceptacle shape

Slightly raised above

Protruding above or flush

Without rim, pore plate convex

Protruding above

ND

Slightly raised

With narrow, non-raised rim, pore plate level

Buried, non-raised rim, pore plate level

Diam. of tetra/bisporangial conceptacle chamber (μm)

375–755

280–780

234–380

200–400

ND

150–360

150–360

300–430

Height of tetra/bisporangial conceptacle chamber

200–320

150–200

83–117

108

ND

110–180

110–180

160–280

Roof thickness (no. of cells/length) (μm)

7–9/66–80

5–9

ND/29–39

ND/27–31

ND

ND/5–40

ND/5–40

3–4/25–35

No. of layers surrounding conceptacles below thallus surface

7–9

5–9

10g

9–11h

ND

ND

12–14i

13–14

Tetra/bisporangial shape

Long

Long

Long and thin

ND

Long

ND

Elliptical

Elliptical

  1. ND no data
  2. aPresent study
  3. bWoelkerling (1996)
  4. cChamberlain and Irvine (1994)
  5. dAdey and McKibbin (1970)
  6. ePeña and Bárbara (2004)
  7. fAdey and Adey (1973)
  8. gData taken from Chamberlain and Irvine (1994), figure 85A
  9. hData taken from Adey and McKibbin (1970), figure 5
  10. iData taken from Chamberlain and Irvine (1994), figure 87B