Open Access

Reproduction, population dynamics and production of Nereis falsa (Nereididae: Polychaeta) on the rocky coast of El Kala National Park, Algeria

  • Tarek Daas1,
  • Mourad Younsi1,
  • Ouided Daas-Maamcha1,
  • Patrick Gillet2 and
  • Patrick Scaps3Email author
Helgoland Marine Research201065:212

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10152-010-0212-5

Received: 8 January 2010

Accepted: 2 July 2010

Published: 18 July 2010

Abstract

The polychaete Nereis falsa Quatrefages, 1866 is present in the area of El Kala National Park on the East coast of Algeria. Field investigations were carried out from January to December 2007 to characterize the populations’ reproductive cycle, secondary production and dynamics. Reproduction followed the atokous type, and spawning occured from mid-June to the end of August/early September when sea temperature was highest (20–23°C). The diameter of mature oocytes was approximately 180 μm. Mean lifespan was estimated to about one year. In 2007, the mean density was 11.27 ind. m−2 with a minimum of 7.83 ind. m−2 in April and a maximum of 14.5 ind. m−2 in February. The mean annual biomass was 1.36 g m−2 (fresh weight) with a minimum of 0.86 g m−2 in December and a maximum of 2.00 g m−2 in June. The population consisted of two cohorts distinguishable from size frequency distributions. One cohort corresponded to the recruitment of 2006 and the other appeared during the study period in September 2007. The annual production of N. falsa was 1.45 g m−2 year−1, and the production/biomass ratio was 1.07 year−1.

Keywords

Nereididae Population dynamics Production Reproduction

Introduction

The polychaete Nereis falsa Quatrefages, 1866 has a wide geographical distribution. This species has been recorded along the coast of the Atlantic Ocean [Atlantic coast of Morocco (Fadlaoui and Retière 1995), Namibia (Glassom and Branch 1997) and South Africa (Day 1967), North American Atlantic coast (Posey et al. 2002, 2006), Florida Bay (Vittor 1997a, 1998), north coast of the Gulf of Mexico (Vittor 1984), Galveston Bay in the Gulf of Texas (Vittor 1997b), north-east coast of Venezuela (Arana and Diaz 2006), Colombian Caribbean coast (Baez and Ardila 2003)] and the Mediterranean Sea [Algésiras Bay in Spain (Sanchez-Moyano et al. 2001), Cueta harbour in Morocco (Guerra-Garcia et al. 2003; Guerra-Garcia and Garcia-Gomez 2004), Circeo National Park on the Italian Adriatic coast (Andrea and Giancarlo 2003), Izmir Bay/Turkey (Ertan Çinar et al. 2008), on floating debris in the Liguran Sea (Alliani and Meloni 1999) and on current metre moorings deployed in the Corsica Channel (Alliani and Meloni 1999)]. Moreover, this species lives as epibiont on loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) nesting on the coast of Georgia, USA (Pfaller et al. 2006), and on mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis in Izmir Bay, eastern Mediterranean (Ertan Çinar et al. 2008). The species is a facultative rafter; i.e. it typically lives in benthic habitats but may become dispersed while being associated with floating items (Thiel and Gutow 2005).

A preliminary study of the species’ distribution on the Algerian east coast (between Skikda and El Kala, (Fig. 1) revealed its presence only in the area of El Kala National Park. The reproductive biology and population dynamics of this species are poorly documented. So, this study was conducted to obtain information on the cycle of reproduction, secondary production and dynamics of a population of N. falsa on a rocky shore on the Algerian east coast (Mediterranean Sea). This work is part of a research programme dedicated to the identification of indicator species of pollution on the Algerian east coast (Abdenour et al. 2000, 2004; Bouzeraa et al. 2004; Beldi et al. 2006; Sifi et al. 2007).
Fig. 1

Study area and location of sampling station

Materials and methods

Study site and collection of material

Individuals were collected in the area of El Kala National Park, Algerian east coast. Worms were found among red algae covering hard bottoms. Rocks are metamorphic and are composed of gneiss and quartzite. The maximum tide is small (0.9 m).

Individuals were collected monthly from January to December 2007. The region sampled corresponded with the area of greatest density of individuals. The individuals occur in the lower intertidal zone and extend down into the subtidal. We used bleaching liquid (10% in sea water) to force individuals out of their algal mats in order to obtain undamaged whole individuals. Approximately 6 m2 of hard bottom has been monitored each month in order to collect enough individuals for the population dynamics study.

In our study site, N. falsa coexists with two other species of nereidid polychaetes, Perinereis cultrifera and Platynereis dumerilii. For a correct identification to species level, using the diagnostic patterns of paragnaths on the proboscis, worms were made to evert their proboscis by generating pressure some distance behind the head.

The number of collected specimens varied between 47 in April and 87 in February. A total of 812 worms were collected and examined. At each sampling date, air and sea water temperature were recorded.

Reproduction

For the study of the reproductive cycle, the individuals were fixed in the laboratory with 8% neutral formalin and examined for the presence sexual products in the coelom. A short incision was made in the body wall at about the twentieth chaetigerous segment and a drop (~1 ml) of the coelomic fluid was taken out with a Pasteur pipette and examined under a binocular microscope. If possible, forty oocytes each were measured using a calibrated eye piece graticule. The longest and the shortest diameter of oocytes were determined, and the average value was used as an estimate of oocyte size.

Population dynamics

After species identification, the fresh weight of each individual was measured. Weight frequency histograms were treated by FISAT II FAO software, which is used for the identification of parameters of a mixture of distributions (Gayanilo et al. 2005) and replaces the methods based on the analysis of modes of histograms (Gayanilo et al. 1988; Gayanilo and Pauly 1989). The secondary production (P) was estimated by the method of Crisp (1971) using the equation P = (Nt1 + Nt2)/2(Wt2 − Wt1) with Nt1 and Nt2 representing numbers of individuals in a cohort at times t1 and t2 and Wt1 and Wt2 representing the mean fresh weights of a cohort at times t1 and t2. The secondary production and the production/biomass ratio (P/B) were calculated for the year 2007.

Results

Temperature at the study site (Fig. 2)

During the study period from January to December 2007, air temperature varied between 10°C in December and 34°C in August (average: 21.08 ± 9.40°C). Sea water temperature measured during low tide ranged between 8°C in January and 23°C in August (average: 16.08 ± 5.01°C).
Fig. 2

Monthly sea water and air temperature in the studied area

Reproductive biology

Cœlomic punctures of each female showed a homogeneous aspect with oocyte diameters being appreciably equal. Thus, ovogenesis was considered to be synchronous. The mean oocyte diameter frequency histograms of individuals collected from January to December 2007 are shown in Fig. 3. Most of the histograms are unimodal and can be considered to show a single cohort.
Fig. 3

Size distribution frequency of oocytes between January and December 2007

The study of the changes in average oocyte diameters (Fig. 4) allowed us to reveal the female sexual cycle. The mean oocyte diameter varied between 42.44 ± 11.19 μm in September and 166.27 ± 16.06 μm in August. From January to May, the mean oocyte diameter ranged between 80 and 100 μm. We recorded a steady increase of the mean oocyte diameter from May to July, with maximal mean values of 155 μm. The first mature oocytes (diameter greater than 160 μm) occurred in the cœlomic fluid of females collected in mid-June. From July to August, oocyte growth was weak and the mean oocyte diameter became maximal (166.27 μm). The coelomic fluid of females collected in early August contained a majority of large oocytes (diameter between 120 and 200 μm) (Fig. 3), while the coelomic fluid of females collected in September contained only small oocytes indicating that the spawning period was finished. So, the spawning season begins in mid-June and spreads out until the end of August or early September. From September to December, the mean oocyte diameter ranged between 40 and 60 μm and remained relatively constant. Oocytes took less than one year to develop fully (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

Changes in oocyte size from January to December 2007. Each data point represents mean ± SD of the mean

During the whole study period, we did not find large mature males or females showing morphological modifications characteristic of epitoky. In consequence, individuals seem to reproduce exclusively in the atokous state and neither of sex appears to survive spawning. A comparison of Figs. 2 and 4 shows that spawning occurs when sea water surface temperature is highest (20–23°C).

Population dynamics

The mean density and biomass of N. falsa, at the study site between January and December 2007, were 11.27 ± 2.09 ind. m−2 and 1.36 ± 0.38 g m−2, respectively. From one month to another, N. falsa density and biomass varied considerably (Fig. 5a, b). Nevertheless, the biomass tended to be higher in summer than in winter (Fig. 5b), with the highest value recorded in June (B = 2 g m−2) and the lowest in December (B = 0.86 g m−2).
Fig. 5

Temporal variations in the density (ind. m−2) (a) and in the biomass (fresh weight g m−2) (b) of the studied population of Nereis falsa at El Kala, Algeria

The mean individual fresh weight was maximal during spring and summer (March to August). It decreased at the end of summer (September) and was minimal during autumn and winter (October to February) (Fig. 6), reflecting the mortality of adults and recruitment of juveniles. The temporal variation in biomass is largely explained by the variation in mean individual fresh weight.
Fig. 6

Changes in the mean individual fresh weight from January to December 2007. Each data point represents mean ± standard error of the mean

Recruitment pattern

The weight frequency histograms of N. falsa collected from January to December 2007 are shown in Fig. 7. Two cohorts (C1, C2) can be distinguished. One cohort (C1) could be followed over eight months from January to August 2007. This cohort represents the older (I-group) individuals. Its members showed a progressive increase in mean individual weight from January to August (Fig. 6). During summer, this cohort was well represented by large females with large oocytes ranging from 140 to 190 μm in diameter in August. In September, the mean individual weight decreased, related to the disappearance of the large individuals after reproduction (C1) and the appearance of another cohort (C2). This cohort could be followed for the rest of the sampling period into December. It corresponded to a new generation of individuals (0-group; i.e. individuals hatched during the sampling year) which had just settled in the study area. This cohort was represented by females with small oocytes ranging from 30 to 70 μm in diameter in September. All frequency histograms showed a unimodal distribution (Fig. 7).
Fig. 7

Weight frequency histograms of Nereis falsa at El Kala between January and December 2007

Growth curves (Fig. 8) have been constructed using the means of fresh weight for each cohort shown in Fig. 7. The mean lifespan was estimated to be one year using the appearance and disappearance of modes in the cohort analysis.
Fig. 8

Growth curves of the cohorts of Nereis falsa at El Kala between January and December 2007

Production estimates

Estimates for the production by the two cohorts of N. falsa during the study period are shown in Table 1. The annual secondary production in 2007 was P = 1.45 g m−2 year−1 at a mean annual biomass of B = 1.36 g m−2. Thus, the ratio P/B amounted to 1.07 year−1.
Table 1

Secondary production of the cohorts of the population

Cohort

Wt

Wt2 − Wt1

Nt

Nt1 + Nt2/2

Production (g for 6 m2)

January

0.095

63

February

0.108

0.013

87

75

0.975

March

0.135

0.027

58

72.5

1.957

April

0.130

−0.005

47

52.5

−0.262

May

0.132

0.002

61

54

0.108

June

0.147

0.015

82

71.5

1.072

July

0.165

0.018

70

76

1.368

August

0.149

−0.016

72

71

−1.152

Total C1

    

4.066

September

0.083

0.083

82

41

3.403

October

0.100

0.017

62

72

1.224

November

0.105

0.005

74

68

0.340

December

0.100

−0.005

52

63

−0.315

Total C2

    

4.652

Total

    

8.718

Wt mean weight variation of a cohort between t1 and t2, Wt 1 and Wt 2 mean fresh weights of a cohort at times t1 and t2, Nt number of individuals in a cohort at times t, Nt 1 and Nt 2 numbers of individuals in a cohort at times t1 and t2

Discussion

The reproduction of N. falsa in the El Kala National Park (Mediterranean, eastern Algeria) follows the atokous type. Data on the species’ mode of reproduction are very scarce and based on old and incomplete observations. To our knowledge, the present study is the first providing on the life cycle of N. falsa. Fauvel (1923) stated that the species reproduces in an epitokous state. However, ecological plasticity in the mode of reproduction has been observed for several species of polychaetes and particularly for nereidid polychaetes (see review by Giangrande 1997). For example, individuals of Perinereis cultrifera reproduce with or without the morphological modifications which are characteristic of epitoky depending on geographical origin. This species is particularly interesting since it occupies the same habitat as N. falsa (rocky shores) and is present in our study site. The reproduction of P. cultrifera in the English Channel and the French Atlantic coast is of an epitokous type and has been observed from May to June and sometimes July (Fauvel 1916; Herpin 1925; Fage and Legendre 1927; Durchon 1951; Cazaux 1965; Scaps et al. 1992). In the Arcachon Basin (Cazaux 1965) and on the north coast of Brittany, P. cultrifera (Scaps et al. 1992) has a 3-year lifespan. Along the Atlantic coast of El Jadida (Morocco), the reproduction of P. cultrifera is of an atokous type and spawning occurs from April until the end of May (Rouhi et al. 2008). In the Mediterranean Sea, mature specimens are atokous in Marseille (Peres and Rancurel 1948) and on the west coast of Algerian in the Bay of Algiers (Durchon 1957; Marcel 1962; Rouabah et al. 2008). In the Bay of Algiers, the lifespan of the species probably does not exceed two years and the reproductive period spans most of the year, but reproduction is most intense in spring from March to May (Rouabah et al. 2008). Reproduction of P. cultrifera is of an epitokous type in the Venice lagoon in Italy (Ansaloni et al. 1986), at Salammbô near Tunis (Zghal and Ben Amor 1989) and at Annaba on the east coast of Algeria near the Tunisian border (Rouabah and Scaps 2003a). At Annaba, P. cultrifera has a 3-year lifespan and spawning occurs in late April/early May (Rouabah and Scaps 2003a, b). The existence of two modes of reproduction in this species (atoky and epitoky) led Marcel (1962) and Zghal and Ben Amor (1989) to split the species into two physiologically different subspecies (“races”), while the observations of Scaps et al. (2000), Roubah and Scaps (2003b) and Roubah et al. (2009) indicated that “P. cultrifera” may represent a complex of species.

Our study showed that N. falsa from the coast of El Kala has a synchronous oogenesis. Similar results have been obtained for other species of nereidid polychaetes such as P. cultrifera (Rouabah and Scaps 2003a) and Platynereis dumerilii (Fischer and Dorresteijn 2004). In contrast, Zribi et al. (2007) showed that Perinereis macropus from the Gulf of Gabes (Tunisia) has an asynchronous oogenesis, with the female individual bearing oocytes of quite different diameters.

Data on the reproductive biology of nereidid polychaetes from the east coast of Algeria and the coast of Tunisia are very scarce. Nevertheless, Rouabah and Scaps (2003a) studied the life cycle and population dynamics of P. cultrifera in the area of Annaba, about 30 km west to our study site. It should be noticed that we did not find individuals of N. falsa in the site studied by Roubah and Scaps in (2003a, b), while these two species co-occur on the coast of El Kala.

Nereis falsa has smaller mature oocytes (diameter of 160–210 μm, mean 165 μm) than P. cultrifera (diameter from 220 to, mean 250 μm). The reproductive period of P. cultrifera is short and spawning occurs from the end of April to early May; that of N. falsa is longer with spawning occurring from the end of July to early September. Oogenesis in P.cultrifera takes 16 months, while that in N. falsa takes less than one year. So, these two co-occurring nereids show clear differences in reproductive traits. The reproductive season of P. macropus stretches from March to June in the Gulf of Gabes in Tunisia, and mature oocytes range between 220 and 300 μm in diameter with a mean of 250 μm (Zribi et al. 2007). In contrast to P. cultrifera and P. macropus, which reproduce in spring at rising sea water temperature, N. falsa reproduces in summer when sea water temperature is at its maximum. In our study site, there are three species of nereids co-occurring in the same habitat (N. falsa, P. cultrifera and P. dumerilii) but only the life cycles of N. falsa and P. cultrifera have been investigated in this area. The life cycle of P. dumerilii, well known from some other geographical locations, remains to be studied for the coast of El Kala in order to compare all three species with respect to their reproductive characteristics.

The values of the mean annual biomass (B = 1.36 g m−2 year−1) and the secondary production (P = 1.45 g m−2) of N. falsa at El Kala National Park are among the lowest recorded for polychaetes. The known P/B ratios of polychaete worms range between 0.89 and 4.6 year−1 (Table 2). The P/B ratio value of 1.07 year−1 for the N. falsa population of El Kala is similar to those reported for Owenia fusiformis in the English Channel (0.89 year−1) and Arenicola marina in the North Sea (1.14 year−1) but is lower than those for polychaete worms from North Africa (e.g. P/B = 2.3 year−1 for P. cultrifera on the Atlantic coast of El Jadida, Morocco; Rouhi et al. 2008).
Table 2

Comparison of the production/biomass ratio (P/B) in some species of polychaetous annelids

Family

Species

P/B

Site

Authors

Arenicolidae

Arenicola marina

1.14

Grevelingen estuary, North Sea

Wolff and Wolff (1977)

Nephthyidae

Nephthys hombergii

1.9

Lynher estuary, English Channel

Warwick and Price (1975)

Nereididae

Nereis diversicolor

3.9–4.6

Bou Regreg, Morocco

Gillet (1993)

 

Nereis diversicolor

1.7–1.9

Oued Souss, Morocco

Aït Alla et al. (2006)

 

Nereis falsa

1.07

El Kala, Algeria

Present work

 

Perinereis cultrifera

2.3

El Jadida, Morocco

Rouhi et al. (2008)

Owenidae

Owenia fusiformis

0.89

English channel

Ménard et al. (1989)

Spionidae

Scolelepis squamata

2.0

Morocco

Bayed et al. (2006)

Notes

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratoire de Biologie Animale Appliquée, Département de Biologie, Faculté des Sciences, Université Badji Mokhtar
(2)
Centre d’Etude et de Recherche sur les Ecosystèmes Aquatiques, Institut de Biologie et d’Ecologie Appliquée, UCO
(3)
Laboratoire de Biologie Animale, Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille

References

  1. Abdenour C, Smith BD, Boulakoud MS, Samraoui B, Rainbow PS (2000) Trace metals in marine, brackish and freshwater prawns from north-east Algeria. Hydrobiologia 432:217–227View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Aït Alla A, Gillet P, Deutsch B, Bergayou H, Moukrim A (2006) Respones of Nereis diversicolor (Polychaeta, Nereididae) populations to reduced wastewater discharge in the polluted estuary of oued Souss, bay of Agadir, Morocco. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 70:633–642View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Alliani S, Meloni R (1999) Dispersal strategies of benthic species and water current variability in the Corsica Channel. Scientia Marina 63:137–145View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrea P, Giancarlo MJ (2003) La Fauna del Parco Nazionale del Circeo. Progetto “Parchi in qualità” ovvero “applicazione pilota del Sistema di Gestione Ambientale nelle aree naturali protette”. ENEA, pp 1–81Google Scholar
  5. Ansaloni L, Pellizzato M, Zunarelli-Vandini R (1986) Policheti di interessse economiconella laguna di Venezia. Nova Thalassia 8:641–642Google Scholar
  6. Arana IL, Diaz OD (2006) Polychaeta (Annelida) associated with Thalassia testudinum in the northeastern coastal waters of Venezuela. Rev Biol Trop Int J Trop Biol Conserv 54:971–978Google Scholar
  7. Baez D, Ardila NE (2003) Polychaetes (Annelida: Polychaeta) of the Colombian Caribbean. Biota Colomb 4:89–109Google Scholar
  8. Bayed A, Cherkaoui F, Glémarec M (2006) Population dynamics of Scolelepis squamata (Annelida: Polychaeta) from a Northwest African beach. Cah Biol Mar 47:143–155Google Scholar
  9. Beldi H, Gimbert F, Maas S, Scheiffer R, Soltani N (2006) Seasonal variations of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn in the edible mollusc Donax trunculus (Mollusca, Bivalvia) from the gulf of Annaba, Algeria. Afr J Agr Res 1:85–90Google Scholar
  10. Bouzeraa N, Abbes A, Soltani N (2004) Analyse des protéines chez trois espèces de bivalves vivant dans des milieux différents, la lagune El Mellah et le golfe d’Annaba. Bull INSTM 9:97–100Google Scholar
  11. Cazaux C (1965) Evolution de Perinereis cultrifera (Grube) au cours d’un cycle annuel à Arcachon. Soc Linn Bord 101:1–18Google Scholar
  12. Crisp D (1971) Energy flow measurements. In: Holme NA, Mc Intyre AD (eds) Methods for the study of marine benthos. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 197–279Google Scholar
  13. Day JH (1967) Polychaeta of Southern Africa. Part I. Errantia. British Museum (National History), LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Durchon M (1951) Les modalités de l’essaimage de Perinereis cultrifera Grube (Annélide Polychète) à Luc-sur-Mer (Calvados). Arch Zool Exp Gén 88:1–6Google Scholar
  15. Durchon M (1957) Problèmes posés par le comportement des néréidiens au moment de leur reproduction. Ann Biol 33:31–42Google Scholar
  16. Ertan Çinar M, Katağan T, Koçak F, Öztürk B, Ergen Z, Kocatas A, Önen M, Kirkim F, Bakir K, Kurt G, Dağli E, Açik S, Doğan A, Özcan T (2008) FaunaL assemblages of the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis in and around Alsancak Harbour (Izmir Bay, eastern Mediterranean) with special emphasis on alien species. J Mar Syst 71:1–17View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Fadlaoui S, Retière C (1995) Etude bionomique des communautés macrozoobenthiques des fonds subtidaux de la région de Sidi Boulbra (côte atlantique marocaine) et biogéographie des espèces. Bull Inst Sci Rabat 19:119–135Google Scholar
  18. Fage L, Legendre R (1927) Pêches planctoniques à la lumière effectuées à Banyuls-sur-Mer et à Concarneau. Arch Zool Exp Gén 67:23–222Google Scholar
  19. Fauvel P (1916) Annélides polychètes pélagiques provenant des yatchs « Hirondelle » et « Princesse alice » . Résultats scientifiques des campagnes du Prince Albert 1er de Monaco 48:1–152Google Scholar
  20. Fauvel P (1923) Polychètes errantes. Faune de France. Lechevaliers, ParisGoogle Scholar
  21. Fischer A, Dorresteijn A (2004) The polychaete Platynereis dumerilii (Annelida): a laboratory animal with spiralian cleavage, lifelong segment proliferation and a mixed benthic/pelagic life cycle. BioEssays 26:314–325PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Pfaller JB, Bjorndal KA, Reich KJ, Williams KL, Frick, MG (2006) Distribution patterns of epibionts on the carapace of loggerhead turtles, Caretta caretta. J Mar Biol Ass UK 2: 1–4. Biodiversity records, published on-line, http://www.mba.ac.uk/jmba/pdf/5381.pdf
  23. Gayanilo FC, Pauly D (1989) Announcing the release of version 1.1 of the Compleat ELEFAN Software Package. Fishbyte 7.2:20–31Google Scholar
  24. Gayanilo FC, Soriano M, Pauly D (1988) A draft guide to the ELEFAN ICLARM Software Project 2, pp 1–70Google Scholar
  25. Gayanilo FC, Sparre P, Pauly D (2005) FISAT II FAO ICLARM. Outils d’évaluation des stocks, pp 1–198Google Scholar
  26. Giangrande A (1997) Polychaete reproductive patterns, life cycles and life histories: an overview. Ocean Mar Biol Ann Rev 35:323–386Google Scholar
  27. Gillet P (1993) Impact de l’implantation d’un barrage sur la dynamique des populations de Nereis diversicolor (annélide polychète) de l’estuaire du Bou Regreg Maroc. J Rec Ocean 18:15–18Google Scholar
  28. Glassom D, Branch GM (1997) Impact of predation by greater flamingos Phoenicopterus ruber on the macrofauna of two southern African lagoons. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 149:1–12View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Guerra-Garcia JM, Garcia-Gomez JC (2004) Polychaete assemblages and sediment pollution in a harbour with two opposing entrances. Helgol Mar Res 58:183–191View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Guerra-Garcia JM, Gonzales-Villa FJ, Garcia-Gomez JC (2003) Aliphatic hydrocarbon pollution and macrobenthic assemblages in Ceuta harbour: a multivariate approach. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 263:127–138View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Herpin R (1925) Recherches biologiques sur la reproduction et le développement de quelques annelides polychètes. Bull Soc Sci Nat Ouest Fr 4:1–250Google Scholar
  32. Marcel R (1962) Cycle annuel de Perinereis cultrifera Grube (Annélide Polychète) à Alger. Mém Soc Sci Nat Cherbourg 19:39–54Google Scholar
  33. Ménard F, Gentil F, Dauvin JC (1989) Population dynamics and secondary production of Owenia fusioformis Delle Chiaje (Polychaeta) from the Bay of Seine (eastern English Channel). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 133:151–167View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Peres JM, Rancurel P (1948) Observations sur la ponte de Perinereis cultrifera Grube dans le golfe de Marseille. Bull Soc Zool Fr 73:97–100Google Scholar
  35. Posey MH, Alphin TD, Cahoon LB, Lindquist DG, Mallin MA, Nevers MB (2002) Top-down versus bottom-up limitation in benthic infaunal communities: direct and indirect effects. Estuaries 25:999–1014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Posey MH, Alphin TD, Cahoon LB (2006) Benthic community responses to nutrient enrichment and predator exclusion: influence of background nutrient concentrations and interactive effects. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 330:105–118View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Rouabah A, Scaps P (2003a) Life cycle and population dynamics of the Polychaete Perinereis cultrifera from the Algerian Mediterranean coast. Mar Ecol PSZN 24:85–99View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Rouabah A, Scaps P (2003b) Two-dimensional electrophoresis analysis of proteins from epitokous forms of the polychaete Perinereis cultrifera from the English Channel and the Mediterranean Sea. Cah Biol Mar 44:227–236Google Scholar
  39. Rouabah L, Rouabah A, Ferroudj S, Scaps P (2008) Comparison of the life cycles of two populations of the polychaete Perinereis cf. cultrifera from the Bay of Algiers (Mediterranean Sea). Sci Mar 72:769–778View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Roubah A, Rouabah L, Tahar A, Scaps P (2009) Variations in paragnath number of the different morphs of the polychaete Perinereis cf. cultrifera in relation to geographical location and type of reproduction. Am J Sci Res 1:12–22Google Scholar
  41. Rouhi A, Gillet P, Deutsch B (2008) Reproduction and population dynamics of Perinereis cultrifera (Polychaeta: Nereididae) of the Atlantic coast, El Jadida, Morocco. Cah Biol Mar 49:151–160Google Scholar
  42. Sanchez-Moyano JE, Garcia-Adiego EM, Estacio FJ, Garcia-Gomez JC (2001) Influence of the density of Caulerpa prolifera (Chlorophyta) on the composition of the macrofauna in a meadow in Algeciras Bay (Southern Spain). Cienc Mar 27:47–71Google Scholar
  43. Scaps P, Retière C, Desrosiers G, Miron G (1992) Dynamique d’une population de Perinereis cultrifera (Grube) de la côte nord de Bretagne. Cah Biol Mar 33:477–494Google Scholar
  44. Scaps P, Roubah A, Leprêtre A (2000) Morphological and biochemical evidence that Perinereis cultrifera (Polychaeta: Annelida) is a complex of species. J Mar Biol Ass UK 80:735–736View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Sifi K, Chouahda S, Soltani N (2007) Biosurveillance de l’environnement par la mesure de biomarqueurs chez Donax trunculus (L., 1758) dans le golfe d’Annaba, (Algérie). Mésogée 63:11–18Google Scholar
  46. Thiel M, Gutow L (2005) The ecology of rafting in the marine environment. II. The rafting organisms and community. Ocean Mar Biol Ann Rev 43:279–418View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Vittor BA (1984) Taxonomic field guide to the polychaetes of the northern gulf of Mexico. Minerals Management Service,Gulf of Mexico Regional Office, pp 1–154Google Scholar
  48. Vittor BA (1997a) Florida Bay and Adjacent Waters Benthic Community assessment. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service, Office of Ocean Resources Conservation and Assessment, pp 1–52Google Scholar
  49. Vittor BA (1997b) Galveston Bay, Texas Benthic Community assessment. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service, Office of Ocean Resources Conservation and Assessment, pp 1–33Google Scholar
  50. Vittor BA (1998) Florida Bay, Florida Benthic Community assessment. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service, Office of Ocean Resources Conservation and Assessment, pp 1–56Google Scholar
  51. Warwick RM, Price R (1975) Macrofauna production in an estuarine mud flat. J Mar Biol Ass UK 55:1–18View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Wolf WJ, Wolff L (1977) Biomass and production of zoobenthos in the Grevelingen estuary, the Netherlands. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 5:1–24Google Scholar
  53. Zghal F, Ben Amor Z (1989) Sur la présence en Méditerranée de la race épitoque de Perinereis cultrifera (Polychète). Arch Inst Pasteur Tunis 66:293–301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Zribi S, Zghal F, Tekaya S (2007) Ovogenèse de Perinereis macropus Claparède 1870 (Annélide Polychète) dans le golfe de Gabès (Tunisie). C R Biol 330:199–204PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Springer-Verlag and AWI 2010