Effects of habitat structure on the epifaunal community in Mussismilia corals: does coral morphology influence the richness and abundance of associated crustacean fauna?

Table 1 Results of canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) for Decapoda and redundancy analysis (RDA) for Copepoda, Peracarida and Ostracoda

Decapoda
Axes	1	2	3	4	Total inertia
Eigenvalues	0.452	0.355	0.171	0.076	4.099
Species–environment correlations	0.805	0.773	0.667	0.480
Cumulative percentage variance
of species data	11.0	19.7	23.9	25.7
of species–environment relation	42.4	75.6	91.6	98.8
Sum of all eigenvalues					4.099
Sum of all canonical eigenvalues					1.068
Copepoda
Axes	1	2	3	4	Total variance
Eigenvalues	0.247	0.050	0.012	0.006	1.000
Species–environment correlations	0.802	0.637	0.555	0.385
Cumulative percentage variance
of species data	24.7	29.7	30.8	31.4
of species–environment relation	77.8	93.5	97.2	99.1
Sum of all eigenvalues					1.000
Sum of all canonical eigenvalues					0.317
Peracarida
Axes	1	2	3	4	Total variance
Eigenvalues	0.123	0.052	0.018	0.007	1.000
Species–environment correlations	0.778	0.679	0.647	0.369
Cumulative percentage variance
of species data	12.3	17.4	19.2	19.9
of species–environment relation	60.6	86.2	94.9	98.5
Sum of all eigenvalues					1.000
Sum of all canonical eigenvalues					0.202
Ostracoda
Axes	1	2	3	4	Total variance
Eigenvalues	0.108	0.053	0.020	0.012	1.000
Species–environment correlations	0.756	0.604	0.506	0.430
Cumulative percentage variance
of species data	10.8	16.0	18.1	19.3
of species–environment relation	53.3	79.4	89.5	95.6
Sum of all eigenvalues					1.000
Sum of all canonical eigenvalues					0.202

ISSN: 1438-3888