Open Access

Brooding in Psolus patagonicus (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea) from Argentina, SW Atlantic Ocean

Helgoland Marine Research200964:161

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10152-009-0161-z

Received: 11 August 2008

Accepted: 28 April 2009

Published: 15 May 2009

Abstract

The mode, season, and time of brooding, egg diameter, egg number per brood, and the characteristics of newly released juveniles of Psolus patagonicus were investigated off Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina, between October 1999 and February 2001. Individuals were attached to the Patagonian scallop, Zygochlamys patagonica. Spawning occurs between February and March. The mean egg diameter, 887 ± 26 μm, is the highest reported for the family Psolidae. Eggs are brooded under the mother’s sole until they develop into crawling juveniles within 7 months. The largest embryos reached a length of 1,941 ± 228 μm in September. During the brooding period (February–September) the number of brooded embryos decreased while their size increased. Our study confirms brooding behaviour in female P. patagonicus.

Keywords

Psolus patagonicus BroodingPsolidaeArgentine continental shelf

Introduction

The sea cucumber Psolus patagonicus is abundant in the southwestern Atlantic Ocean. It has been reported from different substrata in a variety of habitats from southern Patagonia, including intertidal rocky shores and fronds and holdfasts of Macrocystis pyrifera (Bernasconi 1941; Hernández 1981). Moreover, it is found as epizoic on the shells of live scallops of economic importance (Zygochlamys patagonica) on the continental shelf off Buenos Aires province, Argentina (Bremec and Lasta 2002). Like many other benthic invertebrates in the region, P. patagonicus is distributed in shallow waters at high latitudes (Patagonian and subantarctic area), and in deeper, colder waters at low latitudes (off the Rio de la Plata estuary).

Brooding behaviour in holothurians has been observed in at least 41 species (Smiley et al. 1991). McEuen and Chia (1991) provided information on the reproductive pattern of 15 species of the family Psolidae. Eleven of these are brooding species and the remaining three have pelagic larvae.

Species belonging to family Psolidae exhibit a great diversity of brooding modes. Broods occur internally in the coelom, in dorsal depressions, folds of the sole, chambers underneath dorsal plates, interradial pouches, interradial pouches surrounding the tentacular crown, and under the sole (McEuen and Chia 1991). Juveniles of sessile species develop successfully in micro-habitats suitable for brooders (Gutt 1991).

Bernasconi (1941) reported P. patagonicus is a brooding species because she found a preserved adult and two juveniles together in the same flask. Brooding by P. patagonicus subsequently has been mentioned in the literature (Hernández 1981; McEuen and Chia 1991), but its characteristics have not been described. The present study confirms P. patagonicus as a brooding species and provides information on the mode, season, and time of brooding, egg diameter, egg number per brood, and the characteristics of newly released juveniles.

Methods

Samples were collected off Mar del Plata (39°24′78″S and 55°56′70″W; Fig. 1), during 14 research cruises aboard the FRV Capitán Cánepa of the Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero (INIDEP) between October 1999 and February 2001. Specimens of the scallop Z. patagonica were collected by bottom trawling using a research dredge (2.5 m mouth opening, 10 mm mesh size at the cod end), at depths between 100 and 110 m. The bottom water temperature was measured with a CTD SBE 911. Immediately after collection, scallops with epizoic P. patagonicus (Fig. 2) were preserved in 5% formalin-seawater solution for 24 h, and then stored in 70% ethanol.
Fig. 1

Reclutas bed (39°S–55°W), sampling area of the scallop Zygochlamys patagonicus

Fig. 2

Psolus patagonicus epizoic on the Patagonian scallop Zygochlamys patagonica. Two individuals of P. patagonicus (Pp) and some Z. patagonica juveniles (Zpj) are attached to a live scallop

In the laboratory, P. patagonicus were removed from the scallops and measured with callipers. Nine hundred and-fourteen individuals were collected. Fifty-seven were brooding young under the sole.

Ten eggs and ten embryos from each brood were randomly selected each month to measure egg diameter and embryo length. The eggs and embryos in the broods were counted and photographed using a Zeiss Stemi 2000 C stereomicroscope. To avoid undercounting, the brooding specimens were carefully removed from the substratum, taking care not to leave any egg or embryo behind.

The gonad of P. patagonicus consists of numerous tubules joined together at their base forming a tuft attached to the dorsal mesentery. Sexes were identified by histological observations of the gonads. These were dissected, fixed in 5% seawater formalin for 24 h, stored in 70% ethanol, dehydrated in a graded alcohol series, embedded in paraffin, stained with haematoxylin–eosin (H/E) and examined under light microscope.

Results

Psolus patagonicus had a single spawning season from February to March (Fig. 3a). The bottom temperature ranged between 6 and 7°C. An increase in temperature values was observed from April to June. Eggs and embryos were found under the female’s sole (Fig. 3b). Histological sections of male and female gonads (Fig. 4a, b) confirmed that all brooding individuals were females.
Fig. 3

Psolus patagonicus.a Dorsal view: mouth (M) and anus (A). b Ventral view: embryos under the sole

Fig. 4

Psolus patagonicus. a Light micrographs of histological sections of ovaries; note the presence of oocytes (Oc). b Light micrographs of histological sections of testes, with different stages of spermatogenesis, including some spermatozoa (Spz)

Figure 5 shows the size-frequency distribution of the population of P. patagonicus. Body length ranged from 2.2 ± 0.1 mm for October 1999 and 2000 to 23.1 mm for November 2000. Brooding females were between 17 and 23 mm in length. The following brood development stages were recognised: stage 1 unsegmented egg (Fig. 6a) in February and March 2000; stage 2 segmented egg (Fig. 6b) in May 2000; stage 3 doliolaria larva (Fig. 6c) in June 2000; stage 4 pentactula larva (Fig. 6d) in July 2000; stage 5 juvenile (with clearly visible ossicles and tube feet (Fig. 6e) in August 2000; and stage 6 late brooded juvenile (Fig. 6f) in September 2000.
Fig. 5

Size frequency histogram (%) of Psolus patagonicus removed from scallop shells

Fig. 6

Developmental stages of Psolus patagonicus during the brooding period. a Unsegmented egg, b segmented egg, c doliolaria larvae, d pentactula larvae, e young juveniles, f late juveniles

The brooding period lasts 7 months, from February to September (Fig. 7). Developmental stages were synchronous within and among females. Eggs were spherical in shape in February–March (at the beginning of the brooding season) and underwent cleavage at the beginning of May. The doliolaria larva was observed in June, the pentactula larva in July, early juveniles in August and late juveniles in September. The initial number of 135 ± embryos in February decreased to 70 ± embryos in September, at the end of the brooding period (Fig. 7). The free-living juveniles, found attached to the scallops in October, had a mean length of 2.2 ± 0.1 mm (Fig. 5).
Fig. 7

Number and size of offspring during the brooding period. Grey bar number of embryos/eggs per brooding female. Black line size of the embryos/eggs. N number of brooding females

Discussion

Comparison of brooding patterns between psolids

McEuen and Chia (1991) reported brooding and pelagic lecithotrophic larvae as the only modes of development in the family Psolidae. The authors described four brooding sites: on the ventral side (6 species), on the dorsum (2 species), surrounding the tentacular crown (2 species), and internally (1 species).

After spawning, the diameter of the unsegmented egg of P. patagonicus (887 μm) is larger than those of other psolid species (between 330 and 650 μm) (McEuen and Chia 1991). Among psolids, Psolus antarcticus most closely resembles P. patagonicus in terms of mode of brooding (Ludwig 1897, 1898). In both species, the young are brooded under the sole of the female until the formation of the coat of ossicles and the flat sole. No data are available on the uncleaved egg diameter or the mode of development for P. antarcticus, but large eggs and the occurrence of the doliolaria stage are common features in holothurians (McEuen and Chia 1991).

Reproductive timing and environmental conditions

There is a spatio-temporal overlap between the late brooding season of P. patagonicus (October, beginning of spring) and one of the two spawning seasons of Z. patagonica. The first spawning season is from late summer to early autumn and the second during spring (September–December) (Waloszek and Waloszek 1986). In the study area, the austral spring bloom of phytoplankton (September–October) in the upper layer of the water column is followed by the phytoplankton sinking after the development of the seasonal thermocline (October–November). This process ultimately increases food availability for benthic organisms (Schejter et al. 2002).

Psoluspatagonicus, like other deep benthic animals, is subjected to small temperature fluctuations (<1°C) and complete darkness. Under this environmental condition, the sea cucumber, which is a suspension feeder, feeds on dead, dying, or decaying phytoplankton from the photic zone (Schejter et al. 2002). On this basis, it is reasonable to assume its reproductive cycle and brooding period are related to the seasonal abundance of phytoplankton. Environmental factors such as food availability synchronize reproductive events (Himmelman 1975; Tyler 1988; Gage and Tyler 1991; Smiley et al. 1991; Himmelman et al. 2008).

Implications for brooding

Psoluspatagonicus is a small sea cucumber, up to 23 mm in length. A positive relationship between small body size and brooding has been reported for marine invertebrates in general and echinoderms in particular (Chia 1974; Emson and Wilkie 1980; Strathmann and Strathmann 1982; Jablonski and Lutz 1983; Mladenov and Burke 1994; Lawrence and Herrera 2000).

It has been suggested that the small body size of brooding and fissiparous ophiuroids reflects evolutionary adaptation to patchy microhabitats (Hendler and Littman 1986; Hendler and Peck 1988). In psolids, however, the relationship between body size and type of development is not so clear. For example, a pelagic larva is part of the life cycle of large broadcast spawning species such as P. chitonoides (75 mm in length; Young and Chia 1982), P. fabricii (100 mm in length), and P. phantapus (150 mm in length) (Deichmann 1930), but also of the small Psolidium bullatum (26 mm in length) (McEuen and Chia 1991). In P. patagonicus the number of brooded embryos decreased at the same time as their size started to increase. This suggests space under the sole of brooding females becomes limited. More species need to be investigated to confirm this. Moreover, the fact that P. antarcticus (55 mm in length) (Ludwig 1897) shares similar reproductive features with the smaller P. patagonicus suggests the importance of studying the phylogenetic relationships among psolid species.

The number of juveniles in broods at the end of the brooding period was much higher than that of free-living juveniles. This may result from different reasons, e.g. increased survival of broods by mother’s protection or inability of free-living juveniles to remain attached to the scallops during bottom trawling. One advantage of brooding is protection of the offspring from predation. But a disadvantage is that it decreases long-distance dispersal which might increase the risk of local extinctions.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Mario Lasta for having invited us to participate in the Patagonian scallop campaigns, to Angel Marecos for his collaboration in some campaigns, and to the crew of the FRV “Capitán Canepa” from INIDEP (Mar del Plata, Argentina) for field support. UBACyT X 171 and PIP 112-200801-02788.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Depto. de Biodiversidad y Biología Experimental, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria
(2)
CONICET, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales

References

  1. Bernasconi I (1941) Los equinodermos de la expedición del Buque Oceanográfico “Comodoro Rivadavia” A.R.A- Physis, Buenos Aires 19:37–49 +pls. 1–8Google Scholar
  2. Bremec C, Lasta M (2002) Epibenthic assemblage associated with scallop (Zygochlamys patagonica) beds in the Argentinian shelf. Bull Mar Sci 70:89–105Google Scholar
  3. Chia FS (1974) Classification and adaptive significance of developmental patterns in marine invertebrates. Thalassia Jugoslav 10:121–130Google Scholar
  4. Deichmann E (1930) The holothurians of the western part of the Atlantic Ocean. Bull Mus Comp Zool Harv 71:41–226Google Scholar
  5. Emson RH, Wilkie IC (1980) Fission and autotomy in echinoderms. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 18:155–250Google Scholar
  6. Gage JD, Tyler PA (1991) Deep-sea biology: a natural history of organisms of the deep-sea floor. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Gutt J (1991) Investigations on brood protection in Psolus dubiosus (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea) from Antarctica in spring and autumn. Mar Biol 111:281–286View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Hendler G, Littman BS (1986) The ploys of sex: relationships among the mode of reproduction, body size and habitats of coral-reef brittlestars. Coral Reefs 5:31–42View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Hendler G, Peck RW (1988) Ophiuroids off the deep end: fauna of the Belizean fore-reef slope. In: Burke RD, Maldenov PV, Lambert P, Parsley RL (eds) Echinoderm biology. AA Ballkema, Rotterdam, pp 411–419Google Scholar
  10. Hernández DA (1981) Holothuroidea de Puerto Deseado (Santa Cruz, Argentina). Rev Museo Argentino Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia” (Hidrobiología) 4:151–168Google Scholar
  11. Himmelman JH (1975) Phytoplankton as a stimulus for spawning in three marine invertebrates. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 20:199–214View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Himmelman JH, Dumont CP, Gaymer CF, Vallières C, Drolet D (2008) Spawning synchrony and aggregative behaviour of cold-water echinoderms during multi-species mass spawnings. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 361:161–168View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Jablonski D, Lutz RA (1983) Larval ecology of marine benthic invertebrates: paleobiological implications. Biol Rev 58:21–89View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Lawrence JM, Herrera J (2000) Stress and deviant reproduction in echinoderms. Zool Stud 39:151–171Google Scholar
  15. Ludwig H (1897) Brutpflege bei Psolus antarcticus. Zool Anz 20:237–239Google Scholar
  16. Ludwig H (1898) Holothurien der Hamburger Magalhaenische Sammelreise. Wiss Ergebnisse Hamburger Magalh Sammelr 3:1–98Google Scholar
  17. McEuen FS, Chia FS (1991) Development and metamorphosis of two psolid sea cucumbers, Psolus chitonoides and Psolidium bullatum, with a review of reproductive patterns in the family Psolidae (Holothuroidea: Echinodermata). Mar Biol 109:267–279View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Mladenov PV, Burke RD (1994) Echinodermata: asexual propagation. In: Adiyodi KG, Adiyodi RG (eds) Reproductive biology of invertebrates. Asexual propagation and reproductive strategies, vol VI, Part B, chap 9. Oxford & IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi, pp 339–383Google Scholar
  19. Schejter L, Bremec CS, Akselman R, Hernández D, Spivak E (2002) Annual feeding cycle of the Patagonian scallop Zygochlamys patagonica (King and Broderip, 1832) in Reclutas bed (39°S–55°W), Argentine Sea. J Shellfish Res 21:549–555Google Scholar
  20. Smiley S, McEuen FS, Chaffee C, Krishnan S (1991) Echinodermata: Holothuroidea. In: Giese AC, Pearse JS, Pearse VB (eds) Reproduction of marine invertebrates, vol VI. Echinoderms and lophophorates. Boxwood, California, pp 663–750Google Scholar
  21. Strathmann RR, Strathmann MF (1982) The relationship between adult size and brooding in marine invertebrates. Am Nat 119:91–101View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Tyler PA (1988) Seasonality in the deep sea. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 26:227–258Google Scholar
  23. Waloszek D, Waloszek G (1986) Ergebnisse der Forschungsreisen des FFS ‘Walther Herwig’ nach Südamerika, LXV. Vorkommen, Reproduktion, Wachstum und mogliche Nutzbarkeit von Chlamys patagonica (King and Broderip, 1832) (Bivalvia, Pectinidae) auf dem Schelf von Argentinien. Arch Fish Wiss 37:69–99Google Scholar
  24. Young CM, Chia FS (1982) Factors controlling spatial distribution of the sea cucumber Psolus chitonoides: settling and post-settling behavior. Mar Biol 69:195–205View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Springer-Verlag and AWI 2009

Advertisement