Protection against suspended sand: the function of the branchial membrane in the blue mussel Mytilus edulis
© Springer-Verlag and AWI 2006
Received: 17 May 2005
Accepted: 3 January 2006
Published: 7 February 2006
Blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) living in estuaries have to cope with varying concentrations of suspended sand. Sand flowing through the inhalant siphons comes into the infrabranchial chamber. The inhalant siphon can be partially closed by the branchial membrane. As a result the inward flow decreases, and suspended sand sinks and can be eliminated. Experiments with mussels from three ecologically different locations showed about the same response of the branchial membrane on contact with suspended sand. The presence and function of the branchial membrane appears to be an adaptation of mussels to their estuarine environment.
In estuaries, strong tidal currents and turbulence caused by high winds bring large amounts of sand in suspension. Blue mussels living there possess mechanisms to eliminate sand from the mantle cavity. Ciliary particle transport on the surface of the visceral mass, the palps and the whole mantle surface has been described (Wallengren 1905; Kellogg 1915). An important ciliary tract runs along the ventral inner surface of the inner mantle lobe, transporting material to the ventral part of the inhalant siphon, whence it is eliminated just below the strong exhalant stream (Dodgson 1928; Orton 1912). Blue mussels in natural banks in estuaries are attached with their ventral side on the substrate. The ciliary tract along the inner fold of the mantle edge is well situated for the elimination of waste particles (Orton 1912). Blue mussels may also have a mechanism to reduce the influx of sand into the mantle cavity. They possess a branchial membrane, situated dorsally in the inhalant siphon. This membrane can be lowered, closing in part the inhalant siphon and directing the inhalant water current into a ventral direction (Dodgson 1928; White 1937). Experiments were carried out to test the hypothesis that the branchial membrane has a function in limiting the influx of sand. Mussels from three different environments were tested: coastal water, Wadden Sea channels and a tidal shallow bay.
Materials and methods
Blue mussels (Mytilus edulis L.) from three different localities were used in the experiments. Sublittoral mussels were obtained by dredging from a depth of 5–6 m at the Doove Balg, Western Dutch Wadden Sea. Littoral mussels were collected by hand on the north shore of the Mok Bay at the lower end of the dike. North sea mussels were collected from the bottom of a buoy about 8 mile W of De Koog, Texel (53°10′57″N, 4°35′19″E); the depth on this location is about 20 m. Only the largest animals were used for the experiments. The mussels were kept in aquaria of about 40 l with running aerated sea water (16°C, 30–32‰) till use. Age of the sublittoral Wadden Sea mussels was between 2 and 3 years, the buoy mussels were maximal 2 years and 4 months old, and the littoral Mok Bay mussels were at least 6–7 years old.
All experimental work was carried out in autumn 2004. Mussels from the Mok Bay were tested in September and October, those from Doove Balg and the North Sea buoy in November and December.
Experiments with sand
Sand was collected on the beach north of the Institute and sieved. Two fractions were used in the experiments: 160–250 and 100–160 μ.
Characteristics of the experimental animals
Live weight, length of the shells and weight of the shells as well as of the flesh were determined. Dry weight of the flesh was determined by drying the samples for 3 days at 60°C.
The proportion and magnitude of branchial membrane responses were compared between locations using a G-test. Differences in condition factors of experimental mussels from different locations were tested by ANOVA analysis and Bonferroni pairwise comparisons.
Response to suspended sand
Responses of the branchial membrane to suspended sand in mussels from three different locations (in parentheses, %)
Origin of mussels
Number of mussels tested
Buoy de Koog
Characteristics of the experimental animals
Condition of mussels of different locations used in the experiments (in parentheses, N)
Origin of mussels
Wet weight (% of live weight)
Shell weight (% of live weight)
Dry weight (% of wet weight)
Shell length (cm)
Buoy De Koog
Molluscs living in estuaries need some adaptation to suspended sand in their environment. However, the only work on this subject has been performed because of the practical value in the desanding of reared mussels (de Vooys 1987; Lui and Leung 2004).
Anatomical descriptions of the branchial membrane of M. edulis were given by Kellogg (1890, 1915), Field (1922), Dodgson (1928) and White (1937). Dodgson (1928) suggested that the branchial membrane (which he called “velum”) could limit the influx of sand into the mantle cavity. Alternatively, the branchial membrane was suggested to decrease filtration by reducing the watermass pumped by the gills (Dardignac-Corbeil 1976). In the experiments described here, responses of the branchial membrane to suspended sand were demonstrated in mussels from all three locations.
The closing of the branchial membrane enables filtration to continue, although at a lower level, during the entire tidal cycle. The presence of a branchial membrane in the mussel is an indication of a good adaptation to living in estuaries.
Mussels on a floating buoy in coastal waters 8 miles (15 km) off the coast are living in an environment with little suspended sand in the water column.
Nevertheless, no difference in the occurrence and magnitude in the response of the branchial membrane was found. The results of this investigation indicate that the function of the branchial membrane does not change according to the particular environment mussels come exposed to.
Other bivalve species living in sandy estuaries do not have a branchial membrane. They probably use other mechanisms to eliminate sand from their infrabranchial chamber. In Macoma balthica, for example, the sand taken in with the food is, from time to time, blown out again by reversing the water current in the inhalant siphon. In Mya arenaria and Cerastoderma edule, a sudden adduction of the shells occurs and the outflow of the water from the infrabranchial chamber eliminates the accumulated sand. However, our knowledge on the adaptation to suspended sand in animals which live in estuaries is still rather incomplete.
The author wishes to thank R.P.D. Aggenbach and G.M. Manshanden for performing the video recordings and editing the video pictures, and Dr J. van der Meer for carrying out the statistical analysis of the results. Also he thanks C.M. Minnes (Ministery of Transport, Public Works and Water Management) and the crew of the m.s. “Phoca” for providing mussels from the coastal buoy and the Western Wadden Sea, respectively.
- Dardignac-Corbeil MJ (1976) La moule. Biologie de l’ huître et de la moule. Rev Trav Inst Pêches Marit 40:315–345Google Scholar
- Dodgson RW (1928) Report on mussel purification. Fish Invest Ser II X(1):154–223Google Scholar
- Field IA (1922) Biology and economic value of the sea mussel Mytilus edulis. Bull US Bur Fish 38:127–259Google Scholar
- Kellogg JL (1890) A contribution to our knowledge of the morphology of the lamellibranchiate molluscs. Bull US Fish Comm 10:389–436Google Scholar
- Kellogg JL (1915) Ciliary mechanisms of lamellibranchs, with descriptions of anatomy. J Morphol 26:625–701View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lui KK, Leung KMY (2004) Sand elimination by the Asiatic hard clam Meretrix meretrix (L.): influences of temperature, salinity and season. J Shellfish Res 23:421–427Google Scholar
- Orton JH (1912) The mode of feeding of Crepidula, with an account of the current-producing mechanism in the mantle cavity, and some remarks on the mode of feeding in gastropods and lamellibranchs. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 9:444–478Google Scholar
- de Vooys CGN (1987) Elimination of sand in the blue mussel Mytilus edulis Neth J Sea Res 21:75–78View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wallengren H (1905) Zur Biologie der Muscheln. II. Die Nahrungsaufnahme. Acta Univ Lund (n.ser.) Afd 2, Bd 1, nr 3:1–59Google Scholar
- White KM (1937) Mytilus. L.M.B.C. Memoirs on typical British marine plants and animals. In: Daniel RJ (ed), no 31Google Scholar