Mesoscale advection of Upogebia pusilla larvae through an upwelling filament in the Canaries Coastal Transition Zone (CTZ)
© Springer-Verlag and AWI 2012
Received: 21 February 2011
Accepted: 29 December 2011
Published: 8 January 2012
Larval transport has a strong influence on marine populations and ecosystem function. Traditional hypotheses establish that larvae of coastal species are swept offshore during strong upwelling periods producing low recruitment rates; however, recent studies have demonstrated that this hypothesis is not supported by larval distribution data. The present study examines the influence of upwelling filaments on larval advection and wastage. During August 1993, the transport of Upogebia pusilla was analysed in relation to an offshore filament off Northwest Africa. This mesoscale structure was generated by a trapped, quasi-permanent cyclonic eddy located between the Canary Islands and the African shelf and extended 150 km westward into the oligotrophic open ocean waters. The horizontal distribution depicted by U. pusilla larvae was strongly influenced by the oceanographic features of the Canaries Coastal Transition Zone (CTZ). Specifically, the larvae were closely associated with upwelling front and filament position, showing that these neritic larvae can be advected 10–100s of kilometres offshore through the filament. However, the low larval densities observed in the samples suggest that many larvae might remain close to the coast, thus avoiding seaward transport. This implies that filaments probably do not significantly affect the recruitment success of intertidal invertebrates such us U. pusilla in upwelling systems.
KeywordsUpogebia pusilla Larval transport Upwelling filament Canaries CTZ
Ocean currents have long been recognized as a major factor in larval transport, one that plays an important role in population and ecosystem dynamics (Roughgarden et al. 1988; Shanks 1995). Transport processes during the larval phase are critical, since retentive and dispersive phenomena could determine larval fate. This is of special interest in recruitment limited regions, such as upwelling systems, where dispersive mechanisms exert a strong influence over the nearshore communities (Ebert and Russell 1988; Connolly and Roughgarden 1998; Menge et al. 2003). According to these authors, the larvae behave as “passive” particles that may therefore be swept offshore during upwelling periods and shoreward during downwelling periods. The upwelling circulation could transport larvae far from shore preventing them from settlement, thereby resulting in a high loss of potential recruits. Consequently, these authors suggested that the strength and temporal variation of upwelling might explain the variations in recruitment in these particular ecosystems. However, recent studies have pointed out that the hypothesis of rapid larval transport during upwelling/downwelling may be incorrect (Shanks et al. 2003; Shanks and Brink 2005; Shanks and Shearman 2009; Morgan et al. 2009a, b; Morgan and Fisher 2010). In fact, these studies found no consistent differences in the cross-shelf distribution of invertebrate larvae during upwelling and downwelling periods. This suggests that larval retention may be more widespread in upwelling regions than is widely believed and, therefore, recruitment variations must be explained in other ways.
Upwelling filaments are seasonally important components of the circulation throughout the eastern boundary upwelling regions and can transport zooplankton from the continental shelf to the open ocean (Barton et al. 1998). The causes of these filaments are varied. They can be formed by (1) the convergence of different water masses near the coast giving rise to unidirectional flow in water tongues towards the ocean ending with “T” or mushroom shapes (Marín et al. 2003), (2) an eddy slowly moving parallel to the coast (Barton et al. 1998) or (3) an unstable coastal jet, generating meanders and displacing upwelled waters towards the ocean (Strub et al. 1991).
The Moroccan subregion presents year-round upwelling, characterized by high levels of mesoscale oceanographic activity, such as eddies and filaments, during summer (Arístegui et al. 2009). Near Cape Juby and Cape Bojador, the Canary Islands archipelago introduces mesoscale variability in the form of downstream vortices (Arístegui et al. 1994) that frequently entrain upwelled waters (Barton et al. 2004). Moreover, the combination of weak stratification, wide continental shelf and persistent favourable winds can aid the formation of filament structures near those capes (Marchesiello and Estrade 2009). These filaments usually are less than 20 km wide and 200 m in depth in the Canaries Coastal Transition Zone (CTZ) and exert influence over the nano- and picoplankton (Baltar et al. 2009), phytoplankton (Navarro-Pérez and Barton 1998) and mesozooplankton communities (Hernández-León et al. 2002). Several case studies demonstrate strong offshore advection of eggs and fish larvae in the Moroccan upwelling area (Rodríguez et al. 1999, 2004; Bécognée et al. 2009). Despite the basic knowledge of plankton–filament interaction, there are no studies on the current-related transport of invertebrate larvae.
The main goal of this paper is to analyse the offshore distribution pattern of the mud shrimp Upogebia pusilla larvae in relation to a filament structure during a strong upwelling period off NW Africa. We hypothesize that these larvae may be transported to the open ocean, as was previously observed for fish larvae during the same cruise (Rodríguez et al. 1999). A second objective is to provide new insights into larval dynamics to improve understanding of the fluctuations in recruitment in upwelling areas. The growing demand of U. pusilla as live bait by recreational anglers has led to a decline in natural populations (Faleiro and Narciso 2009). However, management of these harvested bait stocks is rendered difficult by lack of information about the biology of this species from shallow soft bottoms. The present study is a contribution to the knowledge of the African populations of this mud shrimp and will be useful to the future establishment of protocols for fishery management.
Materials and Methods
In the laboratory, the larvae of Upogebia pusilla were sorted, counted and standardized to number per 100 m3. The species identification and developmental stage were determined according to dos Santos and Paula (2003). Sampling was conducted around the clock, and consequently, diel vertical migrations could obscure the horizontal pattern observed (Queiroga and Blanton 2005). Therefore, one-way ANOVA was performed to compare the difference in larval abundance between day samples (station numbers: 42, 56–59, 65–67, 74–78, 82–86, 90–94, 99–102) and night samples (station numbers: 46, 45, 51, 61–64, 69–73, 80, 81, 88, 95, 96, 98).
Hierarchal clustering was performed to identify environmental assemblages among stations in the studied area. The cluster classification was represented in terms of the Euclidean distance dissimilarity matrix with the normalized oceanographic data (temperature and salinity) at (1) the sea surface, (2) 25 m and (3) 50 m depth (Clarke and Warwick 2001). These multivariate analyses were carried out using the PRIMER v6 statistical package (Clarke and Gorley 2006). To test whether the abundance of U. pusilla larvae was similar across the studied area, we used a one-way ANOVA that incorporated as factors the groups of stations detected in the cluster classification based on the oceanographic data. Prior to ANOVA, homogeneity of variance was confirmed by Levene’s tests. In addition, nonparametric Spearman rank correlation was used to explore the relationship between environmental variables and larval abundance of U. pusilla (early, middle and advanced stages of development). All Spearman rank correlations and ANOVA analyses were carried out with the SPSS statistical package.
Spearman correlation matrix between oceanographic variables and abundances of early, intermediate and advanced larvae of U. pusilla
Finally, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated that the abundances of U. pusilla larvae, in all stages of development, were significantly higher at the stations influenced by upwelling and filament structure than in the typical well-stratified oceanic waters (early stage: F = 7.40, P = 0.009; intermediate stage: F = 8.03, P = 0.007; advanced stage: F = 5.58, P = 0.02).
It is often difficult to determine the source and fate of marine organisms, because their planktonic larvae spend considerable time developing in ocean currents that may transport them far from their natal populations (Morgan et al. 2009a). In our case, following the moulting cycle of U. pusilla larvae through the studied area, it is possible to discern information about their origin. The larvae displayed a horizontal distribution strongly influenced by the oceanographic processes. They were almost restricted to the African shelf and the oceanic area occupied by the filament structure. Therefore, the African coast seems the most probable origin of these U. pusilla larvae. Barton et al. (1998) observed that the position of this filament varied little in AVHRR and CZCS imagery during the weeks preceding the cruise. If we assume that the larval stages of U. pusilla last around 28 days (dos Santos and Paula 2003), the filament persistence during August 1993 can explain the presence of late larval stages (megalopa) at offshore stations. In addition, the advection pattern depicted by the mud shrimp larvae has almost exactly the same horizontal distribution as that observed for Sardina pilchardus larvae by Rodríguez et al. (1999) when they studied the ichthyoplankton on this same cruise. The larvae of S. pilchardus are considered a good tracer of the movement of African upwelled waters by filaments in this region (Bécognée et al. 2006; Moyano et al. 2009). Thus, the correlation between two larval patterns also supports the association with the filament.
U. pusilla inhabits the relatively shallow waters between the intertidal zone and 65 m depth (Udekem d’Acoz 1999), and consequently, one would expect the larval abundances of this mud shrimp to be concentrated nearshore and diminish seawards. This larval retention pattern of shallow-water crustaceans has been observed in the Portuguese (dos Santos et al. 2008), Californian (Morgan et al. 2009a, b, Shanks and Shearman 2009) and Chilean (Yannicelli et al. 2006a, b) upwelling regions. We observed higher larval concentrations in the upwelling front, but due to the nature of our study, we were unable to sample nearshore areas (<5 km offshore), which prevented the description of the complete larval distribution pattern of U. pusilla. We observed a long-distance transport (20–150 km), but the low densities suggest that only some larvae were affected by filament transport. The results from Shanks and Shearman (2009) and Morgan et al. (2009a, b) clearly demonstrated that larvae of intertidal invertebrates remain close to the coast during upwelling and downwelling periods. In particular, Shanks and Shearman (2009) found that high densities (10–100 larvae m−3) of Neotrypaea californianus remained within 2 km of the coast and avoided seaward transport. Yannicelli et al. (2006b) reported even higher densities (up to 30,000 larvae m−3) of N. uncinata in the entrance of a shallow bay. Considering this distribution pattern of N. californianus and N. uncinata (very common mud shrimps with similar habitat and distribution as U. pusilla), it is logical to think that the majority of the larval population of the U. pusilla was not sampled during the cruise because the peak of larval distribution most likely was in the nearshore waters of the African coast.
Determining the fate of these larvae that were dispersed offshore is also difficult. The filaments can sweep larvae far out to the open ocean without the possibility of finding suitable habitats in which to settle. As long as they remain in the oceanic area, they are exposed to strong predation pressure by diel vertical migrants in the ocean (Hopkins and Gartner 1992; Hernández-León 2008) that lead to a progressive decline and disappearance of the larvae. On the other hand, Barton et al. (1998) reported that a significant part of the offshore flow can return to the upwelling area by means of the cyclonic eddy around which the filament is entrained (Fig. 2). The cyclonic circuit, which has a recirculation time of about 7 days, has been reported as a mechanism for the return of many fish larvae to the continental coast, their place of origin (Rodríguez et al. 1999), thus constituting an “ocean triad” (sensu Bakun 1998). The horizontal distribution of U. pusilla larvae suggests that larvae are also recirculated and retained in the filament–eddy system.
Other different transport scenarios reported for the Canaries CTZ concluded that the filaments can sweep larvae far to the open ocean without any possibility of their return to the African coast. Satellite images (Hernández-Guerra et al. 1993; Arístegui et al. 1997; Barton et al. 2004) have shown that eddies detached from the central and eastern islands of the Archipelago, occasionally interact with the offshore boundary of the filaments, entraining upwelled water and extending their transport much further westward. Several authors have observed that fish larvae displaced by the filament system can be transported towards the innermost islands (Rodríguez et al. 2004) to reach the coasts of Gran Canaria Island (Bécognée et al. 2006; Moyano et al. 2009). Therefore, if the larvae are able to avoid predation, the filaments could maintain a unidirectional gene flow between the invertebrate populations of the African coast and Canary Islands, playing a significant role in dispersal and connectivity.
Various authors have attributed the variations in recruitment of intertidal sea urchins, barnacles, mussels and crabs to oscillations in upwelling strength (Ebert and Russell 1988; Roughgarden et al. 1988; Connolly and Roughgarden 1998; Navarrete et al. 2005; Palma et al. 2006; Broitman et al. 2008). They observed lower recruitment rates near capes and headlands, preferred sites of upwelling filaments. The low larval densities of U. pusilla observed in the filament in our case suggests that only a small fraction of the larval pool is transported far from shore by this mesoscale structure. Therefore, recruitment variability of intertidal invertebrates might not be explained by local larval wastage due to advection in filaments. Sampling must be extended to the nearshore regions to contrast the fraction of intertidal larvae swept offshore by upwelling filaments with the fraction retained in the coastal area.
We thank Dr. M. Thiel and three anonymous referees for their useful comments and suggestions that helped improve the manuscript. JML was supported by the Spanish FPI research grant BES-2005-10960.
- Arístegui J, Sangrà P, Hernández-León S, Cantón M, Hernández-Guerra A, Kerling JL (1994) Island-induced eddies in the Canary Islands. Deep-Sea Res I 41:1509–1525View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arístegui J, Tett P, Hernández-Guerra A, Basterretxea G, Montero MF, Wild K, Sangrà P, Hernández-León S, Cantón M, García-Braun JA, Pacheco M, Barton ED (1997) The influence of island-generated eddies on chlorophyll distribution: a study of mesoscale variation around Gran Canaria. Deep-Sea Res I 44:71–96View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arístegui J, Barton ED, Álvarez-Salgado XA, Santos AMP, Figueiras FG, Kifani S, Hernández-León S, Masona E, Machúe E, Demarcqf H (2009) Sub-regional ecosystem variability in the Canary Current upwelling. Progr Oceanogr 83:33–48View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bakun A (1998) Ocean triads and radical interdecadal stock variability: bane and boon for fishery management science. In: Pauly D, Pitcher TJ, Hartand PJB (eds) Reinventing fisheries management. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 331–358View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baltar F, Arístegui J, Montero M, Espino M, Gasol J, Hernld G (2009) Mesoscale variability modulates seasonal changes in the trophic structure of nano- and picoplankton communities across the NW Africa-Canary Islands transition zone. Progr Oceanogr 83:180–188View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barton ED, Arístegui J, Tett P, Cantón M, García-Braun J, Hernández-León S, Nykjaer L, Almeida C, Almunia J, Ballesteros S, Basterretxea G, Escánez J, García-Weill L, Hernández-Guerra A, López-Latzen F, Molina R, Montero MF, Navarro-Pérez E, Van Lenning K, Vélez H, Wild K (1998) The transition zone of the Canary Current upwelling region. Progr Oceanogr 41:455–504View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barton ED, Arístegui J, Tett P, Navarro-Pérez E (2004) Variability in the Canary Islands area of the filaments-eddy exchanges. Progr Oceanogr 62:71–94View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bécognée P, Almeida C, Barrera A, Hernández-Guerra A, Hernández-León S (2006) Annual cycle of cupleiform larvae around Gran Canaria Island. Fish Oceanogr 15:293–300View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bécognée P, Moyano M, Almeida C, Rodríguez JM, Fraile-Nuez E, Hernández-Guerra A, Hernández-León S (2009) Mesoscale distribution of clupeoid larvae in an upwelling filament trapped by a quasi-permanent cyclonic eddy off Northwest Africa. Deep-Sea Res I 56:330–343View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Broitman B, Blanchette C, Menge B, Lubchenco J, Krenz C, Foley M, Raimondi P, Lohse D, Gaines S (2008) Spatial and temporal patterns of invertebrate recruitment along the west coast of the United States. Ecol Monogr 78:403–421View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clarke K, Gorley R (2006) PRIMER v6: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E Ltd., PlymouthGoogle Scholar
- Clarke K, Warwick R (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edn. PRIMER-E, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
- Connolly R, Roughgarden J (1998) A latitudinal gradient in northeast Pacific intertidal community structure: evidence for an oceanographically based synthesis of marine community theory. Am Nat 151:311–326PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- dos Santos A, Paula J (2003) Redescription of the larval stages of Upogebia pusilla (Petagna, 1792) (Thalassinidea, Upogebiidae) from laboratory-reared material. Invertebr Reprod Dev 43:83–90View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- dos Santos A, Santos AMP, Conway DVP, Bartilotti C, Lourenço P, Queiroga H (2008) Dial vertical migration of decapod larvae in the Portuguese coastal upwelling ecosystem: implications for offshore transport. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 359:171–183View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ebert TA, Russell MP (1988) Latitudinal variation in size structure of the west coast purple sea urchin: a correlation with headlands. Limnol Oceanogr 33:286–294View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Faleiro F, Narciso L (2009) Brachionus vs Artemia duel: optimizing first feeding of Upogebia pusilla (Decapoda: Thalassinidea) larvae. Aquaculture 295:205–208View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hernández-Guerra A, Arístegui J, Cantón M, Nykjaer L (1993) Phytoplankton pigment patterns in the Canary Islands area as determined using coastal zone colour scanner data. Int J Remote Sens 14:1431–1437View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hernández-León S (2008) Natural variability of fisheries and lunar illumination: a hypothesis. Fish Fisheries 9:138–154View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hernández-León S, Almeida C, Portillo-Hahnefeld P, Gómez M, Rodríguez JM, Arístegui J (2002) Zooplankton biomass and indices of feeding and metabolism in relation to an upwelling filament off northwest Africa. J Mar Res 60:327–346View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hopkins TL, Gartner JV (1992) Resource-partitioning and predation impact of a low-latitude myctophid community. Mar Biol 114:185–197View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marchesiello P, Estrade P (2009) Eddy activity and mixing in upwelling systems: a comparative study of Northwest Africa and California regions. Int J Earth Sci 98:299–308View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marín VCH, Delgado LE, Luna-Jorquera G (2003) S-chlorophyll squirts at 30 degrees S off the Chilean coast (eastern South Pacific): feature tracking analysis. J Geophys Res 108(C12):3378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC001935 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Menge BA, Lubchenco J, Bracken MES, Chan F, Foley MM, Freidenburg TL, Gaines SD, Hudson G, Krenz C, Leslie H, Menge DNL, Russell R, Webster MS (2003) Coastal oceanography sets the pace of rocky intertidal community dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:12229–12234PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Morgan S, Fisher J (2010) Larval behaviour regulates nearshore retention and offshore migration in an upwelling shadow and along the open coast. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 404:109–126View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Morgan SG, Fisher JL, Mace AJ, Akins L, Slaughter AM, Bollens SM (2009a) Cross-shelf distributions and recruitment of crab postlarvae in a region of strong upwelling. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 380:173–185View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Morgan SG, Fisher JL, Miller SH, McAfee ST, Largier JL (2009b) Nearshore larval retention in a region of strong upwelling and recruitment limitation. Ecology 90:3489–3502PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moyano M, Rodríguez JM, Hernández-León S (2009) Larval fish abundance and distribution during the late winter bloom off Gran Canaria Island, Canary Islands. Fish Oceanogr 18:51–61View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Navarrete SA, Wieters EA, Broitman BR, Castilla JC (2005) Scales of benthic–pelagic coupling and the intensity of species interactions: from recruitment limitation to top-down control. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:18046–18051PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Navarro-Pérez E, Barton ED (1998) The physical structure of an upwelling filament off the northwest African coast during August 1993. In: Pillar CL, Moloney AIL, Payne F A, Shillington SC (eds) Benguela dynamics: impacts of variability on shelf-sea environments and their living resources. South African J Mar Sci 19:61–74Google Scholar
- Palma AT, Pardo LM, Veas RI, Cartes C, Silva M, Manriquez K, Diaz A, Munoz C, Ojeda FP (2006) Coastal brachyuran decapods: settlement and recruitment under contrasting coastal geometry conditions. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 316:139–153View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Queiroga H, Blanton J (2005) Interactions between behaviour and physical forcing in the control of horizontal transport of decapod crustacean larvae. Adv Mar Biol 47:107–214PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rodríguez JM, Hernández-León S, Barton ED (1999) Mesoscale distribution of fish larvae in relation to an upwelling filament off Northwest Africa. Deep-Sea Res I 46:1969–1984View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rodríguez JM, Barton ED, Hernández-León S, Arístegui J (2004) The influence of mesoscale physical processes on the larval fish community in the Canaries CTZ, in summer. Progr Oceanogr 62:171–188View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Roughgarden J, Gaines S, Possingham H (1988) Recruitment dynamics in complex life cycles. Science 241:1460–1466PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shanks A (1995) Mechanisms of cross-shelf dispersal of larval invertebrates and fish. In: McEdward L (ed) Ecology of marine invertebrate larvae. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 323–368Google Scholar
- Shanks A, Brink L (2005) Upwelling, downwelling, and cross-shelf transport of bivalve larvae: test of a hypothesis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 302:1–12View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shanks A, Shearman R (2009) Paradigm lost? Cross-shelf distributions of intertidal invertebrate larvae are unaffected by upwelling or downwelling. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 385:189–204View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shanks A, Largier J, Brubaker J (2003) Observations on the distribution of meroplankton during an upwelling event. J Plankton Res 25:645–667View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Strub PT, Kosro PM, Huyer A (1991) The nature of the cold filaments in the California current system. J Geophys Res 96(C8):14743–14768View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Udekem d’Acoz Cd’ (1999) Inventaire et distribution des crustacés décapodes de l’Atlantique oriental, de la Méditerranée et des eaux continentales au nord de 25°N. Collection Patrimoines Naturels (M.N.H.N./S.P.N.) 40:1–383Google Scholar
- Yannicelli B, Castro L, Schneider W, Sobarzo M (2006a) Crustacean larvae distribution in the coastal upwelling zone off Central Chile. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 319:175–189View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yannicelli B, Castro L, Valle-Levinson A, Atkinson L, Figueroa D (2006b) Vertical distribution of decapod larvae in the entrance of an equatorward facing bay of central Chile: implications for transport. J Plankton Res 28:19–37View ArticleGoogle Scholar