Skip to main content

Another bipolar deep-sea anemone: new species of Iosactis (Actiniaria, Endomyaria) from Antarctica

Abstract

A new species of deep-sea burrowing sea anemone is described and illustrated from Antarctica. Iosactis antarctica sp. nov. is characterised by easily deciduous tentacles with sphincters in the base, smooth column, endodermal marginal sphincter, same mesenteries proximally and distally, 24 perfect mesenteries regularly arranged, diffuse retractor musculature and basilar muscles well developed. Iosactis antarctica sp. nov. is the second species of the deep-sea abyssal genus Iosactis; it differs from I. vagabunda in internal anatomy, cnidae and geographic distribution. The description of I. antarctica sp. nov. provides the opportunity to revaluate the morphology of the proximal end of this genus.

Introduction

Recent discoveries of sea anemone biodiversity on some of the most unknown areas of the Antarctic deep-sea, such as the Scotia Sea, show more and more examples of deep-sea polar actiniarians with a bipolar distribution sensu Stepanjants et al. (2006) (see Rodríguez et al. 2009). Examples of these are the genera Actinoscyphia Stephenson, 1920; Antipodactis Rodríguez, López-González and Daly, 2009; Bolocera Studer, 1879; Kadosactis Danielssen, 1890 and Liponema Hertwig, 1882 (see Rodríguez et al. 2009). These genera are similar in being relatively homogenous in morphology; species within each tend to differ only slightly in anatomy and are primarily distinguished by geography (see Dunn 1983; Riemann-Zürneck 1986; Rodríguez and López-González 2005).

Here, I describe a new species of sea anemone from polar seas, Iosactis antarctica sp. nov., from 16 specimens in the Scotia Sea (Antarctica). This new species makes Iosactis Riemann-Zürneck, 1997 the 12th genus of deep-sea anemone with a bipolar distribution. Iosactis antarctica sp. nov. is the second species of the genus, differing in internal anatomy, cnidae and geographic distribution from its congener in the Northern hemisphere, I. vagabunda Riemann-Zürneck, 1997. Additionally, the description of I. antarctica sp. nov. provides the opportunity to re-evaluate the morphology of the proximal end of this genus.

Materials and methods

The material studied was collected on the USARP ELTANIN 9 cruise in 1974 to the Scotia Sea (Antarctica) (Fig. 1). The material was deposited at the US National Museum of Natural History (USNM), where was discovered by the author during a visit. Additional material was collected on the R/V Polarstern cruise ANT XIX/3 (ANDEEP-I) sponsored by the Alfred-Wegener-Institut für Polar-und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, during the austral summer of 2002 to the Scotia Sea (Antarctica).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Geographic distribution of Iosactis antarctica sp. nov. A circle marks the type locality, a star the additional locality

Sea anemones were fixed in 10% sea-water formalin. Preserved specimens were examined whole and some were dissected. Parts of five specimens were dehydrated in butanol (Johansen 1940) and embedded in paraffin. Histological sections 7–10-μm thick were stained with Ramón y Cajal’s Triple Stain (Gabe 1968).

Measurements of cnidae were made from preserved material; small pieces of tissue were smeared on slides and examined using DIC microscopy at 1000× magnification. We scanned through the slides and haphazardly measured 20 capsules of each type (when possible) to generate a range: frequencies given are subjective impressions based on all the cnidae seen on the slides. For each type, a mean and standard deviation has been provided to give an idea of the distribution of sizes; these are not statistically significant (see Williams 1998, 2000 for minimal requirements of statistical significance in cnida sizes), but provide some qualitative information about variability in capsule size for each type of nematocyst. Cnida terminology generally follows Mariscal (1974).

The studied material has been deposited in the American Museum of Natural History in New York (AMNH), and the USNM.

Results

Order Actiniaria Hertwig, 1882

Suborder Nynantheae Carlgren, 1899

Superfamily Endomyaria Stephenson, 1921

Family Iosactiidae Riemann-Zürneck, 1997

Diagnosis

(Modified from Riemann-Zürneck 1997, modifications in italics)

Endomyaria with well-developed or without basilar muscles. Column undifferentiated, smooth, aboral end rounded, with a central, small, invaginated pedal disc. Endodermal marginal sphincter muscle. Twenty-four (?) tentacles, non-retractile, easily deciduous with sphincter in base. Mesenteries regularly arranged, not differentiated into macro- and microcnemes. Same number of mesenteries proximally and distally. Twenty-four mesenteries, all perfect and fertile. Column with strong circular endodermal muscles. Mesenteries with strong parietobasilar muscles and weak diffuse retractors. Cnidom: Robust spirocysts, basitrichs, microbasic b- and p-mastigophores.

Type genus

Iosactis Riemann-Zürneck, 1997, by monotypy.

Genus Iosactis Riemann-Zürneck, 1997

Diagnosis

Same as for the family.

Type species

Iosactis vagabunda Riemann-Zürneck, 1997, by original designation.

Iosactis antarctica sp. nov.

(Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4; Table 1)

Fig. 2
figure 2

External anatomy of Iosactis antarctica sp. nov. a Lateral view of a preserved specimen (USMH 1155319) bearing several tentacles. b Lateral view of preserved specimen without tentacles (AMNH); note the damaged oral disc. c and d Detail of the proximal end showing the invaginated pedal disc. e Detail of the tentacles in specimen USMN (1155319); note that each tentacle corresponds with one endo- or exo-coel. f Detail of the base of a tentacle (USMN 1155319); note the anchorage of the tentacle to the margin of the oral disc. g Lateral view of the orifice left by a detached tentacle (USMN 1155319); note the endodermal marginal sphincter (arrow). h Detail of two orifices left by detached tentacles (arrows). Scale bars a 15 mm; b 20 mm; c, d 4 mm; e, f, g, h 2 mm

Fig. 3
figure 3

Internal anatomy of Iosactis antarctica sp. nov. a Longitudinal section of the distal column showing the endodermal marginal sphincter muscle and the sphincter in the base of the tentacle (arrows); note the well-developed circular musculature in the column. b Cross section of the column through the mesenteries at the level of the actinopharynx showing the cycles of mesenteries; numbers between pairs indicate the cycle of mesenteries. c Detail of the sphincter of a tentacle; note the muscle fibres along the entire base of the tentacle. d Detail of the directive mesenteries, the retractor and the parietobasilar muscles. e, f and h Detail of the marginal column showing the endodermal diffuse to moderately circumscribed marginal sphincter in different specimens. g Longitudinal section of the proximal column showing the invaginated pedal disc (arrows). i Cross section of a tentacle. j Detail of a longitudinal section of the proximal end showing the well-developed basilar muscles. ga gastrodermis, me mesoglea, s siphonoglyph. Scale bars a, c, d, e, f, h, i, j 0.5 mm; b, g 2 mm

Fig. 4
figure 4

Cnidae of Iosactis antarctica sp. nov. a Robust spirocyst. b Basitrich 1. c Basitrich 2. d Basitrich 1. e Basitrich 2. f Basitrich 1. g Basitrich 2. h Basitrich 1. i Basitrich 2. j Basitrich 1. k Microbasic b-mastigophore. l Microbasic p-mastigophore

Table 1 Size ranges of the cnidae of Iosactis antarctica sp. nov. and I. vagabunda (data for I. vagabunda from Riemnn-Zürneck, 1997)

Type material

Holotype: USNM (1155319), 1 specimen, USARP-Eltanin cruise 9, st. 722, Scotia Sea (Antarctica), 56°04′S–56°00′S 33°59′W–33°57′W, 3,138–3,239 m depth, 08 Sep 1963, 5′ Blake trawl. Paratypes: AMNH, 1 specimen; USNM (1155320), 13 specimens; same data as those of holotype for all lots of material.

Additional material

AMNH, 1 specimen, Polarstern ANT XIX/3, stn. PS61/114-10, Scotia Sea (Antarctica), 61°43.70′S 60°42.62′W, 2,852.9–2,856.2 m depth, 19 Feb 2002, Agassiz trawl.

Description

External anatomy

Body elongate (Fig. 2a, b), undifferentiated; column of preserved specimens to 16 mm diameter and 40 mm height. Proximal end rounded with small, central, invaginated pedal disc, to 4 mm in diameter (Figs. 2b–d, 3g). Scapus smooth (Fig. 2), delicate, with 24 mesenterial insertions strongly marked in preserved specimens.

Oral disc of slightly contracted preserved specimens to 15 mm and damaged with internal parts protruding in all specimens examined (Fig. 2b). Tentacles 24(?) in number, easily deciduous (detached—in most specimens), long (to 10 mm) and relatively tough in preserved specimens (Fig. 2a, e, f). Tentacles restricted to margin of oral disc and probably non-retractile, with a well-developed basal sphincter (Fig. 3a, c).

Internal anatomy

Mesenteries hexamerously arranged in two perfect cycles (Fig. 3b). Same number of mesenteries proximally and distally. Two pairs of directives each attached to a well-developed siphonoglyph (Fig. 3b, d). All mesenteries fertile, including directives. Gonochoric specimens collected in February and September with gametogenic tissue well developed (oocytes 500–1,300 μm and spermatic vesicles 190–404 μm in diameter, respectively). Retractor muscles of mesenteries diffuse (Fig. 3d). Parietobasilar muscles strong, well differentiated on both sides of all mesenteries (Fig. 3b, c); muscle fibres on long and thin mesogleal pennon. Basilar muscles well developed (Fig. 3j).

Endodermal marginal sphincter muscle diffuse to moderately circumscribed (Fig. 3a, e, f, h). Ectodermal longitudinal muscles of tentacles and radial muscles of oral disc not observed, absent (?) (Fig. 3i). Column with strong endodermal circular muscles (3a). Column wall of similar thickness entire length, relatively thin: epidermis 0.06–0.19 mm thick; mesoglea 0.12–0.19 mm thick, and gastrodermis 0.17–0.38 mm thick at level of actinopharynx.

Cnidom

Robust spirocysts, basitrichs, and microbasic b- and p-mastigophores (Fig. 4). See Table 1 for size and distribution.

Colour

Preserved material uniform pink to peach.

Etymology

The specific epithet refers to the place where specimens have been collected (Antarctica).

Geographic and bathymetric distribution

Iosactis antarctica sp. nov. has been collected from abyssal waters (2,852–3,239 m) in the Scotia Sea, off the South Sandwich and South Shetland Islands (see Fig. 1). Iosactis antarctica sp. nov. co-exists with other actiniarians: Actinocyphia plebeia (McMurrich, 1893); Antipodactis scotiae Rodríguez, López-González and Daly, 2009; Aulactinia sulcata (Clubb, 1902) and Kadosactis antarctica (Carlgren, 1928). In the South Sandwich Islands (type locality), I. antarctica sp. nov. has been collected with the three former species, whereas in the South Shetlands Islands, it was collected together with all species but A. sulcata (Dunn 1983; Fautin 1984; Rodríguez and López-González 2005; Rodríguez et al. 2009).

Discussion

Differential diagnosis of Iosactis species

As is true for other deep-sea actiniarians, Iosactis antarctica sp. nov. and I. vagabunda are morphologically relatively similar species; however, they differ in size, internal anatomy, cnidae and geographic distribution. Although differences in size (especially in the tentacles) might be an artefact between the two species and are highly dependent on preservation conditions in sea anemones (Stephenson 1920), I. antarctica sp. nov. is almost twice the size of I. vagabunda (to 400 mm length and to 250 mm, respectively). Furthermore, although I. antarctica sp. nov. is relatively larger than I. vagabunda, tentacles are considerably longer in the latter (to 10 mm vs. 25 mm, respectively). Specimens of both species were preserved similarly and their shapes are very similar (see Fig. 1 and Riemann-Zürneck 1997, Fig. 2), suggesting that preservation artefacts should pertain equally and uniformly to both species. Furthermore, Riemann-Zürneck (1997) described the tentacles of I. vagabunda as ‘probably non-retractile’; the fact that her specimens lack longitudinal muscles in the tentacles might be related with the lack of capacity to retract the tentacles; however, her specimens were missing the epidermis and so might be expected to lack epidermal musculature. Some of the tentacles of I. antarctica sp. nov. still retained the epidermis, but even in these, no longitudinal muscles have been detected; the tentacles of I. antarctica sp. nov. are also probably non-retractile. Thus, there is no evidence to expect that the differences in body and tentacle size are an artefact of preservation in this case.

The deciduous tentacles each bearing a sphincter in the base is probably the most distinctive character of Iosactis. Both species of Iosactis differ in the morphology of the tentacular sphincter: in I. antarctica sp. nov., the muscle fibres of the sphincter are distributed along the entire base of the tentacle, whereas in I. vagabunda, the fibres are restricted to the central part of the base of the tentacle (see Fig. 3a, c and Riemann-Zürneck 1997, Fig. 6b). Although there are other endomyarian (Bolocera; Leipsoceras Stephenson, 1918; Liponema) and related actiniarian genera (Boloceractis Panikkar, 1937; Boloceroides Carlgren, 1899 and Bunodeopsis Andres, 1881; within the infraorder Boloceroidaria Carlgren, 1924) with a sphincter in the tentacles, it is not a common feature within Actiniaria (only 6 genera of the 430 genera within the order). Like Iosactis, Bolocera and Liponema are deep-sea bipolar genera; however, molecular data suggest that not all genera with tentacular sphincters are closely related (ER unpubl. data), supporting Riemann-Zürneck’s (1997) contention that this might be an adaptation to the deep-sea environment.

Riemann-Zürneck (1997) commented that the central pit at the proximal end in Iosactis vagabunda seemed as a small, invaginated pedal disc; however, she did not find basilar muscles in I. vagabunda or provided any picture of the aboral end of I. vagabunda. Thus, according to Riemann-Zürneck’s (1997) description, the well-developed basilar muscles in I. antarctica sp. nov. (Fig. 3j) distinguish it from I. vagabunda. Additionally, these basilar muscles confirm that, although small, Iosactis species have a pedal disc. Thus, the diagnosis of the family and genus has been modified accordingly.

Both species of Iosactis are the same in having 12 pairs of perfect and fertile mesenteries and diffuse retractor muscles but strong parietal muscles. However, the morphology of the endodermal marginal sphincter differs: in I. antarctica sp. nov., the sphincter is diffuse to moderately circumscribed (with a few relatively thin mesogleal processes) (Fig. 3a, e, f, h), whereas in I. vagabunda, the sphincter is circumscribed-pinnate, with the muscle fibres sited on a well-developed and relatively thick branch of mesoglea (see Riemann-Zürneck 1997, Fig. 6b). The variation of the sphincter shape depends on the species; on some of them, the sphincter shape is of uniform appearance, whereas in others, the sphincter varies depending on the contraction of the specimen (England 1987). The variability of the sphincter within I. antarctica sp. nov. has been checked by sectioning four specimens in different states of contraction.

The types and size ranges of cnida are very similar in the species of Iosactis (Table 1; Fig. 4). However, there are slight differences: the basitrichs in the filaments and the basitrichs 1 in the base and scapus of I. antarctica sp. nov. are larger than those of I. vagabunda. Furthermore, despite the overlap in size ranges for most types of nematocysts, the cnidae of I. antarctica sp. nov. are notably larger than those of I. vagabunda; in most cases the size ranges overlap only slightly (e.g. basitrichs 2 in the base, scapus and tentacles overlap only in 1 μm, see Table 1). Although three specimens of I. antarctica sp. nov. had few undamaged tentacles (with epidermis still present) attached, spirocysts were not found in the tentacles, as occurs in I. vagabunda. As in I. vagabunda, robust spirocysts were found in the pedal disc of I. antarctica sp. nov. The presence of spirocysts in the pedal disc (‘aboral pit’ in I. vagabunda), but not in the column of the species of Iosactis, supports the interpretation that the aboral end is a pedal disc in this genus.

Iosactis antarctica sp. nov. has been found in deep Antarctic seas; I. vagabunda has been found in the abyssal Porcupine planes in the North Atlantic Sea. Both species have been collected from abyssal soft bottoms. Riemann-Zürneck (1997) considered I. vagabunda endemic to the abyssal Porcupine planes based on the particularity of this habitat (see Rice et al. 1994) and her own observations. Iosactis antarctica sp. nov. has been found in two localities, with relatively large distance between them; this suggests that I. antarctica sp. nov. has a less restricted distribution than I. vagabunda. Because of the restricted distribution of I. vagabunda, genetic connection between both species of Iosactis is unlikely, further supporting the distinction between I. antarctica sp. nov. and I. vagabunda.

Deep-sea bipolar sea anemones

As is true for other bipolar deep-sea species of sea anemones, in Iosactis species, the differences between anatomy and cnidae are relatively small (e.g. Antipodactis, Bolocera, Kadosactis, Liponema, see Dunn 1983; Riemann-Zürneck 1986; Rodríguez and López-González 2005; Rodríguez et al. 2009). Furthermore, some of these genera have some morphological characters in common (e.g. deciduous tentacles with sphincters, cnidom, etc.). However, the most significant common feature is their life in deep-water habitats on unconsolidated sea floors. This suggests that although there may be a strong selection for certain adaptations in the deep-sea, cnida size is not under strong selective pressure in deep and polar seas. Increasing our knowledge on some areas of deep-sea in Antarctica, such the Scotia and the Weddell seas, will slowly help discerning broader patterns of distribution and evolution of this particular actiniarian fauna.

References

  1. Andres A (1881) Prodromus neapolitanae actiniarum faunae addito generalis actiniarum bibliographiae catalogo. Mitt Zool Stn Neapel 2:305–371

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carlgren O (1899) Zoantharien. Hamburger Magalhaensische Sammelreise 4(1):1–48

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carlgren O (1924) On Boloceroides, Bunodeopsis and their supposed allied genera. Ark Zool 17A(1):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carlgren O (1928) Actiniaria der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition. Wiss Ergebn Dt Tiefsee-Exped 4(22):125–266

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clubb JA (1902) Actiniae. With an account of their peculiar brood chambers. In: Report on the collections of natural history made in the Antarctic regions during the voyage of the “Southern Cross”, pp 294–309

  6. Danielssen DC (1890) Actinida. Den Norske Nordhavs-Expedition 1876–1878. Zoologi. Grøndahl and Søn, Christiania

  7. Dunn DF (1983) Some Antarctic and sub-Antarctic sea anemones (Coelenterata: Ptychodactiaria and Actiniaria). Ant Res Ser 39(1):1–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. England KW (1987) Certain Actiniaria (Cnidaria: Anthozoa) from the Red Sea and tropical Indo-Pacific Ocean. Bull Brit Mus Nat Hist 53(4):205–292

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fautin DF (1984) More Antarctic and Subantarctic sea anemones (Coelenterata: Corallimorpharia and Actiniaria). Biol Antarctic Seas XIV, Ant Res Ser 41:1–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gabe M (1968) Technique Histologique. Massou et Cie, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hertwig R (1882) Die Actinien der Challenger Expedition. Gustav Fischer, Jena

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johansen DA (1940) Plant microtechniques. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mariscal RN (1974) Nematocysts. In: Muscatine L, Lenhoff HM (eds) Coelenterate biology. Academic Press, New York, pp 129–178

    Google Scholar 

  14. McMurrich JP (1893) Report on the Actiniae collected by the United States Fish Commission Steamer Albatross during the winter of 1887–1888. Proc US Nat Mus 16(930):119–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Panikkar NK (1937) The morphology and systematic relationships of a new boloceroidarian from brackish-water near Madras, together with an account of its asexual reproduction. Proc Indiana Acad Sci 5B(2):76–90

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rice AL, Thurston MH, Bett BJ (1994) The IOSDL DEEPSEAS programme: introduction and photographic evidence for the presence and absence of a seasonal input of phytodetritus at contrasting abyssal sites in the northeastern Atlantic. Deep-Sea Res I 41:1305–1320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Riemann-Zürneck K (1986) Zur Biogeographie des Südwestatlantik mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Seeanemonen (Coelenterata: Actiniaria). Helgol Meeresunters 40:91–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Riemann-Zürneck K (1997) A hemisessile anemone from the Porcupine Abyssal Plain, North Atlantic Ocean: Iosactis vagabunda gen. nov., sp. nov. J Mar Biol Ass UK 77:1011–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rodríguez E, López-González PJ (2005) New record of the sea anemone Kadosactis antarctica (Carlgren, 1928): redescription of an Antarctic deep-sea sea anemone, and a discussion of its generic and familiar placement. Helgol Mar Res 59(4):301–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rodríguez E, López-González PJ, Daly M (2009) New family of sea anemones (Actiniaria, Acontiaria) from deep polar seas. Polar Biol 32:703–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stepanjants SD, Cortese G, Kruglikova SB, Bjørklund KR (2006) A review of bipolarity concepts: history and examples from Radiolaria and Medusozoa (Cnidaria). Mar Biol Res 2:200–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stephenson TA (1918) On certain Actiniaria collected off Ireland by the Irish Fisheries Department, during the years of 1899–1913. Proc R Irish Acad 34B(7):06–164

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stephenson TA (1920) On the classification of Actiniaria. Part I. Forms with acontia and forms with a mesogleal sphincter. Q J Microsc Sci 64:425–574

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stephenson TA (1921) On the classification of Actiniaria. II. Q J Microsc Sci 65:493–576

    Google Scholar 

  25. Studer T (1879) Zweite Abtheilung der Anthozoa polyactinia, welche während der Reise S. M. S. Corvette Gazelle um die Erde gesammelt wurden. Monat Akad Wiss (Berlin) 25:524–550

    Google Scholar 

  26. Williams RB (1998) Measurements of cnidae from sea anemones (Cnidaria: Actiniaria), II: further studies of differences amongst sample means and their taxonomic relevance. Sci Mar 62:361–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Williams RB (2000) Measurements of cnidae from sea anemones (Cnidaria: Actiniaria), III: ranges and other measures of statistical dispersion, their interrelations and taxonomic relevance. Sci Mar 64:49–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to PJ. López-González (Universidad de Sevilla) and Prof. Angelika Brandt (Zoological Institut and Zoological Museum, Hamburg) for making possible the participation in the Antarctic cruise ANDEEP-I. Thanks to M. Conradi (Universidad de Sevilla) who collected the material from ANDEEP-I in this manuscript and to T. Coffer (USNM) for his help with the material from USNM in this manuscript. Partial support was provided by Spanish CICYT projects: REN2001-4269-E and CGL2004-20141-E. This is ANDEEP publication number 149.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Estefanía Rodríguez.

Additional information

Communicated by H.-D. Franke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodríguez, E. Another bipolar deep-sea anemone: new species of Iosactis (Actiniaria, Endomyaria) from Antarctica. Helgol Mar Res 66, 211–218 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10152-011-0263-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10152-011-0263-2

Keywords

  • Anthozoa
  • Cnidaria
  • Deep-sea
  • Scotia Sea
  • Taxonomy