Open Access

Distribution and biological features of the common pandora, Pagellus erythrinus (Linnaeus, 1758), in the southern Tyrrhenian Sea (Central Mediterranean)

  • B. Busalacchi1Email author,
  • T. Bottari1,
  • D. Giordano1,
  • A. Profeta1 and
  • P. Rinelli1
Helgoland Marine Research201468:404

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10152-014-0404-5

Received: 13 September 2013

Accepted: 25 June 2014

Published: 11 July 2014

Abstract

A synthetic analysis of the distribution, abundance and some biological traits of the common pandora (Pagellus erythrinus) was performed. Data were gathered in 15 experimental bottom trawl surveys carried out off the southern Tyrrhenian Sea from 1994 to 2008. A total of 2,166 P. erythrinus were found in the investigated area, with a preference for the upper continental shelf (10–100 m). The highest persistence was recorded in the trawl-banned areas. The sex ratio Sr = F/(F + M) ranged between 0.60 and 0.96 (overall 0.78). The size at which 50 % of the individuals were mature was 157 and 170 mm total length for females and males, respectively. The length–weight relationship for all individuals was described by the following parameters: a = 0.016 and b = 2.905. Growth was evaluated (sexes combined) by applying length-based methods; up to eight significant modal components were evidenced. The von Bertalanffy growth parameters for the whole population were estimated at L  = 454 mm, K = 0.08 and t 0 = −2.57. The present results are in agreement with the information available for the other Mediterranean stocks suggesting common biological features.

Keywords

Pagellus erythrinus Distribution Biological traits Growth Mediterranean Sea

Introduction

The common pandora Pagellus erythrinus (Linnaeus 1758) is a gregarious demersal species living on rocky and muddy–sandy bottoms, between 20 and 300 m depth (Bauchot and Hureau 1986; Santos et al. 1995). It occurs in the eastern Atlantic from Norway to Angola including the Mediterranean and Black Seas (Bauchot and Hureau 1986; Froese and Pauly 2014).

Standard length (SL) of individuals can reach a maximum of 600 mm but most frequently range from 100 to 300 mm (Froese and Pauly 2014).

The species shows protogynous hermaphroditism (Girardin and Quignard 1985; Papaconstantinou et al. 1988; Livadas 1989; Pajuelo and Lorenzo 1998); females usually become males from the second to the third year at sizes of 170–180 mm total length (TL; Relini et al. 1999). However, the sexual pattern seems to be much more complex as both primary males and specimens, which are still females at the known maximum size, are frequently identified (Larrañeta 1964). The spawning season lasts from March to November in the Mediterranean Sea and from May to August in the Atlantic waters (Hashem and Gassim 1981; Girardin and Quignard 1985; Papaconstantinou et al. 1988; Livadas 1989; Pajuelo and Lorenzo 1998; Hoşsucu and Çakır 2003; Coelho et al. 2010; Tsikliras et al. 2010). Sexual maturity is reached between the second and the third year of life (Girardin and Quignard 1985; Pajuelo and Lorenzo 1998). The species can be considered a generalist predator; it feeds on Decapoda, Bivalvia, Polychaeta, Euphausiacea, Teleostei, Mysidacea and Cephalopoda (Ardizzone and Messina 1983; Šantić et al. 2011).

Pagellus erythrinus is an appreciated fishery resource in the Mediterranean and Atlantic waters (Erzini et al. 1998; Abellán and Basurco 1999). Signs of overexploitation of the species’ standing stock have been reported in diverse Mediterranean geographical sub-areas (GSAs) (Vassilopoulou et al. 1986; Jarboui et al. 1998; Abella et al. 2010; Mehanna 2011; Gurbet et al. 2012) and also in Sicilian waters (Fiorentino et al. 2012). In Italy, P. erythrinus is one of the most common landed seabreams, although total landings have declined in recent years from a total of approximately 1,900 t in 2004 to 850 t in 2010 (IREPA 2011). In the Mediterranean Sea, the current conservation legislation on fisheries sets the minimum size limit for this species at 150 mm TL (EU Regulation 1967/2006).

There is little published information on P. erythrinus for the southern Tyrrhenian Sea (Spedicato et al. 2002; Busalacchi et al. 2010; Giacalone et al. 2010) where it plays an important role in the demersal fish community of the upper continental shelf area (10–100 m) (Busalacchi et al. 2010).

In the present paper, we present a synthetic analysis of the distribution, abundance and biological traits of the common pandora in the southern Tyrrhenian Sea using data from experimental bottom trawl surveys.

Materials and methods

Data here reported come from 15 bottom trawl surveys carried out during the “International Bottom Trawl Survey in the Mediterranean” (MEDITS Project) in late spring–summer periods from 1994 to 2008. The study area extended from Cape Suvero to Cape S. Vito (Fig. 1), at depths of 10–800 m, covering a total area of 7,256 km2. The sea floor of this area is characterized by a narrow, sometimes nearly missing continental shelf, and by a steep slope with spatial contiguity to the bathymetrics. Only 65 % (4,716 km2) of the total area can be trawled by commercial vessels because the Gulf of Castellammare and the Gulf of Patti have been stated Fishery Exclusion Zones in 1990. Trawl fishing is banned on the continental shelf and part of the slope, i.e. for 200 km2 of the Castellammare Gulf and for the whole area (242 km2) of the Patti Gulf; artisanal and recreational fishing are permitted.
Fig. 1

Map of the study area showing the trawl banned areas of the Gulfs of Castellammare and Patti

Sampling procedures were the same in all surveys, according to the MEDITS project protocol (Relini et al. 2008). Sampling was carried out randomly, and the hauls were proportionately distributed in five bathymetric strata: 10–50 m (622 km2), 51–100 m (1,003 km2), 101–200 m (1,224 km2), 201–500 m (1,966 km2) and 501–800 m (2,441 km2). A total of 383 hauls were carried out. As the species was found almost exclusively in the first three bathymetric strata (Table 1), all data analysis refers to this bathymetric interval. An experimental sampling gear with a cod-end mesh size of 20 mm was used. The fishing speed was 3 knots. The horizontal and vertical openings of the net (on average 18.4 and 1.90 m, respectively) were measured using a SCAMMAR system.
Table 1

Distribution of the number of hauls for each survey and depth stratum

Depth stratum (m)

Survey

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

0–50

3

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

51–100

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

101–200

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

Each sampled specimen was measured (total length: TL, mm), weighted (total weight: TW, g) and dissected in order to expose the internal body cavity for a macroscopic (i.e. by naked eye) evaluation of sex (females, males and unsexed juveniles). Specimens were classified in four macroscopic maturity stages as follows: first—immature, second—maturing, third—mature and fourth—spent (Bertrand et al. 1999). Given the low incidence of transitional hermaphroditic stage, these specimens were excluded from further analyses.

Mean Density Index (DI; N/km−2) and Biomass Index (BI; kg/km−2) were estimated (for each stratum and overall area) according to the swept-area principle (Gunderson 1993). Frequency of occurrence (f) was also computed as percentage of positive hauls (presence of at least 1 specimen). The temporal correlation in DI and BI was evaluated (p < 0.05) by computing the Spearman nonparametric rank coefficient (r s). Data were tested for normality and homogeneity of variance with Shapiro–Wilk and Levene’s tests, respectively. As a consequence of the non-normality of the DI and BI data sets even after log-transformation, the Kruskal–Wallis test was applied to compare the median values of DI and BI between depth strata (Sokal and Rohlf 1995).

The spatial analysis of the common pandora distribution was performed using geostatistical methods. Single hauls data were used to generate annual distribution maps of DI through the deterministic technique, inverse distance weighting (IDW) (Isaaks and Srivastava 1989).

Density hot spots were outlined on the annual maps using a threshold calculated on the basis of the cumulative distribution of the DIs. The DIs per haul were sorted in descending order, a cumulative-frequency distribution computed, and the percentile values of the series estimated. The density corresponding to the third quartile of this distribution, i.e. encompassing 75 % of the cumulative density, was selected as the cut-off value to identify the density hot spots (Fiorentino et al. 2003; Garofalo et al. 2011).

To assess the spatiotemporal stability of the density hot spots, a persistence index (PI; Garofalo et al. 2011) was calculated by overlapping the maps of the whole time series and counting, on a cell-by-cell basis (1 km × 1 km), the number of times a given area was classified as an annual density hot spot. This index was obtained as a ratio of the number of times a given area was classified as a hot spot to the total number of years. The PI ranged between 0 and 1, with 0 indicating “hot spots absence” and 1 indicating “stable hot spot”. A minimum threshold of 0.6 was considered to define persistent density hot spots (PI ≥ 0.60).

The relationship between fish length and depth was also investigated. Minimum, maximum and median lengths were calculated by depth interval (50 m each) and graphically represented by box plots. To test the correlation between median length and depth, the Spearman’s rank correlation method was applied.

The sex ratio (Sr), overall and by length class (10 mm), was defined as the proportion of females on the total sexed individuals. The potential difference between observed and expected Sr (0.5) was evaluated with a χ 2 test.

Maturity structure was analysed using the box plot representation approach (medians by maturity stages) separately for females and males. The size at the onset of sexual maturity (TL at which 50 % of the individuals are mature), herein defined as L m, was derived according to the logistic approach:
$$p_{\text{ak}} = \frac{1}{{1 + \exp - g * \left( {L_{\text{k}} - L_{\text{m}} } \right)}}$$
where p ak represents the proportion of the mature specimens (from second to fourth stage) in length class intervals L k (10 mm), and g is the steepness parameter of the maturity curve (Lysack 1980).

The relationship between fish TL and total weight was calculated for females, males and the sexes combined. Weights and TLs data were log-transformed; the linear relationship fitted by least square regression was used to calculate the coefficients a and b. The linear regression assumptions were checked by performing the analysis of residuals; the departure from the isometric condition (H 0: b = 3) was tested by Student’s t test, and differences between sexes were tested by an analysis of covariance (Sokal and Rohlf 1995). All the statistic analyses were performed in the Mystat software (Wong 1989).

Length frequency distributions (LFDs) for each year were computed. LFDs were resolved into Gaussian components with Bhattacharya’s method implemented in the software package FISAT II (Gayanilo et al. 2005). The von Bertalanffy growth model was fitted after having assembled a series of length-at-age data assigning a putative age (years) at each group on the base of an overall interpretation of the life cycle. To compare performance of the stocks, the phi-prime index (Φ′) was calculated (Pauly and Munro 1984), thus overcoming the problem of the correlation between k and L .

Results

A total of 2,166 (482 males, 1,664 females, 8 hermaphrodites and 12 undetermined) P. erythrinus were sampled, ranging in length from 55 to 480 mm.

Species showed a marked preference for the upper continental shelf with the highest abundance observed between 10 and 50 m (f = 97 %, DI = 530, BI = 64). The difference of DI and BI values between depth strata was significant (H = 28.29 and p < 0.01 for DI; H = 27.48 and p < 0.01 for BI). The temporal changes of the overall mean DI showed a significant negative trend (r s = −0.55 and p < 0.05; Table 2). No temporal trend of BI values was observed (r s = −0.48 and p > 0.05) (Table 3).
Table 2

Density index (N/km2), standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV) and frequency of occurrence (f) of P. erythrinus by stratum and in the overall bathymetric range for each survey

Depth

Density index (N/km2)

Survey

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

10–50 m

Mean

140

412

626

445

443

446

183

1028

1378

1605

388

239

371

159

94

SD

7

125

239

138

139

104

37

325

487

499

34

26

9

27

12

CV %

5

30

38

31

31

23

20

32

35

31

9

11

2

17

12

f

100

100

75

75

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

51–100 m

Mean

777

232

376

665

235

295

489

456

361

194

63

264

134

299

120

SD

227

91

158

236

93

99

158

152

83

49

8

106

28

115

6

CV %

29

39

42

35

39

34

32

33

23

25

12

40

21

38

5

f

50

50

25

50

50

100

100

100

100

100

100

33

67

67

100

101–200 m

Mean

67

140

0

0

45

19

64

35

0

0

0

15

27

11

12

SD

36

68

0

0

20

11

18

14

0

0

0

6

10

4

6

CV %

54

49

0

0

44

58

27

41

0

0

0

38

36

34

50

f

33

67

0

0

50

17

67

50

0

0

0

40

40

40

20

10–200 m

Mean

278

240

272

304

205

204

214

420

452

449

114

142

144

128

64

SD

134

89

149

146

89

81

88

195

255

274

40

56

36

60

13

CV %

48

37

55

48

43

40

41

46

56

61

35

40

25

47

21

f

54

71

29

36

64

64

86

79

55

55

55

55

64

64

64

Table 3

Biomass index (kg/km2), standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) of P. erythrinus by depth and in the overall bathymetric range for each survey

Depth

Biomass index (kg/km2)

Survey

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

10–50 m

Mean

6.2

24.3

65.9

56.7

25.0

29.2

69.4

96.2

210.4

268.0

31.3

20.0

27.3

13.3

20.3

SD

0.2

7.8

26.4

20.1

6.8

7.0

21.2

35.0

74.9

80.2

2.6

3.2

2.5

2.5

5.9

CV %

3.7

32.3

40.2

35.4

27.3

23.9

30.6

36.3

35.6

29.9

8.4

15.9

9.1

19.1

29.1

51–100 m

Mean

63.8

24.7

48.3

73.2

31.7

36.6

55.0

64.6

50.3

9.9

5.9

38.0

13.4

24.5

10.5

SD

17.9

10.4

20.2

26.4

12.7

13.2

18.7

23.9

15.7

2.8

0.2

15.3

3.3

9.5

0.8

CV %

28.1

42.1

41.9

36.1

40.0

36.1

34.0

37.0

31.2

28.5

3.0

40.3

24.7

38.9

7.7

101–200 m

Mean

5.7

15.3

0.0

0.0

5.7

2.7

6.6

4.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

1.2

4.0

1.3

1.4

SD

3.1

7.4

0.0

0.0

2.5

1.6

1.8

1.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.5

1.6

0.6

0.7

CV %

53.4

48.3

0.0

0.0

43.9

57.7

27.7

29.9

0.0

0.0

0.0

40.6

38.9

42.7

50.2

10–200 m

Mean

21.8

20.4

31.1

35.6

18.2

18.8

36.9

45.9

67.7

68.8

9.4

16.4

12.5

10.7

8.8

SD

10.8

7.8

17.2

17.5

7.5

8.0

15.0

22.2

39.3

44.8

3.2

7.9

3.0

5.0

3.3

CV %

49.5

38.3

55.5

49.3

41.5

42.8

40.7

48.3

58.1

65.0

33.6

48.2

24.4

46.6

37.1

Pagellus erythrinus was distributed widely in the study area. Its most persistent grounds in the southern Tyrrhenian Sea are shown in Fig. 2. Persistent grounds (PI > 0.6) were identified along the northern Sicilian coasts: one area was located in the Castellammare Gulf and another one included the Patti Gulf and immediately adjacent areas.
Fig. 2

Spatial distribution of persistent (PI > 0.6) grounds of Pagellus erythrinus in the southern Tyrrhenian Sea

The box plot representation of size at different depth (Fig. 3) showed a decrease of size range from 50 to 150 depth stratum, followed by a slight increase in 200 m depth stratum. However, median sizes were very similar along the depth classes; in fact, the comparison of median size versus depth confirmed the lack of any significant depth-size effect (r s = 0.63 and p > 0.05).
Fig. 3

Box plot presentation of the overall total length (all years combined) of P. erythrinus by depth interval; TL (minimum, maximum, median, upper and lower quartiles); number of specimens (in brackets)

Total length of females ranged between 100 and 460 mm and TL of males between 90 and 480 mm. The overall average sex ratio was 0.78, ranging between 0.60 and 0.96 (Table 4). The results of χ 2 tests revealed significant differences (p < 0.01) between expected (0.5) and recorded values of Sr in all years. Moreover, females predominated in length classes between 110 and 240 mm TL (χ 2 from 9.8 to 137.6; p < 0.05) and males predominated in the length class 350 mm TL (χ 2 = 18; p < 0.05) (Fig. 4). The statistical analysis showed a significant correlation between size class on Sr (r s = −0.49, p < 0.01).
Table 4

Sex ratio (Sr) evolution by time for P. erythrinus, and corresponding χ 2 test results

Parameter

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Total

No. females

135

141

132

167

117

131

99

222

152

130

46

56

53

49

28

1658

No. males

25

18

42

28

14

6

40

47

76

86

14

23

18

21

4

462

Mean (Sr)

0.84

0.89

0.76

0.86

0.89

0.96

0.71

0.83

0.67

0.60

0.77

0.71

0.75

0.70

0.88

0.78

Variance (Sr)

0.03

0.03

0.03

0.03

0.03

0.02

0.04

0.02

0.03

0.03

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.06

0.01

χ 2 value

74.26

93.61

45.52

97.66

79.42

112.23

24.20

112.55

24.67

8.56

16.02

12.96

16.28

10.41

16.53

674.72

χ 2 significance

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

** Statistic significant χ 2 (at p < 0.01)

Fig. 4

Frequency (%) of females (F), males (M) and unsexed juveniles (I) of P. erythrinus in different length classes. TL total length. The number of specimens for each length class are given above the bars

The box plot representation of size at different macroscopic maturity stages shows that in adult stages (second to fourth stage), the medians of TL were rather similar among each other, but higher than in the first stage (Fig. 5). A slight difference was detected between the sexes, both for adult stages (males 240–275 mm and females 190–230 mm) and juveniles (males 160 mm and females 140 mm). The TL at which 50 % of the individuals were mature (size at maturity, L m) was 157 and 170 mm for females and males, respectively. The logistic fit was quite satisfactory for the mature proportion in both sexes (Fig. 6).
Fig. 5

Box plot presentation of the overall total length (years combined) of P. erythrinus by maturity stage for females and males. Asterisks indicate outliers

Fig. 6

Overall (years combined) proportions of mature specimens by size class for P. erythrinus males and females with logistic fits and corresponding estimated coefficients. Solid and empty dots denote males and females, respectively

Pagellus erythrinus females showed a significant negative allometry (b < 3; Table 5). Slight but highly significant differences were detected between males and females (p < 0.01), i.e. males had a higher weight than females of similar length. The length–weight relationship for all individuals was described by the following parameters: a = 0.016 and b = 2.905.
Table 5

Length–weight relationship of P. erythrinus in the southern Tyrrhenian Sea

 

N

TL range (mm)

a

b

SE (b)

R 2

t test

ANCOVA

Females

257

120–295

0.016

2.901

0.031

0.674

**

**

Males

47

130–320

0.013

2.965

0.055

0.684

ns

 

All samples

304

120–320

0.016

2.905

0.027

0.676

**

 

N number of specimens, TL total length; a intercept, b slope (allometry coefficient), SE standard error, R 2 determination coefficient, t test probability of Student’s t test for isometry (H 0: b = 3), ANCOVA analysis of covariance for sex-related differences; significance level: ns not significant, ** <0.01

The TL of the specimens ranged from 55 to 480 mm (Fig. 7). Length frequency distribution shape showed multiple overlapping modes and a prevalence of medium size specimens. Implementing the FISAT procedures, the Bhattacharya analysis allowed the identification of up to 8 modal groups. Hence, the von Bertalanffy growth function (sexes combined) was chosen, resulting in estimations of TL = 454 mm, K = 0.08 and t 0 = −2.57 (Fig. 8).
Fig. 7

Length frequency distributions of P. erythrinus by survey; class width 10 mm

Fig. 8

von Bertalanffy growth curve for P. erythrinus

Discussion

The results support previous reports on the distribution pattern of the Mediterranean populations of P. erythrinus: the species is abundant between 10 and 100 m and occasional between 100 and 200 m (Santos et al. 1995; Spedicato et al. 2002). P. erythrinus is an important component of the upper shelf fish assemblage in the western Mediterranean Sea (Biagi et al. 2002; Gaertner et al. 2005) and specifically also in the southern Tyrrhenian Sea where the species is typical of the demersal fish community as deep as 100 m (Busalacchi et al. 2010).

Evidences of a differential distribution of fishing effort in the study area have been reported recently. The ground from Cape San Vito to Cape Gallo is characterized by high values of fishing intensity, compared with medium values in the central area from Cape Gallo to Cape Calavà and lowest values in the eastern area from Cape Calavà to Cape Suvero (Mangano et al. 2013, 2014).

The presence of density hot spots in the Patti and Castellammare Gulfs is related with the trawl ban for these areas. The highest values of persistence are reported for the Gulf of Patti, where protection measures are more extended in terms of surface and bathymetric range (from 10 to 500 m depth) than in the Gulf of Castellammare (200 m). Moreover, the common pandora has a depth distribution, which is completely located within the banned area.

Pagellus erythrinus is one of the species directly influenced by the presence of reserve areas: Stelzenmϋller et al. (2007) reported that both catch per unit effort (CPUE) and length of the common pandora increased near to the Medes Islands Integral Reserve in Spain (north-western Mediterranean).

After the ban (1990), a fivefold and a twofold biomass increase have been reported for the common pandora in the Gulfs of Castellammare and Patti, respectively (Pipitone et al. 2000; Rinelli et al. 2004; Potoschi et al. 2006). Our results confirm the positive effect of protective measures on the abundance of the common pandora in the two Fishery Exclusion Zones. The presence of hot spots in the areas immediately adjacent to the “no take areas” may result from spillover due to the species’ moderate mobility (Stelzenmϋller et al. 2007).

The sex ratio was unbalanced in favour of females, which is in accordance with the results reported for Mediterranean and Atlantic populations (Vassilopoulou et al. 1986; Pajuelo and Lorenzo 1998). The presence of small-sized males (primary males) and large females in our samples suggests that sex change does not occur in each individual.

The low incidence of non-functional intersex in our samples may be correlated with several factors. First of all, sex identification was based only on macroscopic gonad examination. Consequently, the relative percentage of transitional individuals may be underestimated as gonads have not been analysed histologically. Moreover, our samplings have been carried out with an annual periodicity. In the Mediterranean Sea, the common pandora generally spawns in spring/summer (Tsikliras et al. 2010), a second spawning period in autumn has been reported by some authors (Dieuzeide et al. 1955; Ghorbel and Ktari 1982; Vassilopoulou and Papaconstantinou 1990). Discordant opinions regard the time of sex reversal: it has been reported to occur during the prespawning, spawning or postspawning season in different studies (D’Ancona 1949; Larrañeta 1953; Zei and Zupanovio 1961). Therefore, the low number of transitional hermaphroditic stage may be due to the short sampling period.

Finally, a high degree of variability related to sexual differentiation within the species (protogynous hermaphroditism ranging from 9 to 100 %) has been reported by several authors (D’Ancona 1949; Larrañeta 1964; Ghorbel and Ktari 1982; Valdés et al. 2004) as well as an high incidence of gonochorism (Larrañeta 1964; Ghorbel and Ktari 1982; Valdés et al. 2004).

The L m values reported in this study (157 mm for females and 170 mm for males) are intermediate between those obtained by other authors, ranging from 113 to 180 mm for females and from 151 to 232 mm for males (Hashem and Gassim 1981; Santos et al. 1995; Pajuelo and Lorenzo 1998; Metín et al. 2011). The minimum size regulation of 150 mm TL adopted within the European Union Common Fisheries Policy (EU Regulation 1967/2006) for the common pandora is of limited benefit, because this value almost corresponds to the length at first maturity of females and is even smaller than the length at first maturity of males.

The length–weight relationship of P. erythrinus (sexes combined) shows a negative allometry, which is in accordance with results of previous studies (Hashem and Gassim 1981; Livadas 1989; Santos et al. 1995; Moutopoulos and Stergiou 2002; Hoşsucu and Çakır 2003; Metín et al. 2011; Fiorentino et al. 2012). Moreover, males show a higher allometry coefficient than females. Similar results have been reported by Pajuelo and Lorenzo (1998) for the Atlantic waters. However, females with a higher allometry coefficient than males have also been reported (Metín et al. 2011).

The asymptotic length (L ) was determined as 454 mm TL, which is close to the size of the largest fish examined (480 TL male). The growth coefficient value (k = 0.08 year−1) indicates that growth was lower than reported by other authors except for Mytilineou (1989). The growth performance index (Φ′ = 2.22) falls between the estimates reported for different Mediterranean areas (1.96–2.62) and is similar to the estimates reported for the eastern Atlantic (2.25–2.54) (Table 6). No geographical trend was detectable.
Table 6

Parameters of the von Bertalanffy growth function for P. erythrinus in different areas

L (mm)

K/year

−t 0

Φ

Area

References

300

0.20

na

2.25

Sea of Cyprus

Livadas (1989)

401

0.17

0.75

2.44

South Levant Sea

El-Haweet et al. (2011)

334

0.37

0.23

2.62

South Levant Sea

Mehanna (2011)

240

0.16

2.60

1.96

Edremit Bay

Hoşsucu and Çakır (2003)

357

0.10

2.37

2.10

Gülbahçe Bay

Tosunoğlu et al. (1997)

482

0.06

na

2.14

Aegean Sea

Mytilenou (1989)

278

0.32

0.74

2.40

Cretan Shelf

Somarakis and Machias (2002)

326

0.18

na

2.28

Off Western Greece

Papaconstantinou et al. (1988)

379

0.20

na

2.46

Adriatic Sea

Juckic and Piccinetti (1981)

367

0.16

1.24

2.33

Sicilian Channel

Andaloro and Giarritta (1985)

400

0.18

1.00

2.45

Sicilian Channel

Fiorentino et al. (2012)

454

0.08

2.57

2.22

Southern Tyrrhenian Sea

Present study

543

0.12

1.12

2.54

Northern Tyrrhenian Sea

Abella et al. (2010)

345

0.33

na

2.59

Gulf of Lyon

Girardin and Quignard (1985)

517

0.14

1.12

2.57

Balearic Sea

Larrañeta (1967)

471

0.08

4.42

2.25

Off South Portugal

Erzini et al. (2001)

418

0.20

0.55

2.54

Off Canary Islands

Pajuelo and Lorenzo (1998)

L theoretical maximum (asymptotic) total length; K growth coefficient; −t 0 theoretical age at zero length; Φ′ growth performance index; na not available

Considering the over-exploitation status of almost all Mediterranean demersal resources (Leonart and Maynou 2003), our results support the general idea that the protective measures as FEZ (Fisheries Exclusion Zone) can contribute to enhance fish stocks. This is essential especially in an area such as the southern Tyrrhenian Sea, which is characterized by a high level of exploitation (Mangano et al. 2013, 2014).

Notes

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute for Coastal Marine Environment (IAMC), National Research Council (CNR)

References

  1. Abella A, Colloca F, Sartor P, Mannini A (2010) General fisheries commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM). SAC SCSA. WG on Stock Assessment of Demersal Species. Stock Assessment FormsGoogle Scholar
  2. Abellán E, Basurco B (1999) Marine finfish species diversification: current situation and prospects in mediterranean aquaculture. In: Abellán E, Basurco B (eds) Marine finfish species diversification: current situation and prospects in mediterranean aquaculture. CIHEAM-IAMZ (Options Méditerranéennes: Série B. Etudes et Recherches; n 24). ZaragozaGoogle Scholar
  3. Andaloro F, Giarritta S (1985) Contribution to the knowledge of the age, growth and feeding of pandora, Pagellus erythrinus (L, 1758) in the Sicilian Channel. FAO Fish Rep 336:85–87Google Scholar
  4. Ardizzone GD, Messina A (1983) Feeding habits of Pagellus erythrinus (L.) (Pisces, Sparidae) from the middle Tyrrhenian Sea. Rapp Comm Int Expl Sci Mer Médit 28:39–42Google Scholar
  5. Bauchot ML, Hureau JC (1986) Sparidae. In: Whitehead PJP, Bauchot ML, Hureau JC, Nielsen J, Tortonese E (eds) Fishes of the north-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Unesco, Paris, pp 883–907Google Scholar
  6. Bertrand J, Gil de Sola L, Souplet A, Relini G, Papaconstantinou C (1999) Campagnes internationales de chalutage de fond en Méditerranée (MEDITS). In: Ifremer (ed) International bottom trawl surveys in the Mediterranean. Manuel des protocoles-Handbook. NantesGoogle Scholar
  7. Biagi F, Sartor P, Ardizzone G, Belcari P, Belluscio A, Serena F (2002) Analysis of demersal assemblages off the Tuscany and Latium coasts (north-western Mediterranean). Sci Mar 66:233–242. doi:10.3989/scimar.2002.66s2233 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Busalacchi B, Rinelli P, De Domenico F, Profeta A, Perdichizzi F, Bottari T (2010) Analysis of demersal fish assemblages off the southern Tyrrhenian Sea (central Mediterranean). Hydrobiologia 654:111–124. doi:10.1007/s10750-010-0374-9 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Coelho R, Bentes L, Correia C, Gonçalves JMS, Lino PG, Monteiro P, Ribeiro J, Erzini K (2010) Life history of the common pandora, Pagellus erythrinus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Actinopterygii: sparidae) from southern Portugal. Braz J Oceanogr 58:233–245. doi:10.1590/S1679-87592010000300006 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. D’Ancona U (1949) Il differenziamento della gonade e l’inversione sessuale degli Sparidi. Archivio di Oceanografia e Limnologia IV:97–163Google Scholar
  11. Dieuzeide R, Novella M, Roland J (1955) Catalogue des poissons des côtes algériennes. Bull Sta Aquic Pêch Castiglione 6:384Google Scholar
  12. EC (2006) Council Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006 of 21 December 2006 concerning management measures for the sustainable exploitation of fishery resources in the Mediterranean Sea, amending Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1626/94. Off J Eur Union L 409:11–85Google Scholar
  13. El-Haweet AAK, El-Ganiny AA, Mahmoud HH (2011) General fisheries commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM). SAC SCSA. WG on Stock Assessment of Demersal Species. Stock Assessment FormsGoogle Scholar
  14. Erzini K, Gonçalves JMS, Bentes L, Lino PG, Ribeiro J (1998) Species and size selectivity in a “red” sea bream longline “metier” in the Algarve (southern Portugal). Aquat Living Resour 11:1–11. doi:10.1016/S0990-7440(99)80025-4 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Erzini K, Bentes L, Coelho R, Correia C, Lino PG, Monteiro P, Ribeiro J, Gonçalves J (2001) Fisheries biology and assessment of demersal species (Sparidae) from the South of Portugal. Final report, Universidade do AlgarveGoogle Scholar
  16. Fiorentino F, Garofalo G, De Santi A, Bono G, Giusto GB, Norrito G (2003) Spatio-temporal distribution of recruits (0 group) of Merluccius merluccius and Phycis blennoides (Pisces, Gadiformes) in the Strait of Sicily (Central Mediterranean). Hydrobiologia 503:223–236View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Fiorentino F, Knittweis L, Gancitano V, Mifsud R, Gravino F, Gristina M (2012) General fisheries commission for the mediterranean (GFCM). Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC). Report of the 14th of the Working Group on Stock Assessment of Demersal Species, Chania (Crete), Greece, 24–29 October 2011Google Scholar
  18. Froese R, Pauly D (2014) Pagellus erythrinus. FishBase Editors World Wide Web electronic publication. http://www.fishbase.org/summary/Pagellus-erythrinus.html. Accessed 20 Feb 2014
  19. Gaertner JC, Bertrand J, Samanis D, Souplet A (2005) Spatio-temporal organization patterns of demersal assemblages of the east of Corsica (Mediterranean Sea). Vie Milieu 55:81–89Google Scholar
  20. Garofalo G, Fortibuoni T, Gristina M, Sinopoli M, Fiorentino F (2011) Persistence and co-occurrence of demersal nurseries in the Strait of Sicily (central Mediterranean): implications for fishery management. J Sea Res 66:29–38View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Gayanilo FC Jr, Sparre P, Pauly D (2005) The FAO-ICLARM stock assessment tools II (FiSAT) user’s guide. FAO, Computer Programme, RomeGoogle Scholar
  22. Ghorbel M, Ktari MH (1982) Etude préliminaire de la reproduction de Pagellus erythrinus des eaux tunisiennes. Bull Inst Natl Sci Tech Oceanogr Peche Salammbo 9:23–38Google Scholar
  23. Giacalone VM, D’Anna G, Badalamenti F, Pipitone C (2010) Weight–length relationships and condition factor trends for thirty-eight fish species in trawled and untrawled areas off the coast of northern Sicily (central Mediterranean Sea). J Appl Ichthyol 26:954–957. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0426.2010.01491.x View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Girardin M, Quignard JP (1985) Croissance de Pagellus erythrinus (pisces: teleosteens sparidae) dans le Golfe du Lion. Cybium 9:359–374Google Scholar
  25. Gunderson DR (1993) Survey of fisheries resources. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Gurbet R, Akyol O, Yalcin E (2012) Catch per unit effort and mortality rates of two sparid species, Pagellus acarne and Pagellus erythrinus from bottom trawl fishery in Izmir Bay, Aegean Sea. J Anim Vet Adv 11:681–686. doi:10.3923/javaa.2012.681.686 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Hashem MT, Gassim AS (1981) Some aspects of the fishery biology of Pagellus erythrinus (L) in the Libyan waters. Bull Inst Oceanogr Fish ARE 7:429–441Google Scholar
  28. Hoşsucu B, Çakır DT (2003) Some parameters about population biology of the common pandora (Pagellus erythrinus L. 1758) (Sparidae) in the Edremit Bay (Turkey). EU J Fish Aquat Sci 20:236–329Google Scholar
  29. Isaaks ES, Srivastava RM (1989) An Introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Jarboui O, Ghorbel A, Bouain A (1998) Stock of common pandora (Pagellus erythrinus) in the Gabes Gulf (Tunisia): fishing situation and management possibilities. Cah Opt Médit 35:251–260Google Scholar
  31. Juckic S, Piccinetti C (1981) GFCM report of the technical consultation on stock assessment on the Adriatic. FAO Fish Rep 253:186Google Scholar
  32. Larrañeta MG (1953) Observaciones sobre la sexualidad de Pagellus erythrinus, L. Publ Inst Biol Apl Barcelona 13:83–101Google Scholar
  33. Larrañeta MG (1964) Sobre la biologia de Pagellus erythrinus de las costas del Castellon. Invest Pesq 27:185–258Google Scholar
  34. Larrañeta MG (1967) Crescimiento de Pagellus erythrinus de las costas de Castellón. Invest Pesq 31:121–146Google Scholar
  35. Leonart J, Maynou F (2003) Fish stock assessments in the Mediterranean-state of the art. Sci Mar 67(suppl 1):37–49Google Scholar
  36. Livadas RJ (1989) A study of the biology and population dynamics of pandora (Pagellus erythrinus L., 1758), family Sparidae, in the Seas of Cyprus. FAO Fish Rep 412:58–75Google Scholar
  37. Lysack W (1980) 1979 Lake Winnipeg fish stock assessment program. MS Report No. 30, Manitoba Department of Natural Resources, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  38. Mangano MC, Kaiser MJ, Porporato EMD, Spanò N (2013) Evidence of trawl disturbance on mega-epibenthic communities in the southern Tyrrhenian Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 475:101–117. doi:10.3354/meps10115 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Mangano MC, Kaiser MJ, Porporato EMD, Lambert GI, Rinelli P, Spanò N (2014) Infaunal community responses to a gradient of trawling disturbance and a long-term Fishery Exclusion Zone in the Southern Tyrrhenian Sea. Cont Shelf Res 76:25–35. doi:10.1016/j.csr.2013.12.014 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Mehanna S (2011) General fisheries commission for the mediterranean (GFCM). Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC). Report of the 13th of the SCSA Working Group on Stock Assessment of Demersal Species. Istanbul, Turkey, 18–23 October 2010, pp 38–39Google Scholar
  41. Metín G, İlkyaz AT, Soykan O, Kinacigil HT (2011) Biological characteristics of the common pandora, Pagellus erythrinus (Linnaus, 1758), in the central Aegean Sea. Turk J Zool 35:307–315. doi:10.3906/zoo-0904-4 Google Scholar
  42. Moutopoulos DK, Stergiou KI (2002) Length–weight and length–length relationships of fish species from the Aegean Sea (Greece). J Appl Ichthyol 18:200–203. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0426.2002.00281.x View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Mytilineou C (1989) Données biologiques sur le pageot, Pagellus erythrinus, des côtes orientales de la Grèce centrale. FAO Fish Rep 412:77–82Google Scholar
  44. Onlus IREPA (2011) Osservatorio economico sulle strutture produttive della pesca marittima in Italia 2010. Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, NapoliGoogle Scholar
  45. Pajuelo JG, Lorenzo JM (1998) Population biology of the common pandora Pagellus erythrinus (Pisces: sparidae) off the Canary Islands. Fish Res 36:75–86View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Papaconstantinou C, Mytilineou C, Panos T (1988) Aspects of the life history and fishery of red pandora Pagellus erythrinus (Sparidae) off Western Greece. Cybium 13:159–167Google Scholar
  47. Pauly D, Munro JL (1984) Once more the comparison of growth in fish and invertebrates. ICLARM Fishbyte 2Google Scholar
  48. Pipitone C, Badalamenti F, D’Anna G, Patti B (2000) Fish biomass increase after a four-year trawl ban in the Gulf of Castellammare (NW Sicily, Mediterranean Sea). Fish Res 48:23–30. doi:10.1016/S0165-7836(00)00114-4 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Potoschi A, Battaglia P, Rinelli P, Perdichizzi F, Manganaro A, Greco S (2006) Variazione dei rendimenti con rete a strascico in un’area a parziale protezione nel Golfo di Patti (Sicilia Settentrionale) in 20 anni di monitoraggio. Biol Mar Medit 13:149–157Google Scholar
  50. Relini G, Bertrand J, Zamboni A, Eds (1999) Synthesis of the knowledge on bottom fishery resources in Central Mediterranean, Italy and Corsica. Biol Mar Medit 6(suppl 1):427–433Google Scholar
  51. Relini G, Carpentieri P, Murenu M (2008) Medits instruction manual version 5 rev. Biol Mar Medit 15Google Scholar
  52. Rinelli P, Ragonese S, Consoli P, Florio G, Romeo T, Perdichizzi F, Greco S (2004) Monitoring no-taken areas: the cases of the gulfs of Castellammare and Patti (northern coasts of Sicily). Biol Mar Medit 11:82–87Google Scholar
  53. Šantić M, Paladin A, Rađa B (2011) Feeding habits of common pandora Pagellus erythrinus (Sparidae) from eastern central Adriatic Sea. Cybium 35:83–90Google Scholar
  54. Santos MN, Monteiro CC, Erzini K (1995) Aspects of the biology and gillnet selectivity of the axillary seabream (Pagellus acarne, Risso) and common pandora (Pagellus erythrinus, Linnaeus) from the Algarve (South Portugal). Fish Res 23:223–236View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. Freeman and Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Somarakis S, Machias A (2002) Age, growth and bathymetric distribution of red pandora (Pagellus erythrinus) on the Cretan shelf (eastern Mediterranean). J Mar Biol Ass UK 82:149–160. doi:10.1017/S002531540200526X View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Spedicato MT, Greco S, Sophronidis K, Lembo G, Giordano D, Argyri A (2002) Geographical distribution, abundance and some population characteristics of the species of the genus Pagellus (Osteichthyes: Perciformes) in different areas of Mediterranean. Sci Mar 66:65–82. doi:10.3989/scimar.2002.66s265 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Stelzenmϋller V, Maynou F, Martín P (2007) Spatial assessment of benefits of a coastal Mediterranean Marine Protected Area. Biol Conserv 136:571–583. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.01.002 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Tosunoğlu Z, Akyol O, Metin G, Tokaç A, Üsal S (1997) The study on the population characteristics of three sparid species in the Gülbahçe Bay. EU J Fish Aqua Sci 14:127–143Google Scholar
  60. Tsikliras AC, Antonopoulou E, Stergiou KI (2010) Spawning period of Mediterranean marine fishes. Rev Fish Biol Fish 20(4):499–538. doi:10.1007/s11160-010-9158-6 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Valdés P, García-Alcázar I, Abdel M, Arizcun M, Suárez C, Abellán E (2004) Seasonal changes on gonadosomatic index and maturation stages in common pandora Pagellus erythrinus (L.). Aquacult Int 12:333–343. doi:10.1023/B:AQUI.0000042136.91952.9e View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Vassilopoulou V, Papaconstantinou C (1990) Growth in weight, condition factor and reproductive cycle of red pandora Pagellus erythrinus in the Saronicos Gulf. In: Proceedings of 3rd Hell symposium on Oceanogr Fish, Athens, vol 3, pp 584–591Google Scholar
  63. Vassilopoulou V, Mytilineou C, Papaconstantinou C (1986) Preliminary biological data on the red pandora (Pagellus erythrinus L., 1758) in the Greek seas. FAO Fish Rep 361:107–112Google Scholar
  64. Wong ND (1989) Mystat: a personal version of Systat. Yale J Biol Med 62:237–238PubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Zei M, Zupanovio S (1961) Contribution to the sexual cycle and sex reversal of Pagellus erythrinus L. P.-verbaux des Réunions Commission Internationale pour l’Exploration Scientifique de la Mer Méditerranée 16:263–267Google Scholar

Copyright

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and AWI 2014

Advertisement