Skip to main content

Table 2 Dynamics of average shell length (L ± SE, mm) of the 1988 (sites 1, 2) and 1999 (sites 3, 4) generations of Mya arenaria

From: Growth of Mya arenaria L. at the northern edge of the range: heterogeneity of soft-shell clam growth characteristics in the White Sea

Age (years)

L ± SE

Location namea

MT_1

LT_1

MT_2

LT_2

MT_3

MT_4

1

8.2 ± 0.1

9.2 ± 0.1

5.4 ± 0.1

7.1 ± 0.1

4.2 ± 0.1

7.4 ± 0.3

2

12.0 ± 0.1

13.9 ± 0.2

9.1 ± 0.2

9.9 ± 0.2

8.1 ± 0.2

11.1 ± 0.3

3

15.8 ± 0.3

17.0 ± 0.1

14.1 ± 0.2

14.4 ± 0.2

12.2 ± 0.2

14.3 ± 0.3

4

–

22.1 ± 0.2

19.4 ± 0.3

19.1 ± 0.2

15.9 ± 0.3

25.7 ± 0.5

5

24.3 ± 0.4

25.0 ± 0.2

20.3 ± 0.4

19.5 ± 0.3

17.5 ± 0.2

35.7 ± 0.5

6

–

29.4 ± 0.3

–

–

–

–

7

30.1 ± 0.7

31.9 ± 0.4

24.0 ± 0.5

30.0 ± 0.5

25.5 ± 1.4

35.8 ± 0.9

8

34.1 ± 0.6

36.9 ± 0.8

25.9 ± 0.4

28.7 ± 0.7

–

–

9

34.5 ± 0.5

38.1 ± 0.3

30.1 ± 2.1

31.7 ± 1.6

–

–

10

39.5 ± 1.0

41.7 ± 0.4

–

–

–

–

11

43.0 ± 0.4

43.0 ± 0.4

–

–

–

–

12

47.1 ± 1.2

45.1 ± 0.4

–

–

–

–

13

46.2 ± 1.1

50.1 ± 0.6

–

–

–

–

14

48.5 ± 0.8

50.3 ± 0.5

–

–

–

–

15

52.8 ± 1.3

50.9 ± 0.5

–

–

–

–

16

50.3 ± 1.5

50.2 ± 0.8

–

–

–

–

17

–

–

–

–

–

–

18

62.6 ± 1.6

56.4 ± 1.0

–

–

–

–

19

57.6 ± 2.2

53.6 ± 1.3

–

–

–

–

20

57.3 ± 1.8

57.4 ± 1.3

–

–

–

–

21

–

–

–

–

–

–

22

–

59.0 ± 1.1

–

–

–

–

23

62.1 ± 3.2

58.6 ± 1.1

–

–

–

–

24

–

60.6 ± 1.8

–

–

–

–

25

–

59.2 ± 1.3

–

–

–

–

L ∞

82.02

67.16

37.50

59.80

128.10

68.17

k

0.06

0.09

0.16

0.08

0.03

0.12

t 0

–0.50

–0.43

0.07

–0.40

–0.14

0.35

L max (age, years)

71 (20)

70 (20)

46 (9)

37 (8)

38 (7)

50 (7)

  1. aLocation name is as follows: MT_1 middle tidal zone at site 1, LT_1 low tidal zone at site 1, MT_2 means middle tidal zone at site 2, etc., dash no data, L ∞ , k, and t 0 constants of the Bertalanffy equation, L max maximum observed size, mm, SE standard error