Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of applying multinomial logistic regression to three sample applications and three groups of environmental predictor variables

From: Prediction of benthic community structure from environmental variables in a soft-sediment tidal basin (North Sea)

Group of predictors

H hydrodynamics

S sediment

H + S hydro + sedim.

Application A1: spatial interpolation

 Best predicting set of covariates, based only on training set

Dry, τ meanc , (τ maxw )2

logD10

Dry, τ meanc , (τ maxw )2, logD10

 CCR for training set

0.63 ± 0.030

0.50 ± 0.049

0.68 ± 0.031

 CCR for test set

0.61 ± 0.031

0.49 ± 0.058

0.64 ± 0.031

 Cohen’s kappa for training set

0.47 ± 0.043

0.26 ± 0.079

0.54 ± 0.046

 Cohen’s kappa for test set, κTEST

0.44 ± 0.044

0.25 ± 0.077

0.49 ± 0.044

Application A2: extrapolation to a spatial gap in the benthos data

 Best predicting set of covariates, based only on training set

Dry, τ meanc , (τ maxw )2

logD10, logD50

Dry, τ meanc , (τ maxw )2, logD50, (logD50)2

 CCR for training set

0.65 ± 0.018

0.53 ± 0.028

0.71 ± 0.017

 CCR for test set

0.58 ± 0.034

0.42 ± 0.051

0.62 ± 0.054

 Cohen’s kappa for training set

0.50 ± 0.026

0.29 ± 0.043

0.58 ± 0.025

 Cohen’s kappa for test set, κTEST

0.40 ± 0.051

0.14 ± 0.077

0.44 ± 0.077

Application A3: extrapolation to a new drainage area

 Best predicting set of covariates, based only on training set

Dry, τ meanc

logD10, logD50, logD90

Dry, dry2,

 τ meanc , logD50

 CCR for training set

0.67 ± 0.032

0.62 ± 0.028

0.73 ± 0.021

 CCR for test set

0.53 ± 0.041

0.51 ± 0.043

0.51 ± 0.038

 Cohen’s kappa for training set

0.52 ± 0.047

0.42 ± 0.049

0.61 ± 0.030

 Cohen’s kappa for test set, κTEST

0.34 ± 0.048

0.25 ± 0.053

0.26 ± 0.045

  1. The results of application A1 are averages and standard deviations of 200 different (random) subdivisions of the full dataset. The standard deviations of applications A2 and A3 were calculated from 200 bootstrap replications of the training set. CCR is the “correct classification rate”